Sentences with phrase «front crash rating»
The Nissan scored only four stars in the overall safety crash ratings and the front crash rating.
https://www.allenmellododgenashua.com/
5 star driver front crash rating.
Active safety wasn't on the 2016 Forte sedan's menu, and its Insurance Institute for Highway Safety small overlap front crash rating of Marginal pegged it as an als0 - ran to the Honda Civic, which is an IIHS Top Safety Pick Plus.
received updated larger front headrests to comply with new front crash rating standards.
For front crash ratings, the cars are slammed into a deforming offset barrier at 40 miles per hour.
Not exact matches
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety replicated small front - overlap crashes with seven small SUVs that received good ratings after the front driver's side corner of the vehicle hit a barrier at 40 mph.
In a statement to CNBC, a Tesla rep said: «Tesla's Model S received the highest rating in IIHS's crash testing in every category except for one, the small overlap front crash test, where it received the second highest rating available.
There in front of the station a car had crashed into a light post — and, to judge from the condition of the car's front end, had done so at a significant rate of speed.
«According to the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, approximately one in four of all motor vehicle crashes that involve children occur from the side, and these crashes result in a significantly higher injury rate than front or rear crashes.»
The requirements for front crash prevention systems also became tighter for 2016, as TSP + winners must earn either an «Advanced» or a «Superior» rating.
Of the 32 vehicles tested, 19 earned a Good or Acceptable rating for small front - overlap crashes.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety awarded the Focus a Top Safety Pick rating, as it scored good (out of a possible poor, marginal, acceptable and good) in all crash tests except the small overlap front test, in which it scored acceptable.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety also gave the Fusion its coveted «Top Safety Pick +» rating, following an «acceptable» rating in the small - overlap front crash test.
The Mustang and Challenger are available with basic - rated front crash prevention systems.
The Buick Envision received the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's Top Safety Pick Plus rating for earning the highest rating of good (out of a possible good, acceptable, fair and poor) in all crashworthiness tests and a score of advanced (out of a possible not available, basic, advanced and superior) in front crash prevention with optional equipment.
In order to earn a Top Safety Pick rating, a vehicle must earn a score of «Good» in five key tests and be available with a basic front crash prevention system.
Safety, Reliability & Mileage Acadias built after January 2011 are Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Top Safety Picks, meaning they scored the institute's highest rating «Good» in all four crash tests the institute performs: front, side, rollover and rear, and have standard electronic stability systems.
Front and rear crash tests of the sedan received top marks of Good, while side tests produced Marginal ratings, which are second worst.
To earn the rating, cars must receive top scores of Good in front, side and rear crashes, as well as pass roof - strength tests that measure rollover protection.
In order to qualify for the Top Safety Pick + award, a vehicle must have a Good score on all five crashworthiness tests and it must come with a front crash prevention system that earns an Advanced or Superior rating.
The Sorento only offers a front collision warning system, while the IIHS» new criteria requires either an «Advanced» or «Superior» rating from frontal crash prevention systems, meaning that the vehicle must have some active element such as collision mitigation braking.
Requirements for the Top Safety Pick + award include «Good» ratings in the IIHS» moderate overlap front, side, roof strength, and head restraint tests; either a «Good» or «Acceptable» rating in the difficult small overlap front crash test» and at least a «Basic» rating for front crash prevention technology.
During this stringent front - overlap test, the IIHS found that the 2016 Kia Sorento had minimal intrusion into the driver's space, and significantly improved control of the dummy's motion compared with the 2014 - 2015 Kia Sorento, which received «Poor» ratings for the small overlap front crash test.
These changes mean that only cars with a front crash prevention score of «Advanced» or «Superior» will be rated TSP +, although all crash test requirements will stay the same.
Safety The Q70 has a five - star overall crash - test rating from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and it earned top scores of good in moderate - overlap front, side, rear and roof - strength tests by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
Safety While the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has not tested the 2014 X5, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety gave the SUV its top rating of good in its first two tests and called its front - crash protection superior (additional crash tests hadn't been performed as of publication).
