Laurence Kalkstein, a professor in the Department of Public Health Sciences at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine who was not involved in the study, observed that there are other variables that influence how much a city can benefit
from warming mitigation.
Not exact matches
«These results show that the
warming signal
from strategies that focus only on outdoor water - use reductions can meaningfully offset the cooling effects of a major heat
mitigation strategy, such as citywide cool roof deployment,» they write.
It is, in passages, a downright gloomy case, and several authors on Tuesday said the next report in 10 years hence will likely see a shift in emphasis
from mitigation - or avoiding the problem - to adaptation, or learning to live with
warming.
Beyond preparing for the inevitable, the report also calls for climate
mitigation, including implementing the 2015 Paris Agreement in order to have «any hope of avoiding catastrophic effects
from sea - level rise and other outcomes of global
warming.»
A large ensemble of Earth system model simulations, constrained by geological and historical observations of past climate change, demonstrates our self ‐ adjusting
mitigation approach for a range of climate stabilization targets ranging
from 1.5 to 4.5 °C, and generates AMP scenarios up to year 2300 for surface
warming, carbon emissions, atmospheric CO2, global mean sea level, and surface ocean acidification.
The influencing of policy in re global
warming faces a huge amount of inertia, but principles of risk
mitigation tell us that we should be aggressive about shifting policy to avert possible threats, the opposite of what results
from that inertia.
The findings came
from the Climate Accountability Institute, an entity led by Richard Heede, whose company, Climate
Mitigation Services, advises companies, municipalities and others on how to cut greenhouse gases, and Naomi Oreskes, the Harvard historian and co-author of «Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues
from Tobacco Smoke to Global
Warming.»
Trees help fight global
warming by absorbing C02
from our atmosphere, making them a vital component of climate change
mitigation strategies.
China's role as a promoter of renewable energy development in Africa can offer it valuable recognition as a contributor to global efforts towards the
mitigation of climate change and can serve to reaffirm its position as a lead nation among developing countries, protecting vulnerable countries
from the impacts of global
warming and fostering their economic growth and development in the process.12
Articles about methods, paleoclimatology,
mitigation, adaptation, and effects at least implicitly accept human - caused global
warming and were usually obvious
from the title alone.
An open access special issue of the International Journal of Global
Warming brings together, for the first time, empirical evidence of loss and damage
from the perspective of affected people in nine vulnerable countries...... «Loss and damage» refers to adverse effects of climate variability and climate change that occur despite
mitigation and adaptation efforts.
One thing that stopped me in my tracks was an image - the photo of smog in China - and I invite you to visit www.thegreatwarming.com to see what we've been able to accomplish by combining solid science
from IPCC, NOAA, NCAR, ICC and more with visually arresting global stories about
warming and
mitigation efforts.
Lawson has made it perfectly clear that his doubts about the economics of global
warming mitigation date
from his work on a House of Lords Working Group — nothing to do with Climategate.
The situation is indeed clear; we can logically conclude
from geology, physics, climate science, ecology, and economics that a few hundred more ppm of CO2 would most likely be net beneficial globally and even for those areas or circumstances in which global
warming would not be beneficial it would be considerably more feasible and cost effective to implement local adaptations than attempt global
mitigation which comes with no money - back guarantees should the entire (100 %) world not play ball.
Posted in Advocacy, Biodiversity, Climatic Changes in Himalayas, Development and Climate Change, Disasters and Climate Change, Ecosystem Functions, Energy, Environment, Flood, Forest, Global
Warming, Governance, Information and Communication, International Agencies, Land, Lessons, Livelihood, Migration,
Mitigation, News, Population, Tourism, Vulnerability, Water, Weather Comments Off on Watching Global
Warming From The Roof Of The World
The instabilities in the climate system and the movement
from global
warming to global heating kicks in above 350 ppm, so that as the ppm increase,
mitigation opportunities are lost and catastrophic harms on an even grander grand scale (as noted by Mike) will continue to occur to human and other life forms.
In its latest assessment of the progress of climate change, the body said: «If
warming is not kept below two degrees centigrade, which will require the strongest
mitigation efforts, and currently looks very unlikely to be achieved, the substantial global impacts will occur, such as species extinctions, and millions of people at risk
from drought, hunger, flooding.»
For the past year, through a grant
from the Fund for Investigative Journalism, journalist Wendy Williams has been investigating global
warming mitigation stories.
No policy to abate global
warming by controlling CO2 emissions would prove cost - effective solely on grounds of the welfare benefit
from climate
mitigation.
