These «second - generation» bioenergy crops are often seen as the future of bioenergy because, as perennials, they are far better at storing carbon in the soil and in their biomass than traditional
fuel crops like corn and canola.
Not exact matches
But increasingly farmers also sell biomass — the residue left over after
crops like corn and wheat are harvested — to companies developing
fuel from organic material.
Nearly half the world's population rely on solid
fuels like wood and
crop residue to cook.
The fiber and
fuel derived from hemp would be carbon neutral and as such wouldn't contribute to global warming — and in fact could help mitigate rising temperatures by replacing chemical - intensive
crops like cotton and imported fossil
fuels like oil and gas.
Like bankers do for financial debt, climate scientists assume that the greenhouse gas expense of burning biofuels will be paid back eventually as the
crops that make
fuel «earn» carbon through sequestering it throughout their life cycle.
But the problem is that most of the ethanol we have right now is when it is talked about it being a first generation biofuel; that is that ethanol
fuel is coming from the fermentation of sugars from
crops like corn.
AltAir does better by sourcing its bio — jet
fuel from oil seed — bearing plants,
like camelina, but that limits the amount that can be planted in rotation with food
crops like wheat given constraints on the amount of land available for the latter.
Instead of processing commodities that might otherwise be used for food, next generation
fuels can be produced from dedicated energy
crops like switchgrass, to the non-edible parts of corn plants, to unmarketable wood from the lumber industry — taking resources that would otherwise go to waste and using them to
fuel our energy independence.
Other biomass - based
fuels, however, are genuinely sustainable —
fuels derived from things
like crop waste, or switchgrass, or sustainably harvested cover
crops.
The current
crop of hybrids includes cars
like this Accord, the Chevy Malibu, the Hyundai Sonata, etc., that, while not returning Prius -
like economy numbers, also look and drive more or less
like conventional
fuel - burning cars.
A better title would have been: «
Fueled: The Effects of Using Food for
Fuel» or something like that, because the central question of the book is to what degree has using crops to produce biomass for fuel production (usually ethanol) affected the costs of food and f
Fuel» or something
like that, because the central question of the book is to what degree has using
crops to produce biomass for
fuel production (usually ethanol) affected the costs of food and f
fuel production (usually ethanol) affected the costs of food and
fuelfuel.
Rich sees the technology that converts perennial
crops like Miscanthus into low - carbon
fuels as a science that could «change the world,» and is understandably excited at the prospects of utilizing non-food based biofuels as one solution to oil use.
Ethanol is an alcohol - based alternative
fuel made through a distillation and fermentation process using plant
crops,
like corn.
Another critic argues that the studies fail to consider no - till cultivation of biofuel
crops, which actually increase soil carbon storage, and that corn ethanol plants are converting to renewable energy, thus decreasing their emissions - meanwhile they are competing against fossil
fuels like oil from tar sands that have an increased carbon footprint even compared to conventional gasoline.
Biofuels also are contributing to the hikes but mainly because the EU and the United States are subsidizing domestic production of
crops like corn that offer low efficiency when turned into
fuel and compete with other foodstuffs for large swathes of land in these already densely populated areas, Clini said.
In other words, cellulosic conversion technology could easily drive deforestation, especially in the tropics where converting natural systems to
fuel would be easier than planting potential
fuel -
crops like oil palm, sugar cane, soybeans, or corn.