Sentences with phrase «fuel claim figure»
On the XE mid-size sedan, those figures translate to a swift 0 - 100 km / h time of 5.7 seconds and a respectable fuel claim figure of 6.7 L / 100 km combined.
https://www.motoring.com.au/ Not exact matches
During this time, TMG's Joel Mandel claimed Depp made more than $ 650 million, an enormous figure that Depp used to fuel a lavish lifestyle, including 14 residences, more than 200 artworks and a 156 - foot yacht.
They took particular issue with one excerpt in the book claiming the buses were «reported to be falling short in their fuel consumption and emission figures, in some cases worryingly.»
Bloom claims its boxes can halve a building's carbon footprint, a figure backed up by many familiar with such fuel cells.
The anonymous source claims that «While 1,000 bhp is possible, fuel consumption, emissions and engine tolerances will see a more realistic figure of 800bhp targeted.»
MPG and running costs > Audi claims a combined fuel economy figure of 40.4 mpg and 162g / km of CO2 for the S - tronic.
When WLTP becomes the new norm, claimed fuel economy figures for all cars will drop, and CO2 emissions will rise.
It's claimed to reach 62mph in 5.1 sec and run on to 155mph, but as yet Audi hasn't confirmed fuel economy or CO2 figures for the model.
Fiat claims a combined fuel consumption figure of 74.3 mpg and CO2 of 90g / km for the 84bhp TwinAir, while the more powerful two - pot manages 67.3 mpg.
Sure enough, Chrysler claims the Two - Mode system improves city fuel economy by 40 per cent, while the trucks» combined city / highway figures jump by 25 per cent.
It can't match the PHEV on paper, but its claimed fuel consumption of 53.3 mpg is pretty good for an SUV this size, although its 139g / km CO2 emissions figure still means a relatively pricey 29 % Benefit - in - Kind (BiK) rating for company - car drivers.
This Macan S Diesel has a claimed fuel economy figure of 19 kmpl in the UK cycle which is impressive.
Previously claiming a fuel consumption figure of 5.9 litres / 100 km, the 318i is now good for 5.1 litres / 100 km.
Being a relatively lightweight car with pretty efficient engines should make the MX - 5 cheap to run; during our real - world fuel economy test, the range - topping 2.0 - litre unit returned an incredible 47.9 mpg (up 7mpg on Mazda's official claimed figure).
The 237bhp diesel, badged 25d, brings a disappointingly large drop in claimed fuel economy figures, only managing 53.3 mpg combined as a rear - wheel drive car and emitting 129g / km.
Honda claims fuel efficiency figures of 19.5 km / l, 19 km / l, 27.8 km / l and 23.8 km / l for the petrol manual, petrol automatic, diesel manual and diesel automatic trims respectively.
While most car firms make great claims of improved efficiency with their new models, Jag has added a dollop more power — to hell with the CO2 and fuel economy figures.
The fuel - economy claims also match that outlandishness, and it's well worth sniggering at the 3.0 L / 100 km NEDC figure rather than planning your fuel stops around it.
Fuel economy is good, but nowhere near the claimed 69 mpg combined figure.
[18] Perodua claims ECE fuel consumption figures of 21.7 km / l for the manual variant and 21.0 km / l with the automatic, while the auto - only Advance variant is capable of 22.0 km / l, courtesy of the new Eco Idle stop - start system and regenerative braking.
Suzuki claims that the Vitara S - Turbo should achieve a fuel economy figure of 6.2 L / 100 km and our real - life figure was refreshingly close to that at 6.9 L with a mixture of urban and freeway driving.
[18] Perodua claims ECE fuel consumption figures of 22.8 km / l for the manual variant and 21.3 km / l with the automatic, both exhibiting a 1.2 km / l improvement over the old 1KR - DE.
The most economical non-electrified Countryman is, unsurprisingly, the Cooper D. Its claimed fuel economy figure of 65.7 mpg is very good; especially given the slower Audi Q2 1.6 TDI only manages 64.2 mpg.
The company claims an ADR Combined fuel economy figure of 6.5 L / 100 km on the rolling road.
It delivers a claimed combined fuel economy figure of 43.5 mpg with a CO2 output of 171g / km but will still propel the newly lightened Discovery to 60mph from rest in a brisk 8.0 sec.
The sports activity vehicle is equipped with a 2.0 litre four - cylinder BMW TwinPower Turbo engine, offering 184 hp and 270 Nm for output numbers, and performance figures include a 0 - 100 km / h time of 8.6 seconds and a claimed fuel consumption of 7.5 l per 100 km.
