And since the front bay is open (used for storage, like a trunk) it helps protect the occupants of a Model S involved in
a front impact crash, since the front can crumple and absorb the impact without damaging anything dangerous.
Rear Facing is proven to be the safest direction of travel in the event of
front impact crash.
Not exact matches
And when it came to the side
impact and
front moderate overlap
crash tests, all three models earned the top evaluation of «good.»
«Had the Model S
impacted the
front or rear of the trailer, even at high speed, its advanced
crash safety system would likely have prevented serious injury as it has in numerous other similar incidents,» Tesla said.
Except that in the event of a
crash, your baby's seat could absorb the
impact of the
front seat (and it's passenger if occupied) in addition to the other
impacts of the
crash.
SafeCell
Impact Absorbing Base compresses to absorb
crash energy and counteract forward movement keeping your child clear from the seat in
front of them.
According to Alcoa, automotive aluminum can maintain or even increase the size and strength of a vehicle's
front - and back - end crumple zones, which absorb energy upon
crash impact without increasing overall weight.
A growing number of cars include
crash - imminent braking systems, which rely on optics to detect potential
front - end
impacts and proactively apply brakes.
Failure of the side
impact air bags and seat belt pretensioners to deploy in a
crash increase the risk of injury to the driver and
front seat occupant.
Volvo has an answer for that: when the number of low - speed
crashes goes dramatically down, the remaining accidents are of greater severity; when you take many cheap rear - endings out of the equation, you're left paying for the rollovers,
front - end
impacts, and «t - bone»
crashes, which are both more dangerous and more expensive.
Safety, Features & Pricing In
crash tests by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the X5 scored the top mark, Good, in
front, side and rear
impacts.
In individual tests, it scored three stars in a
front crash test, five stars in a side -
impact crash test and four stars in a rollover - resistance test.
SAFETY The 2013 BMW X5 received the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's highest rating of Good in
front -, side - and rear -
impact crash tests.
Safety The Eos earned scores of good in the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's
front - and side -
impact crash tests; it was not tested in other areas.
«The high ride height of the trailer combined with its positioning across the road and the extremely rare circumstances of the
impact caused the Model S to pass under the trailer, with the bottom of the trailer
impacting the windshield of the Model S. Had the Model S
impacted the
front or rear of the trailer, even at high speed, its advanced
crash safety system would likely have prevented serious injury as it has in numerous other similar incidents.»
To give you the perfect blend of adventure and safety, it passed its IIHS»
front crash prevention and mitigation test in the results of which it reduced a 25 - mph
impact by 5 mph and a 12 - mph
impact by 1 mph, receiving an advanced rating.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration gave the Altima four stars for frontal
crash protection for
front passenger and driver, side rear passenger, and rollover protection, and three stars for side driver
impact protection.
Bucket - seat models include a
front center air bag that deploys from the inboard side of the driver's seat and inflates between driver and
front passenger for added protection in a side -
impact crash.
The MKZ got the maximum «Good» rating for moderate overlap
front impact, side
crash, roof strength and head restraints & seats.
Safety features include
front and side airbags for both driver and passenger, side curtain head
impact airbags, 3 - point safety belts for all seating positions, 4 - wheel anti-lock brakes, daytime LED running lights, electronic stability control, blind spot monitoring, rear traffic alert, park distance control and intelligent
crash response system with emergency braking.
The NHTSA also assessed the Lincoln MKZ and gave it an overall five - star rating, with five stars for
front impact, and four stars each for side
crash and rollover.
In both
front and side
impact crash testing, the 2002 Audi A4 received good safety scores across the board.
The
front crash avoidance assessment was not led because the Ram 1500 does not offer an
impact cautioning or crisis programmed stopping mechanism.
The window sticker notes the safety rating of the vehicle overall, in a
front -
impact crash for both driver and passenger, side
impact crash for both
front and rear seat occupants, and the vehicle's risk of rolling over.
In order to earn a 2016 Top Safety Pick award, a vehicle is required to earn no less than five good ratings in moderate overlap
front, small overlap
front, side
impact, roof strength, and head restraints, along with a basic rating for
front crash prevention.
