Not exact matches
Some of the new nuclear science research programs, including the one at MIT, are studying new reactor designs and
fuel cycles that scientists (and policy - makers) hope will make nuclear plants
safer and cheaper to operate, and produce waste materials with smaller volume, shorter half - lives, and less appeal to terrorists and other would - be nuclear powers.
Finally, if we close the
fuel cycle and recycle spent
fuel, then it decays to
safe levels in several hundred years rather than hundreds of thousands.
The thorium
fuel cycle is so efficient and
safe that thorium could have delivered much of what fusion power promised.
What happened in the fifties and sixties is that instead of pursuing a cheap
safe nuclear option we chose to pursue dirty inefficient light water reactors because the uranium
fuel cycle produces bomb grade materials
Fast reactors feature in Russia's long - term nuclear energy plans, which envisage a move to inherently
safe nuclear plants using fast reactors with a closed
fuel cycle and mixed - oxide (MOX)
fuel.