The Freestyle also earns the «best pick» designation for
frontal crash test performance.
The new Sedona's
frontal crash test performance is an improvement compared with the previous model, which the Institute rated acceptable.
Not exact matches
For eight years the Institute has been providing comparative rankings of passenger vehicles based on
performance in
frontal offset
crash tests at 40 mph.
«Inside IIHS:
Frontal offset testing» explains the differences between the Institute's two frontal crash tests and demonstrates how structural performance, dummy injury measures and restraint systems affect a vehicle's frontal
Frontal offset
testing» explains the differences between the Institute's two
frontal crash tests and demonstrates how structural performance, dummy injury measures and restraint systems affect a vehicle's frontal
frontal crash tests and demonstrates how structural
performance, dummy injury measures and restraint systems affect a vehicle's
frontal frontal rating.
Similarly, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) dropped its Top Safety Pick rating of the Prius c for 2015 due to its poor
performance in the tricky small overlap
frontal -
crash test.
But as for the Jetta, its German engineering delivered a 5 - Star Overall Safety Rating from NHTSA, based on a 5 - star
test result in the side -
crash evaluation and 4 - star
performances for both
frontal -
crash and rollover situations.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has rated the Toyota Prius v «poor» for its
performance in small overlap
frontal crash testing.
In government
crash testing, the 2016 Acadia received a top five - star rating for overall
performance, with five stars for total
frontal impact safety and five stars for total side impact safety.
In government
crash testing, the 2016 Sonata earned a perfect five - star overall rating, with five stars overall for its
performance in
frontal - and side - impact
crash tests.
Nearly every passenger vehicle now earns a good rating in the Institute's
frontal crash test, but
performance varies widely in side and rear
tests.
Advanced Safety
Performance Utilizing Honda's second - generation Advanced Compatibility Engineering ™ (ACE ™) body structure and «3 - bone» front floor construction, along with advanced supplemental restraint systems and available Honda Sensing ™ safety and driver - assistive technologies, the 2017 Ridgeline targets the highest available
crash safety ratings from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) including an a 5 - star Overall Vehicle Score in the NHTSA's New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) and a TOP SAFETY PICK + score from the IIHS, including a GOOD rating in the Institute's rigorous small overlap
frontal collision
test.
Vehicle ratings (see attachment) reflect
performance in 40 mph
frontal offset
crash tests into a deformable barrier.
One of three new small sport utility vehicle designs recently
tested earns a good overall rating based on
performance in a 40 mph
frontal offset
crash test.
For the second year in a row, Aviator's suite of safety features earned it a «Best Pick in its Class» rating from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, based on
performance in the 40 mph
frontal offset
crash test.
It also did not
test the Steed in a pole
crash test, noting that it «was not conducted due to its poor
performance in the
frontal offset
test.»
«We are concerned about the «marginal»
performance of the Challenger in the small overlap
frontal crash test,» Lund said.