-LSB-...] you can accept all the basic tenets of greenhouse physics and still conclude that the threat of a dangerously large
warming is so improbable as to be negligible, while the threat of real harm
from climate -
mitigation policies is already so high as to be worrying, that the cure is proving far worse than the disease is ever likely to be,» Ridley said in the 2011 Angus Millar speech on «Scientific Heresy,» reposted in its entirety at the skeptical blog Watts Up With That.
Mitigation and adaptation are essential to addressing climate change over the long term, but over the short to medium term they will almost certainly be insufficient to protect the world's poorest
from the worst effects of global
warming.
From our simulations, we conclude that
warming by the middle of the twenty - first century that is stronger than earlier estimates is consistent with recent observed temperature changes and a mid-range «no
mitigation» scenario for greenhouse - gas emissions.»
Both the probability of damage
from CO2 induced global
warming (the range of projected temps) and the cost of damage and / or
mitigation (technology marches on and gets cheaper) decades in the future are unknown.
But they differ
from mainstream views because they're not convinced there's a substantial risk that future
warming could be large or its impacts severe, or that strong
mitigation policies are desirable.
This, coming
from a historian who apparently needs some kind of time travel ability in order for her tale to be plausible regarding her discovery of who her «tobacco - associated critics» were, and this overall concern coming
from a side of the issue which doesn't merely believe global
warming mitigation efforts are just a sensible thing to do, there's a moral imperative to stop those who are committing crimes against humanity.
China would benefit
from early
mitigation, but immediate action is critical for the world to have a reasonable chance of keeping
warming below the 2ºC target.»
Mitigation plans proposed by governments would slow down the rate of carbon emissions but continuing emissions as well as feedbacks
from ice melt,
warming oceans, methane release and fires would continue to push temperatures upwards.
In fact, the Yohe paper that Romm cites suggests that additional
warming of up to 2 °C, may be on the whole a net benefit to humanity, even though, like others, it seems that study doesn't fully consider the increases in adaptive capacity and secular technological change, consideration of which would reduce future damages
from climate change, effectively increasing the temperature beyond which climate change would result in net losses globally, and reduce the benefit - cost ratio for
mitigation.
Summary of how they got to this finding: They use CMIP models which, if not outright flawed, have not proved their validity in estimated temperature levels in the 2030 to 2070 timeframe, are used as the basis for extrapolations that assert the creation of more and more 3 - sigma «extreme events» of hot weather; this is despite the statistical contradiction and weak support for predicting significant increases in outlier events based on mean increases; then, based on statistical correlations between mortality and extreme heat events (ie heat waves), temperature
warming trends are conjured into an enlargement of the risks
from heat events; risks increase significantly only by ignoring obvious adjustments and
mitigations any reasonable community or person would make to adapt to
warmer weather.
Turn Down the Heat: Climate Extremes, Regional Impacts, and the Case for Resilience (Read it in Issuu, Scribd, Open Knowledge Repository) takes the climate discussion to the next level, building on a 2012 World Bank report that concluded
from a global perspective that without a clear
mitigation strategy and effort, the world is headed for average temperatures 4 degrees Celsius
warmer than pre-industrial times by the end of this century.
If you expect strong
mitigation that holds down
warming, then you try to preserve today's forests and nurse them through, protecting them
from fire and other threats.
Because of the long atmospheric lifetime of some of the main greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, there is a mismatch between the payoff
from climate change
mitigation, which involves reducing emissions of planet
warming greenhouse gases to lessen to severity of climate change, and climate change adaptation, which refers to measures to better withstand the impacts of climate change.
The exact
warming resulting
from this delay depends on the trajectory of future CO2 emissions but using one business - as usual - projection we estimate an increase of 3/4 °C for every 15 - year delay in CO2
mitigation.
* According to the Berkeley group, the Earth's surface temperature will have risen (on average) slightly less than what indicated by NASA, NOAA and the Met Office * Differences will be on the edge of statistical significance, leaving a lot open to subjective interpretation * Several attempts will be made by climate change conformists and True Believers to smear the work of BEST, and to prevent them
from publishing their data * After publication, organised groups of people will try to cloud the issue to the point of leaving the public unsure about what exactly was found by BEST * New questions will be raised regarding UHI, however the next IPCC assessment's first draft will be singularly forgetful of any peer - reviewed paper on the topic * We will all be left with a slightly -
warming world, the only other certitude being that all
mitigation efforts will be among the stupidest ideas that ever sprung to human mind.