There is no evidence that health or health - related effects
from wind turbine noise would be any different to those from other noise sources at similar levels.
Annoyance
from wind turbine noise has previously been evaluated, primarily in cross-sectional studies.
It is also clear that the original widely publicised complaint to the NHMRC and AHPRA alleging professional and research misconduct, was done for precisely the same reasons by those within public health and wind industry circles in Australia who were unhappy with the attention the issue of health damage
from wind turbine noise was attracting.
Not exact matches
«The
noise from wind turbines is not very loud,» says Virginia Tech's Richardo Burdisso, a professor of mechanical engineering and Arenas» colleague in Blacksburg.
Hi Andrew, Thought you could update list with this paper on Effects of industrial
wind turbine noise on sleep and health The study proves
noise emissions
from IWTs disturb sleep & impair mental health: http://www.noiseandhealth.org/article.asp?issn=1463-1741;year=2012;volume=14;issue=60;spage=237;epage=243;aulast=Nissenbaum Cheers Jamie
That didn't happen here, although one proposed farm was abandoned because the vibration
from the
wind turbines would have increased the «seismic
noise» at the Laser Interferometry Gravitational Observatory», half of which is located on the Hanford Site, looking for gravitational waves.
The
noise from wind turbines doesn't disrupt the integrity of the biosphere.
Lyme, N.Y.,
Wind Energy Conversion Systems Law [7.5 - MB PDF]-- 1 / 2 - mile setback
from property lines, 1 - mile setback
from schools, churches, public gathering places; 30 / 35 - dBA +18 - dBC
noise limit at property line Union, Wisc., Large
Wind Turbine Citizens Committee Setback Recommendations Report [24 - MB PDF]
This industry has been well aware of the problems directly caused by
wind turbine noise since 1987, when Dr Neil Kelley's research [12] establishing direct causation of annoyance symptoms from infrasound and low frequency noise was presented at the American Wind Energy Association confere
wind turbine noise since 1987, when Dr Neil Kelley's research [12] establishing direct causation of annoyance symptoms
from infrasound and low frequency
noise was presented at the American
Wind Energy Association confere
Wind Energy Association conference.
Mr Barnard also fails to mention the opinions of rural family physicians such as Dr Sandy Reider,
from Vermont, who is at the front line of clinical care for those affected by
wind turbine noise, that «
wind turbine syndrome» is a euphemistic description which does not sufficiently depict the clinical severity of the clinical cases he is seeing [10].
Professor Hansen's team's research findings have now supported Dr Laurie's statement in 2011 about the distance of impact and are consistent with the residents» consistent reports for nearly four years of a low frequency
noise problem
from the
wind turbines at Waterloo, which severely disrupts their sleep.
Stephana had lived for years among the
wind turbines in the Cultus - Clear Creek - Frogmore
wind power project, developed by AIM PowerGen, and was one of the forst people in Ontario to experience symptoms
from exposure to the vibration and
noise emissions.
«Picton, Ontario, November 16, 2010 — High levels of low frequency
noise (LFN) are produced and can be measured at
wind turbine developments according to Richard James INCE, acoustics specialist
from Michigan.
On October 14, 2014, after more than four years of hearing testimony
from residents, visiting the
wind project, studying the science on wind turbine noise, speaking to researchers, and reviewing noise testing results, the Brown County Board of Health correctly and courageously declared Duke Energy's Shirley Wind turbines a «Human Health Hazard» in accordance with Brown County and Wisconsin state statu
wind project, studying the science on
wind turbine noise, speaking to researchers, and reviewing noise testing results, the Brown County Board of Health correctly and courageously declared Duke Energy's Shirley Wind turbines a «Human Health Hazard» in accordance with Brown County and Wisconsin state statu
wind turbine noise, speaking to researchers, and reviewing
noise testing results, the Brown County Board of Health correctly and courageously declared Duke Energy's Shirley
Wind turbines a «Human Health Hazard» in accordance with Brown County and Wisconsin state statu
Wind turbines a «Human Health Hazard» in accordance with Brown County and Wisconsin state statutes.