Structural reinforcements, primarily in the front end, are designed to ensure that the Civic achieves a «good» rating in the difficult new IIHS slight - offset barrier crash test.
SAFETY The 2013 BMW X5 received the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's highest rating of Good in front -, side - and rear - impact crash tests.
It also received a «Basic» rating in front crash prevention because it doesn't have automatic braking technology.
To earn a Top Safety Pick + designation, vehicles must score a good rating in the moderate overlap front, side, rollover, and rear crash tests, in addition to an acceptable or good rating in the newer, more challenging small overlap front test.
The 2011 (and 2010) Ford Taurus is designated a Top Safety Pick by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, meaning it scored the institute's highest rating (Good) in front, side and rear crash tests and a roof - strength test, and that it comes with a standard electronic stability system.
To receive the highest rating of TOP SAFETY PICK +, vehicles must meet the same standards as for the TOP SAFETY PICK, as well as earn an «advanced» or «superior» rating for front crash prevention.
To give you the perfect blend of adventure and safety, it passed its IIHS» front crash prevention and mitigation test in the results of which it reduced a 25 - mph impact by 5 mph and a 12 - mph impact by 1 mph, receiving an advanced rating.
It also must earn an advanced or superior rating for front crash prevention and a good headlight rating.
To qualify for 2017 TOP SAFETY PICK, a vehicle must earn good ratings in the driver - side small overlap front, moderate overlap front, side, roof strength and head restraint tests, as well as an advanced or superior rating for front crash prevention.
It also must earn an advanced or superior rating for front crash prevention and an acceptable or good headlight rating.
With this system in, previous models received the highest rating for front crash prevention.
Performance requirements: Participating manufacturers will ensure vehicles have both a forward collision warning system that meets a subset of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's current 5 - Star Safety Ratings program requirements on the timing of driver alerts and an automatic braking system that earns at least an advanced rating in the current Insurance Institute for Highway Safety front crash prevention track tests.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) gives the Q3 Good ratings in all crash tests, including the small front over lap.
The MKZ got the maximum «Good» rating for moderate overlap front impact, side crash, roof strength and head restraints & seats.
Side, roof strength, front crash prevention, headlights and LATCH ratings can be compared across vehicle categories.
The IIHS annually recognizes vehicles that do the best job of protecting people in front, side, rollover and rear crashes based on good rating in a series of tests conducted by the Institute.
The NHTSA also assessed the Lincoln MKZ and gave it an overall five - star rating, with five stars for front impact, and four stars each for side crash and rollover.
2 2017 Kia Forte built after March 2017 when equipped with optional front crash prevention and high intensity discharge (HID) headlights with Dynamic Bending Light; 2017 Optima built after March 2017 when equipped with optional front crash prevention and LED headlights with High Beam Assist, 2017 Cadenza when equipped with optional front crash prevention and specific headlights, and 2018 Sorento built after May 2017 when equipped with newly acceptable - rated headlights offered on the SX Limited and the SX with Advanced Technology package.
The 2018 Kia Sedona minivan qualifies for the Top Safety Pick award when equipped with optional front crash prevention and good - rated headlights.
Within those groups, vehicles are listed in order of their ratings (good, acceptable, marginal or poor in the Institute's crashworthiness evaluations and headlight evaluations and superior, advanced, basic or not available for front crash prevention).
The large luxury car qualifies for the 2018 Top Safety Pick + award, thanks to good crashworthiness ratings across the board; standard, superior - rated front crash prevention; and base headlights that earn a good rating.
To earn Top Safety Pick, vehicles must achieve good ratings in the driver - side small overlap front, moderate overlap front, side, roof strength and head restraint tests; earn an advanced or superior rating for front crash prevention; and also have at least acceptable - rated headlights.
In government crash tests the 2014 Audi A6 received a perfect five - star rating in overall, front crash, side crash and rollover tests.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) granted the 850 / S70 their highest rating of «good» for front crash protection.