Sentences with phrase «fuel economy benefits not»

Not exact matches

The familiar 2.0 - liter turbocharged four - cylinder can't quite match the output or refinement of its larger - displacement competitors, but it's nonetheless smooth and potent and offers the fuel economy benefits one would expect of a smaller engine (better than the BMW by a combined 3 mpg, and better than the Cadillac by 2 mpg).
It benefits not just performance against the clock, but fuel economy, too.
Well all bets are with the» so called» president in the oval office all semblance of fuel economy and efficiency are about to go out the window as he rips the EPA to shreds to the benefit of Big Oil... that at least here in the (not so) Good (anymore) Ole US of A bigger will reign supreme with concerns about efficiency and emissions once again going by the wayside.
Although EPA ratings are not yet available, the X6 will also benefit from better fuel economy.
If you'd rather pay a little more money for better fuel economy, the RX 450h hybrid isn't a bad way to do it, with just as much power on tap when you need it, but the added benefit of limited EV operation when you don't.
5w20 conventional is recommened most likely for fuel economy benefits but this is not the issue with durability.
Enhanced performance and fuel economy are not the only noticeable benefits: above all, it represents a major reduction in unsprung and rotating masses.
The engine is not the only one responsible for the fuel economy ratings, with the F - 150 3.0 - liter Power Stroke diesel also benefitting from a lightweight aluminum - alloy body and a 10 - speed SelectShift automatic transmission.
26 MPG Hwy ** Safety equipment includes: ABS, Traction control, Curtain airbags, Passenger Airbag, Stability control - Stability control with anti-roll... Other features include: Auto, Tilt and telescopic steering wheel, 4 Doors, Fuel economy EPA highway (mpg): 26 and EPA city (mpg): 19, RWD... Ford Certified Pre-Owned means that you not only get the reassurance of a 12Mo / 12, 000 Mile Comprehensive Warranty, but also up to a 7 - Year / 100, 000 - Mile Powertrain Limited Warranty, a 172 - point inspection / reconditioning, 24 hr roadside assistance, trip - interruption services, rental car benefits, and a complete vehicle history report.
It might not be all - aluminum for cost reasons, but using aluminum body panels would boost both fuel economy and performance while helping the Blue Oval reap the financial benefits of economies of scale.
Though it's not inherently a bad feature, we feel the traction benefits are outweighed by its cost ($ 1,850) and impact to fuel economy (26 / 31mpg for the city and highway respectively, versus the front - wheel drive Juke's claimed 28 / 32mpg ratings).
That said, Sunders also added that while the thought of a hybrid - powered Atom is intriguing in and of itself, Ariel isn't prioritizing the benefits of reduced emissions and improved fuel economy like Honda is doing.
Combine the sailing capability with the top two overdrive gears of the transmission and the benefit is a gain in highway fuel economy, a result not associated with hybrids.
Benefit - in - Kind (BiK) figures of 30 to 33 % aren't likely to appeal to business users, making the Q50 much more costly than the Lexus IS (18 % BiK) or BMW 330e iPerformance and Mercedes C350e plug - in hybrids, which both have BiK of 9 % and fuel economy of more than 130mpg.
While it does heavily benefit fuel economy and doesn't cut into cabin space, the hybrid system has to have some place to store all of those batteries, and unfortunately that place is under the floor of the trunk.
The 1.5 - litre dCi 90 diesel Captur is the most economical model and while Renault hasn't released fuel economy figures yet for the 2018 version, CO2 emissions of 138g / km give it a 32 % Benefit - in - Kind (BiK) rating for company - car drivers.
Meanwhile, the Kodiaq's official fuel economy and CO2 emissions aren't as appealing as an equivalent Peugeot 5008's, but are similar to the Sorento's; bear this in mind if you're a company car driver looking for cheaper benefit - in - kind tax.
Both come with the flexibility and fuel economy benefits of six forward ratios regardless of whether buyers want to shift for themselves or not.
CDR helps enable a cost - effective transition to a decarbonized economy: Today, environmental advocates claim that prolonged use of fossil fuels is mutually exclusive with preventing climate change, and fossil fuel advocates bash renewables as not ready for «prime time» — i.e. unable to deliver the economic / development benefits of inexpensive fossil energy.
We don't know whether what you claim are benefits of «cheap» fossil fuels can really be attributed to their low cost or not, as we can't go back and check on every case as its price impacts work their way through the economy, nor can we speculate about foregone benefits, or whether the benefits are due to the artificially reduced price of burning carbon or whether people would enjoy them (or even greater benefits) in a fair market, except by examining by Capitalist analysis.
We can at that time know what was and was not a benefit of «cheap» fossil fuels by seeing what benefits people choose freely to give up and what benefits they choose freely to replace them with in an economy with the same net budget (as the government doesn't take a penny of the fees and the buyers get all the dividends).
Because renewables do not require fuel and because they are based on technologies that benefit from both advancement and economies of scale, they are able to continuously increase efficiency and reduce cost over time.
The four key differences are: 1) unlike the Energy Policy Conservation Act (EPCA), the CAA [Clean Air Act] allows for the crediting of direct emission reductions and indirect fuel economy benefits from improved air conditioners, allowing for greater compliance flexibility and lower costs; 2) EPCA allows Flexible Fuel Vehicle (FFV) credits through model year 2019, whereas the EPA standard requires demonstration of actual use of a low carbon fuel after model year 2015; 3) EPCA allows for the payment of fines in lieu of compliance but the CAA does not; and 4) treatment of intra firm trading of compliance credits between cars and light trucks categoriefuel economy benefits from improved air conditioners, allowing for greater compliance flexibility and lower costs; 2) EPCA allows Flexible Fuel Vehicle (FFV) credits through model year 2019, whereas the EPA standard requires demonstration of actual use of a low carbon fuel after model year 2015; 3) EPCA allows for the payment of fines in lieu of compliance but the CAA does not; and 4) treatment of intra firm trading of compliance credits between cars and light trucks categorieFuel Vehicle (FFV) credits through model year 2019, whereas the EPA standard requires demonstration of actual use of a low carbon fuel after model year 2015; 3) EPCA allows for the payment of fines in lieu of compliance but the CAA does not; and 4) treatment of intra firm trading of compliance credits between cars and light trucks categoriefuel after model year 2015; 3) EPCA allows for the payment of fines in lieu of compliance but the CAA does not; and 4) treatment of intra firm trading of compliance credits between cars and light trucks categories.50
Don't Break Out the Champagne Yet More on PHEVS We Wuv PHEVs Ultimate Benefits of PHEVs Will Depend on Fuel Economy of Vehicles Plug - In Hybrids Could Help Stabilize The Grid
It might not be all - aluminum for cost reasons, but using aluminum body panels would boost both fuel economy and performance while helping the Blue Oval reap the financial benefits of economies of scale.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z