Wind turbine noise is a reported cause of these effects; however, some commentators suggest sound from wind turbines does not pose a risk of any adverse health effect in hum
Wind turbine noise is a reported cause of these effects; however, some commentators suggest sound
from wind turbines does not pose a risk of any adverse health effect in hum
wind turbines does not pose a risk of any adverse health effect in humans.
Researchers are working on high - frequency
noise generators that would be audible to bats and drive them away
from wind turbines, ultraviolet lights to illuminate towers and repel bats, and behavioral studies that would help the industry fine - tune when it should feather
turbines.
We are dismayed to see people being forced
from their homes due to incessant,
wind turbine generated low - frequency
noise and infrasound; and horrified as we witnessed those in positions of power not only fail to help those people, but turn on these victims of a government - sanctioned, subsidy - soaked industry.
What is worse though, for someone who parades his «health» credentials while behaving like a dilettante on actual
noise issues, Chapman and other «health professionals» display an amazing lack of compassion in their dismissive attitude to people who claim to be suffering debilitating effects
from pervasive
wind turbine noise.
I believe he visited one or more of the houses that the
wind farm opponents claim have been abandoned due to
noise from the
turbines.
She said in her speech: «I can honestly say that I have hardly heard a
noise coming
from the
wind turbines.»
«We don't take this step lightly,» says Jane Wilson, WCO President and a Registered Nurse, «but with the MOECC not responding to thousands of reports of excessive
noise from wind turbines, which is affecting sleep and health for Ontario families, we had no choice.
In 2011, the Michigan
Wind Working Group Technical and Health Committee recommended lowering the state's old
turbine noise limits
from 55dBa to 40dBa.
The level of background
noise at distances of a kilometre or more
from wind turbines makes measuring the effect of sound
from wind turbines on people at such distances complicated.
Scott Stafford — Berkshire Eagle — August 10, 2014 CLARKSBURG — News that
noise coming
from the
wind turbines in the Hoosac Wind project exceeded state standards has some of the project's neighbors calling for action, and others shrugging their should
wind turbines in the Hoosac
Wind project exceeded state standards has some of the project's neighbors calling for action, and others shrugging their should
Wind project exceeded state standards has some of the project's neighbors calling for action, and others shrugging their shoulders.
I find it interesting that while there have been many complaints
from wind power opponents about how much
noise wind turbines make, this is the only recording that I have come across of a sound that could be truly annoying.
While the results for people set upon by subsidy - soaked
wind power outfits are a tragedy, the real tragedy is that those who are paid handsomely to protect them, not only ignore their plight, but side with the
wind industry, protecting it
from any attempt by their victims to regulate or control
noise emissions
from wind turbines.
• artificial reef effects • continual operational
noise and vibrations emanating
from the
wind turbines; • electromagnetic impacts due to cabling that may impact navigation
Whilst it is not yet clear that these parameters would adequately protect the health of vulnerable members of the community
from the effects of chronic cumulative exposure, why are these limits for infrasound and low frequency
noise exposure universally ignored by those members of the acoustics profession who have written the
wind turbine noise pollution regulations for governments?
The new science on
wind turbine noise, confirms that the setback of 550 metres is not sufficient to protect health and that the 40 dBA standard used by Ontario to assess
noise emissions
from wind turbines is not adequate.
[8] In other words, direct causation of the reported «annoyance» effects
from the impulsive reproduced sound energy identical to «
wind turbine noise» was clearly established.
Wind turbine noise was described as comparable to rustling leaves, flowing streams, air - conditioned offices or refrigerators heard
from the next room.
However, as the
wind speed increases,
noise from wind passing through vegetation also increases which can mask the
noise from wind turbines.