In addition to the top rating for frontal protection, the 2008 Jeep Patriot equipped with available
front torso airbags also was rated «Good» for side
impact protection and «Acceptable» for rear
crash protection.
The Chrysler Pacifica received the U.S. government's highest
crash test rating of five stars for both
front - and side -
impact when equipped with optional side - curtain air bags.
The 2010 Chrysler Town & Country received the highest possible U.S. Government
crash test rating of Five Stars in both
front and side
impact tests.
The Challenger doesn't perform well in small overlap
crash testing, scoring «Marginal» results from the IIHS, but scored best results of Good for the moderate
front overlap and side
impact test.
The CR - V was rated «Good» - the highest score available from the IIHS - in side
impact testing, roof strength testing, and moderate overlap
front crash testing, making it a Top Safety Pick from the organization for the 2012 and 2013 model years.
Front crash prevention systems with autonomous braking that can stop drivers from rear - ending another vehicle or slow them down enough to lessen the
impact are making a measurable difference in insurance claims (see Status Report special issue:
crash avoidance, July 3, 2012).
The Edge got an «Acceptable» rating in the small overlap
front impact and a minimum «Basic» rating for
crash avoidance and mitigation.
There are also new standard safety features, including an industry - first
front - center airbag that deploys during a side -
impact crash to keep font seat occupants safe from one another during
impact.
While the 2017 model's
crash results haven't been released yet, the IIHS» evaluation of the 2016 model last year was 4 - out - of - 5 stars, based on «Good» scores in all categories except Small Overlap
Front («Poor») and Side
Impact («Acceptable»).
IIHS rates vehicles based on their performance in moderate overlap
front crash, small overlap frontal
crash, side
impact and rollover, plus evaluations of seat / head restraints.
IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in high - speed
front and side
crash tests, a roof strength test for rollover protection, plus evaluations of seats / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear
impacts.
Beginning with 2006 models manufactured after August 2005, changes were made to the
front seat - mounted torso airbags to ensure better abdomen coverage in side
impact crashes (note: information about when a specific vehicle was manufactured is on the certification label typically affixed to the car on or near the driver door).
Beginning with 2015 models, the seat - mounted side torso airbags and
front door trim were modified to improve occupant protection in side
impact crashes.
Front and side
crashes usually are more serious, but rear
impacts are more common and the neck injuries that result can be debilitating.
In government
crash testing, the Corolla earned a top overall rating of five stars, including five stars for
front impacts and five stars for side
impacts.
Analysts examined the point of
impact for S60s and XC60s with City Safety and for comparable vehicles without a low - speed
front crash prevention system repaired under PDL coverage.
It is engineered to provide additional restraint to drivers and
front passengers in far - side
impact crashes, where the affected occupant is on the opposite, non-struck side of the vehicle.
In
crash tests conducted by ANCAP in 1998 to EuroNCAP regulations RHD Lanos 3dr hatchback showed poor performance, scoring 0.31 out of 16 in offset
front crash test and 6.98 of 16 in side
impact test.
The IIHS
crash tested the Rio sedan and only gave it a «Marginal» rating for the small overlap
front impact and an «Acceptable» rating for the side
impact.
