Sentences with phrase «fuel debate with»

With the release of the Series III edition of the 380 large sedan (more here), Mitsubishi has jumped into the alternative fuel debate with both feet.

Whilst the media fuels the debate with sensationalist articles which highlight criticism of mums breastfeeding, we must remember that they concentrate on the stories that create the discord rather then celebrate the positive everyday experiences which go without comment.

Not exact matches

Debating whether climate policy can fuel economic growth, with Christopher Horner, «The Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming & Environmentalism» author & Competitive Enterprise Institute; Chris Miller, Greenpeace global warming campaign director and CNBC's Becky Quick

«In my own opinion this debate is fuelled by an overoptimism in what can be achieved with AI algorithms, as well as an underestimating of how intelligent people really are.

- LIE, you are actually talking about yourself, you're the one that continues to fuel this debate over and over again with your uneducated prejudice opinions about the gay community.

One topic of continued debate among parents is co-sleeping, or bed - sharing, a common practice in countries outside the U.S. Fueled by increasing evidence, however, more pediatricians and sleep experts are dissuading parents from sharing a bed or a bedroom with their babies, recommending instead that babies be allowed to learn how to fall asleep and stay asleep on their own.

The problem with this debate, fueled by constant studies and subsequent breathless media coverage, is this: America's home - birth data are incomplete.

My problem with all of this is that it's yet another lobotomy for our political debate, fuelled by the increasingly common spasms of outrage in both traditional and social media.

And, inevitably, it will add fuel to the debate currently raging about both the way political parties are funded - with demands for some level of state funding - and political patronage, particularly the appointment of peers.

The findings, reported today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, add to a burgeoning debate over the climate impact of replacing oil - and coal - fired power plants with those fuelled by natural gas.

The increase in use of so called ride - sharing services — which allow prospective passengers to use a cell phone app to connect with owner - operator drivers — fuels debate over whether they can be a safer method of travel.

In the cost / adapt or mitigate debate we have a global choice; deal with fossil fuels and mitigate - this is a finite cost as fossil fuels are finite.

ANITA / U.S.A. (Director: Freida Mock)-- Anita Hill, an African - American woman, charges Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas with sexual harassment in explosive Senate hearings in 1991 — bringing sexual politics into the national consciousness and fueling 20 years of international debate on the issues.

The initiative inspires students with free online learning courses from leading universities, giving students access to ideas, debates and resources to help improve critical thinking and learning skills, either to fuel their independent study, enrich their current curriculum or prepare themselves for university.

It's a debate likely to be fueled this week with Gov. Chris Christie's expected announcement of a compromise proposal.

Adding fuel to the debate over what exactly defines an e-reader, the Tab comes with three e-reader apps preinstalled: PressDisplay for news, Kobo for e-books, and Zinio for magazines.

The framework of the game encourages users to debate the issues with the wider community and for once you get the feeling that there is enough information available in the game to fuel a really constructive dialogue.

Fueling it by coming up with random debates & discussions That'll totally solve the problem / sarcasm

Fueled by the Electronic Arts's disastrous reception of the SimCity in February 2013, the rumors immediately sparked online debates about «always - on» gaming, with many arguing that gamers shouldn't be forced to have a stable Internet connection to play games they have purchased.

She conjured up the roiling, riotous art camp that was East 10th Street in the 1950s, her home before this one; the leaky, cold - water lofts that she, Mr. Resnick, Franz Kline, Willem de Kooning and other members of the New York School colonized; the endless coffee fueling the endless, passionate debates; the feuds and factions; and the constant, hilarious presence of the F.B.I., trawling for the operators of the Mafia gambling dens the artists unwittingly shared space with.

The first New York issue contained three seminal essays: Michael Fried's «Art and Objecthood,» along with Robert Morris's «Notes on Sculpture,» and Sol LeWitt's «Paragraphs on Conceptual Art,» that added the fuel to the ongoing and intense debate on the war between formalism and minimalism.

As with all things art, interpretation and debate fuel the fire.

In the first weeks of this 10th anniversary year of the September 11th attacks and the subsequent invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, with global economic and political policies fueling conflict and prompting revolt, there have been numerous programs, talks, and debates around the city about walls: metaphorical walls created by censorship, physical walls dividing Israeli and Palestinian territories or Mexican borders, but also boundaries that some artists insist are essential to maintaining the integrity of cultural expression and identity.

Every year at this time Hong Kong's social life goes into overdrive with a whirlwind of more than 25 gallery openings, charity art auctions, debates and champagne - fueled parties held on warehouse rooftops, at poolsides and parking garages.

In the cost / adapt or mitigate debate we have a global choice; deal with fossil fuels and mitigate - this is a finite cost as fossil fuels are finite.

Several influential people in the national debate on climate said that whatever legislative proposals come next, they must guarantee that polluters pay, while average citizens are protected from the higher energy costs that would unavoidably come with a fast move away from burning fossil fuels.