To reflect the ministry's conservative approach to dealing with
noise emissions
from wind turbines and to support the adoption of the 2013 CSA standard, three amendments are being proposed to the definition of «sound power level» in the REA Regulation to provide clarity:
Having already been whacked with costly lawsuits
from wind farm neighbours — in one case a court awarding Dkr 500,000 (A$ 93,439) in compensation for the substantial reduction in the value of the plaintiffs» home, caused by incessant
turbine noise (see our post here)-- the Danish
wind industry has resorted to the wholesale destruction of homes in order to carpet the country in even more of the things.
The incessant
turbine generated low - frequency
noise and infrasound
from AGL's Macarthur
wind farm in western Victoria has been driving neighbours nuts or out of their homes since December 2012.
Regulations for
wind turbine noise presently in force are inadequate to protect rural residents
from annoyance and, in many cases, health problems resulting
from operating
wind turbines.
This is the same government, indeed the same ministry, that promised to deal with reports of
noise and other effects
from industrial - scale
wind turbines.
Turbine noise is an ongoing concern:
Wind Concerns received MOECC documents earlier this year showing that the ministry has had thousands of complaints about excessive noise and vibration from operating wind turbines, but has not resolved any of the probl
Wind Concerns received MOECC documents earlier this year showing that the ministry has had thousands of complaints about excessive
noise and vibration
from operating
wind turbines, but has not resolved any of the probl
wind turbines, but has not resolved any of the problems.
Certainly any sound
from the
wind farm would not be a problem, no - one would hear the
turbines because of the traffic
noise.
Support for the Danish and Swedish academic opposition to the new, lax legislation on
wind turbine noise being concocted in Copenhagen has been coming
from a number of
noise engineers, acousticians, doctors, psychologists and nurses in the UK, the US, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, etc. who have expressed in conferences and in the media their concern about the failure of governments to address properly the
wind farm health problem.
Health aspects associated with
wind turbine noise — results
from three field studies Pedersen, Eja
In several records, staff noted that
wind turbine noise exceeded regulations: ««Staff have attended at the complainants homes on multiple occasions...
noise measurements were obtained... subjective observations were made by Provincial Officers... the conclusion of the POs were that the
noise emissions
from the
wind turbines were causing an adverse effect contrary to S. 14 (1) of the EPA at the complainants locations...»
WCO says that projects not built yet should also be halted, such as the North Kent II, where water problems persist, and Amherst Island, to name two, where a tiny island community will be exposed to
noise emissions
from 26 50 - storey high
wind turbines and endangered wildlife will be affected.
STT loves Ralph Leutton's specious comparison between
noise from turbines and waves lapping on a moonlit beach — a line that comes straight
from the
wind industry play book.
Infrasound — Expand MOECC testing to include the full range of
noise emissions
from wind turbines as independent testing shows the presence of elevated levels of infrasound in homes where residents have had to leave to protect their health.
In Australia, where the controversy is reaching new heights, a
wind industry executive has been singling out Dr Sarah Laurie in a bid to make the public forget the many other health professionals who alert the public to the dangerous effects of
wind turbines: «[T] he largest public relations issue for the industry at the moment is the theory of an ex-doctor that infrasound or low frequency
noise from wind turbines is likely to make anyone within 10 km of a
wind turbine sick» (2).
The review includes an up to date review of measurement techniques for assessing
noise from wind turbines in accordance with international standards.
Noise from turbines plays a minor role in comparison with other factors in leading people to report annoyance in the context of
wind turbines.
Post-operation, the numbers of bat deaths and bird kills far exceed what was expected
from the
wind turbines,
noise complaints are being made more frequently as a result of more powerful
turbines, and
wind power companies have abused their approvals by removing trees
from protected woodlands, for example, or placing
turbines on sites not consistent with the approvals.
... According to a review by Lovich and Ennen (2013), the construction and operation of
wind farms have both potential and known impacts on terrestrial vertebrates, such as: (i) increase in direct mortality due to traffic collisions; (ii) destruction and modification of the habitat, including road development, habitat fragmentation and barriers to gene flow; (iii)
noise effects, visual impacts, vibration and shadow flicker effects
from turbines; (iv) electromagnetic field generation; (v) macro and microclimate change; (vi) predator attraction; and (vii) increase in fire risks.