** PANORAMIC SUNROOF ** NAVIGATION ** 4WD ** 4 DOOR SUPERCREW ** 5.0 L V8 ** FX4 OFF - ROAD PACKAGE ** LARIAT SPORT APPEARANCE PACKAGE ** LUXURY PACKAGE ** TECHNOLOGY PACKAGE ** BACKUP CAMERA ** RECENTLY INSTALLED ALL NEW OPTIONAL OFF - ROAD WHEELS AND TIRES ** BLIND - SPOT ALERT ** PARKING SENSORS ** LEATHER ** HEATED / COOLED SEATS ** PREMIUM SOUND ** TOWING PACKAGE ** PREMIUM WHEELS ** CLEAN CARFAX ** ONE OWNER ** REMAINING FACTORY WARRANTY ** ASE CERTIFIED TOP TO BOTTOM SERVICE INSPECTION ** TRADES WELCOME ** FUNCTIONAL2 - SPEED AUTOMATIC 4WD 4 - WHEEL DISC BRAKES W / ABS 12V AUXILIARY POWER POINT AUTOLAMP - AUTO ON / OFF HDLMPCLASS IV TRAILER HITCH W / SMART TRLR TOW CONNECTORHILL START ASSISTWIPER ACTIVATED HEADLAMPSINTERIOR8.0 CTR STACK TOUCH SCRN 8.0 PRODUCTIVITY SCREEN 10 - WAY PWR DRV / PASS SEATS A / C W / DUAL CLIMATE CONTROL ADJUST PEDALS W / MEMORY AMBIENT LIGHTINGAUTO DIM REARVIEW MIRRORCOLOR COORDINATED CARPET AND FLOOR MATSHTD / COOLED DVR / PASS SEATS LEATHER TRIMMED SEATS LEATHER WRAPPED STR WHEEL MEMORY DRIVER SEATSIRIUS SAT SVC N / A AK&HI TILT / TELESCOPE STR COLUMNEXTERIORBOXLINKDOOR HANDLES - BODY COLOR EASY FUEL CAPLESS FILLER FOG LAMPSFULLY BOXED STEEL FRAME HALOGEN HEADLAMPSLED BOX LIGHTINGLOCKING REMOVABLE TAILGATEPICKUP BOX TIE DOWN HOOKSPOWER SLIDING REAR WINDOW W / DEFROST & PRIVACY TINTSPARE TIRE & WHEEL LOCK TOW HOOKSWHEEL LIP MOLDINGS - BODYCOLORSAFETY / SECURITYADVANCED SECURITY PACK ADVANCETRAC WITH RSC AIRBAGS -
FRONT SEATMOUNTED SIDE
IMPACT AIRBAGS - SAFETY CANOPY CTR HIGH MOUNT STOP LAMP INTELLIGENT ACCESS W / PUSH BUTTON STARTMYKEYSOS POST
CRASH ALERT SYS TIRE PRESSURE MONITOR SYSINCLUDED ON THIS VEHICLEEQUIPMENT GROUP 501ALARIAT SERIESBLIS (BLIND SPOT INFO SYSTEM) REMOTE STARTREVERSE SENSING SYSTEM LED SIDE - MIRROR SPOTLIGHTS 110V / 400W OUTLETOPTIONAL EQUIPMENTSELECTSHIFT TRANSMISSION 5.0 L V8 FFV ENGINE275 / 55R20 BSW ALL - TERRAIN 3.55 ELECTRONIC LOCK RR AXLE 7000 # GVWR PACKAGEFRONT LICENSE PLATE BRACKET CALIFORNIA EMISSIONS SYSTEM TWIN PANEL MOONROOF VOICE - ACTIVATED NAVIGATION TRAILER TOW PACKAGEFX4 OFF - ROAD PACKAGE SKID PLATESTAILGATE STEP20 SIX - SPOKE PAINTED ALUM WHL36GAL EXTENDED RANGE FUEL TANKINTEGRATED TRAILER BRAKE CONTLARIAT SPORT APPEARANCE PKG LEATHER BUCKET SEATS W / CONSOLEAdvertised prices are subject to tax, title, license, registration, dealer documentary fee, and finance charges.
The IIHS has designated the 2017 Toyota Camry as a Top Safety Pick due to its stellar performance in every
crash test available (including small and moderate
front overlap, side
impact, and roof strength).
In
crash tests conducted by the NHTSA, it receives four out of five stars for passenger and driver
impacts and four - star ratings for
front and rear side
impacts.
It fared excellent in insurance industry
crash tests and generally garnered outstanding scores on other safety performance checks in the
front, side, and rear
impact and rollover categories.
For restraint and cushioning in the event of a
crash, this midsize crossover SUV has a driver's knee airbag, dual
front impact airbags, dual
front seat - mounted side -
impact airbags, and dual roof - mounted side - curtain airbags that flank all three rows.
The Lincoln MKC is only rated for the moderate
front overlap and side
impact tests (both good); it, too, gets a basic rating for
crash prevention.