Justin Gillis has written a news article putting the paper in context with other recent research on Antarctic dynamics and sea level, as well as with policy debates about the current value of fossil fuels against the momentous costs that could attend greatly expanded use:

As you might expect in a debate about whether or not the U.S. should make a risky move to perpetuate the use of fossil fuels, some committee members took the opportunity to voice doubt that the constant burning of that energy source was behind the rising temperatures, melting ice sheets, and abnormal weather events most scientists associate with climate change.

This component of the debate is what fuels right wing opposition to the «warmists», not any dispute with the science.

The food versus fuel debate has put large - scale biofuel production in a squeeze in recent years, but competition with food crops is just one drawback for which biofuel crop production is criticised.

The biofuels / ethanol debate has moved over to National Journal's Energy Experts Blog, with this week's posts addressing whether the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) that mandates biofuel use should be left alone, amended or repealed.

Combined with the growing understanding that carbon emissions from the combustion of fossil fuels are driving global climate change, the debate is now focused on how to restructure the U.S. transport system to solve these two problems.

THERE is little grey area or middle - ground in often heated debates, with the CAGW camp blaming the burning of fossil fuels, namely coal, not only for a > 1 degree celsius warming of the atmosphere since 1850, but on literally anything and everything that moves, shifts, spins or tilts upon contact with colourless, odourless, tasteless, non-reactive, trace gas and plant food carbon dioxide!

Before the show had even gone to air, the program was causing controversy with commentators — myself and others including Clive Hamilton, Stephan Lewandowsky and Michael Ashley — pointing out its format gave the false impression of there being a legitimate scientific debate about fossil fuel burning causing climate change.

Its supplemental online interview of the late IPCC scientist Dr Stephen Schneider quoted his opinion about the Global Climate Coalition as being «a coalition of liars and spin doctors to reposition the debate onto the issue of uncertainty, way beyond [what] the scientific community agreed with» (he probably meant to say it was the Western Fuels Association, out to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact», an error I note at item 17 here).

'' As he sees it, there are three groups with a common cause in the debate over fossil fuels and they are wasting time arguing unnecessarily with one another.

Often, the debate is presented as if the only question is how high, and how fast does the carbon price need to climb in order to substitute existing fossil fuel technologies with clean energy technologies, whilst also maintaining economic growth.

With cap and trade on ice in Washington — regional programs exist in California and the Northeast — the oxygen fueling climate debates was sucked out of Capitol Hill as fast as air vacates a popped balloon.

Would this happen more often, more broadly, so as to enable a rational debate on the best ways to replace fossil fuels with renewable, clean and endless supplies.

While apparently not wanting to «get into the science debate,» Climate Litigation Watch says the science linking fossil fuel producers to climate change is «dubious» — a position at odds with every major scientific academy on the planet.

Needless to say this has been deeply disturbing to an «ordinary Joe» (with 5 grandchildren) who has made an effort to understand the science and the politics that underlie the climate change «debate», especially since my country has become such an important player in the fossil fuel business with its tarsands and pipeline industries that affect us all, so I've tried to find out more about Judith Curry's recent contributions to the debate, not so much the hair - splitting, angels on the head of a pin, esoteric dissections of graphs and stats that I see here on your website but the ethical stance that you take on the larger issue of «killing» the IPCC and all it represents.

Mazza also addresses concerns around the food versus fuel debate, acknowledging that there is a very real concern when energy needs start to compete with the need of folks to eat, but he also points out that, contrary to recent headlines, fuels are hardly the only factor driving up the price of food:

While such a program won't do anything to extinguish the «carbon neutral: good or bad» debate (and may only add fuel to the fire), shipping is a huge, dirty industry, and we think it'd be awfully nice to be able to move, ship furniture and more with a cleaner conscience.

At the heart of philosophical debate of how we can best mobilize industry to deal with climate change lies one single dirty fuel source: coal.

I do wish that people would be careful with this stuff, for it is important; part of that care might well extend to passing review prior to publication, press release, and fuelling debate.

What I am talking about is, that it seems to me that with regard to climate science, this blog spends far too much time responding to the phony, trumped - up «debate» fueled by denialist drivel, and not enough time addressing the legitimate scientific question as to whether it is in fact too late to prevent global warming and climate change that will be catastrophic to human civilization, not to mention the entire Earth's biosphere.

While I don't deny that the researchers reveal an important side to the home - cooking debate that is raging in North America right now, fueled by passionately idealistic food writers and locavores on one side and pushed back by low - income families, Big Ag, and the processed food industry on the other side, the basic argument that «home cooking isn't for everyone» just doesn't sit well with me.

In the UK, the whole debate over the proposed raise in fuel duty (3p a litre), has been over the politics and «economics» of it (with a 19th paragraph quote form FOE in the BBC).

With no intention to fuel the age - old Android vs. iOS debate, the fact that Android allows more freedom to its developers, sometimes becomes a crutch rather than a helping hand.

Beyond this, having the fingerprint on the front of the display as shown in this patent may further fuel debate surrounding notches, which companies like Essential with its Ph - 1 and Apple have embraced.