Fuel economy is much more impressive in the cheaper GS 300h, returning a claimed 64.2 mpg, while the GS 450h should return up to 46.3 mpg, although in truth we struggled to get more than 40mpg, let alone match the official figure of the GS 450h F Sport.
With an all - electric range of up to 31 miles, the E-Hybrid model claims an official fuel consumption figure of 113mpg and slots into the company - car - friendly 13 % Benefit - in - Kind (BiK) band.
It does, however slurp fuel, with the recorded test figure showing 9.1 L / 100 km, some 1.8 over the claim.
The manufacturer claims an ADR combined - cycle fuel consumption figure of 6.3 L / 100 km with CO2 emissions of 165g / km.
Coupled with a nine - speed automatic that shuffles drive to all four wheels, the S 63 claims a 0 - 100 km / h time of just 3.5 seconds, a top speed of 250km / h and a claimed fuel consumption figure of 9.3 L / 100 km combined.
Auto idle - stop is standard and Honda claims an ECE Combined fuel economy figure of 10L / 100 km for the NSX.
The 355bhp petrol - engined M40i gets to 62mph in 4.8 seconds and has claimed fuel economy of around 31mpg, while the equivalent figures on the diesel M40d are 322bhp, 4.9 seconds and 44.1 mpg.
The 138bhp version of this engine, despite its boost in power, returns the same claimed economy figures, so you shouldn't be paying any more in terms of fuel costs for the faster version, and business users will incur BIK tax at the same rate with both engines.
In terms of fuel efficiency, the claimed figure is 14.2 km / l but we managed to extract 5 - 6 km / l under hard driving and 8 - 9 km / l under relaxed driving.
Plus, with claimed economy figures 23 / 31mpg for the city and highway respectively for the rear - wheel drive models (or 22/28 for Q50 2.0 t variants that comes with the optional all - wheel drive system), the Infiniti is fairly frugal — though it's worth pointing out that the like - for - like BMW 3 Series, Mercedes - Benz C - Class and Audi A4 are, on paper at least, able to go that bit further per gallon of fuel.
Not that it's hard to return good fuel economy with the diesels: Fiat claims a 68.9 mpg combined figure, while the petrol engine records an official figure of 42.8 mpg.
One must be careful when presented with claims about this motorcycle or that attaining «63.5 mpg US», or some other fuel economy figure.
So the 1.6 - liter units (both gasoline and diesel) had lost some of their displacement while boasting better fuel consumption and power figures — up to 15 % more efficient, Ford claims.
Downsizing has also resulted in some rather impressive fuel economy figures: the official stats claim the front - wheel - drive Mazda CX - 9 can return 22mpg in the city and 28mpg on the highway, with all - wheel - drive models sacrificing just one mpg in both categories for their superior on - paper abilities in more adverse weather conditions.
The engine is quiet and almost inaudible when travelling at any speed, while the claimed fuel economy figure is well within reach if driven with efficiency in mind.
On the other hand, the 1.6 l diesel will hit the ton in 11.3 s and deliver a claimed fuel economy figure of 22.7 kmpl.
While the official fuel efficiency figures have not been declared, Hyundai claims that the new Creta is more fuel efficient by 3 % (petrol) and up to 4 % (diesel).
Thanks to the smaller engine, the claimed fuel efficiency figure has gone up to 19.20 km / l.
We've reviewed it separately and business users will love the 9 % BiK bracket that its 38g / km official emissions enable, but real - world use away from city traffic is likely to return a fuel - efficiency figure some way short of its claimed 166mpg.
The 79bhp 1.2 - litre engine returns a claimed average of 57.mpg and emits 115g / km of CO2, while the high - power engine actually returns better fuel economy figures, of 68.9 mpg and 95g / km of CO2.
Toyota claims the Corolla Hybrid will return a fuel efficiency figure of almost 23 km / l.
While AMG has yet to cite weight data for each model, the Coupe claims an NEDC fuel - consumption combined figure of 9.5 litres / 100 km (or 217 grams / km of CO2), while the Cabriolet drinks 9.8 litres / 100 km (223 grams / km).
BMW claims that the new model returns an impressive fuel efficiency figure of 22.69 kmpl.
Fuel economy is promising especially for a petrol powered vehicle; the claimed mileage figure for Kwid is 25.17 kms in a litre.