Sentences with phrase «frontal crash test result»

Frontal crash test results can't be compared across weight classes.

Not exact matches

A new frontal oblique test to address a crash type that continues to result in deaths and serious injuries despite the use of seat belts, air bags, and the crashworthy structures of late - model vehicles;

The US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) crash test results in 2001 gave the IS 300 the maximum five stars in the Side Driver and Side Rear Passenger categories, and four stars in the Frontal Driver and Frontal Passenger categories.

Because consumers pay attention to the Institute's crash test results, automakers are expected to upgrade their vehicles» side impact protection, just as they've upgraded the protection their vehicles offer in frontal crashes.

[70] ANCAP crash test results rate the fourth generation VE lower in the offset frontal impact test than the third generation VY / VZ Commodore.

It's also earned the federal government's top five - star crash - test results for frontal and side impacts.

The Institute's frontal crashworthiness evaluation is based on results of a 40 mph frontal offset crash test.

Debuting at the 2016 Chicago Auto Show and rolling into Hyundai showrooms this month, the revamped 2017 Santa Fe family has, evidently, been modified to resolve the single most significant reason consumers had to skip this model in the past, and that is its «Marginal» test result in the tough small overlap frontal - impact crash test conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS).

As a convenience to new car shoppers, the Overall Vehicle Score represents the combined results of the overall ratings from the frontal crash tests, the side crash tests2 and the rollover - resistance3 into a single, summary score between one and five stars.

«These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the Institute's frontal crash test program in bringing about improvements in vehicle designs,» says Adrian Lund, the Institute's chief operating officer.

The Institute's crashworthiness evaluations are based primarily on results of the frontal offset crash test at 40 mph.

The Institute will release results for small SUVs in the new small overlap frontal crash test in the spring.

The frontal crashworthiness rating is based on results of a 40 mph frontal offset crash test.

But as for the Jetta, its German engineering delivered a 5 - Star Overall Safety Rating from NHTSA, based on a 5 - star test result in the side - crash evaluation and 4 - star performances for both frontal - crash and rollover situations.

Studies of frontal crashes have shown similar results: Drivers of vehicles with good ratings in the Institute's frontal offset crash test are much less likely to die in frontal crashes.

[46] The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) crash test results in 2007 rated the ES 350 the maximum five stars in the Frontal Driver, Frontal Passenger, and Side Driver categories, and four stars in the Side Rear Passenger and Rollover categories.

In a release issued yesterday the institute said results from 2009 testing showed that small overlap crashes accounted for nearly a quarter of the frontal crashes involving serious or fatal injury to front seat occupants in vehicles that otherwise had good rating for frontal crash protection.

About the only negative press we've seen on the car was marginal crash test results by the Insurance Institute of Highway Safety in its small overlap frontal crash testing.

[36] U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) crash test results in 2004 rated the RX 330 the maximum five stars in the Frontal Driver, Frontal Passenger, Side Driver, and Side Rear Passenger categories, and four of five stars in the Rollover category.

The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) crash test results has given the RX 350 the maximum five star rating in the Frontal Driver, Frontal Passenger, Side Driver, and Side Rear Passenger categories, and four of five stars in the Rollover category at a risk of 16.4 %.

IIHS testing reveals that in crashes of this type the impact occurs toward the car's outer edge; the vehicle has a tendency to rotate during the collision, resulting in the driver's head moving outboard, away from the frontal airbag.

The Institute's side impact test results are a relatively new addition to the frontal offset crash test ratings the Institute has been providing to consumers since 1995.

U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) crash test results in 2003 rated the ES 300 the maximum five stars in the Frontal Driver, Frontal Passenger, and Side Driver categories, and four stars in the Side Rear Passenger and Rollover categories.

Crash test results combine scores from frontal, side - impact and rollover crash tests.

Frontal crashworthiness evaluations are based on results of frontal offset crash tests at Frontal crashworthiness evaluations are based on results of frontal offset crash tests at frontal offset crash tests at 40 mph.

The 2012 Toyota Prius c scored a highest grade (Good) on Frontal offset test results, Side impact test results, Roof strength test results and Rear crash protection / head restraint ratings.

On the safety front, the 2014 Honda Odyssey has received structural upgrades to help improve crash test results — specifically in the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's new small - overlap frontal crash test.

The Euro NCAP crash test result for Hyundai Kona states that the passenger compartment of the Kona remained stable in the frontal offset test.

Euro NCAP results revealed that the i30's cabin aced the frontal offset deformable barrier and side impact crash tests, but the hatchback also scored high in the safety assist and pedestrian protection departments.

The researchers compared injury data reported from real crashes with results of both the Institute's frontal offset crash tests and the federal government's full - front tests.

When the government had its crash tests, it was given outstanding results for both driver and passenger protection both in frontal and side crash tests.

The Institute's crashworthiness evaluations are based on results of frontal offset crash tests at 40 mph.

The Institute's frontal crashworthiness evaluations are based on results of 40 mph frontal offset crash tests.

The Institute's frontal crashworthiness evaluations are based on results of frontal offset crash tests at 40 mph.

The Overall Vehicle Score combines the results of a frontal crash test, side crash tests and rollover resistance tests and compares those results to the average risk of injury and potential for vehicle rollover of other vehicles to give vehicles an indexed single score that consumers can use for comparison when vehicle shopping.

As well as «excessive footwell deformation» occurring in frontal offset crash testing, which can results in lower leg injuries, ANCAP noted that elements of the dashboard were «a potential injury source for both the driver and passenger».