The 1.5 - litre dCi 90 diesel Captur is the most economical model and while Renault hasn't released
fuel economy figures yet for the 2018 version, CO2 emissions of 138g / km give it a 32 % Benefit - in - Kind (BiK) rating for company - car drivers.
GM hasn't released
fuel economy figures yet, but it could offer as much as 50 mpg.
We don't have Canadian
fuel economy figures yet, but expect modest gains.
Not exact matches
EPA
fuel economy figures aren't
yet available, but, oddly, the diesel doesn't get the auto stop / start system now standard in the GLK350.
Though exact numbers aren't out
yet, Volvo has at least confirmed its new T8 twin - engine plug - in hybrid powertrain will be available — it develops 395bhp in the XC90 with a 0 - 60 time of 5.6 seconds and a combined
fuel economy figure of 112.9 mpg.
Mazda does not
yet have EPA
fuel economy ratings for the new 6, but the company is hoping for best - in - class
figures.
Official
fuel -
economy figures have not
yet been released, however.SafetyLoads of new available safety equipment join the A8 and S8 features lists this year.
The other important set of specifications not
yet finalized are the M Hybrid's
fuel economy figures.
Pricing and
fuel -
economy figures are not
yet available (they'll be announced at the Detroit auto show in January), but
figure low $ 60s for a base 540i M Sport and a
fuel - efficiency bump of about 10 percent.
It's claimed to reach 62mph in 5.1 sec and run on to 155mph, but as
yet Audi hasn't confirmed
fuel economy or CO2
figures for the model.
Fuel economy is likely to rise by 8 or 9 percent, but EPA
figures have not
yet been established.
Ford is reportedly making revisions to the 2014 C - Max's powertrain to increase
fuel economy, but official EPA
figures for the 2014 model have not
yet been released.
Fuel economy figures aren't available for the 4 - cylinder
yet, but they are expected to beat the V6's best of 25 mpg on the highway.
While Volvo has
yet to release official
fuel economy figures for the 2016 XC90 T8 plug - in hybrid, we're certain it will beat out the GL450 4MATIC's EPA - rated
figures of 17 MPG city and 21 MPG highway and will likely offer better
fuel economy than even the 2016 Volvo XC90 T6.
Mitsubishi didn't reveal output and
fuel economy figures for the NA - spec 2017 Outlander PHEV
yet, but they should be similar with those from Europe and Japan.
No
fuel economy figures are available for the 1.5 - litre TSI just
yet, but the new engine features cylinder deactivation technology, with an official CO2
figure of 120g / km.
Land Rover's 4.4 - liter V8 packs the power and smoothness we expect from a Land Rover,
yet delivers EPA
fuel economy figures which are nearly as good as those of the discontinued V6.
All - electric range is listed as approximately 27 miles on the Euro test cycle at up to 83 mph — official U.S. EPA
fuel economy and electric range
figures aren't out
yet.
Fuel -
economy figures and prices have not been announced
yet — we got an early taste of the Atlas in the frozen Canadian north, where snowmobiles are normal commuting means — but VW expects the five trim levels of the Atlas to range from $ 30,000 to $ 48,000, roughly paralleling popular competitors like the Ford Explorer and Toyota Highlander.
But not all is odious: the new Mini also gets a three - cylinder engine, something parent BMW has threatened for a while, that promises 134 hp and better
fuel economy figures — not
yet announced — than the outgoing four.
Although Mercedes - Benz has not released
fuel economy figures for this vehicle
yet, they should come in very high, and beat anything in its segment.
In the US,
fuel economy figures have not been released
yet.
Power for the Terrain is supplied by a robust in - line four cylinder engine that is more about
fuel efficiency than power and speed; if the later is important, the 3.0 - liter V6 has power to spare
yet still returns
fuel economy figures in the mid-20s.
While EPA
figures aren't
yet available in regards to
fuel efficiency, MINI has equipped its Paceman with brake - energy regeneration and auto start - stop technology to help maximize
fuel economy — though it's not clear if both will be offered in North America.
Porsche isn't revealing official U.S. EPA
fuel economy or electric range
figures yet.
The 0 - 100 km / h increment is listed at 6.4 seconds,
yet the oiler's EU Combined
fuel economy figure is an impressive 5.5 L / 100 km.
The S4 Avant, with its turbocharged 3.0 - litre V6, also achieves a claimed
fuel economy of 37.6 mpg and 175g / km CO2 emissions, compared with the 38.1 mpg, and under 170g / km CO2 Audi claims for the S4 saloon, although Audi has stated that these
figures are not
yet officially confirmed.
The Anniversary 208 GTi is able to accelerate to 100km / h in 6.5 sec (6.8 for the regular 208 GTi) which makes it the fastest of the bunch,
yet according to the official
figures it's also cleaner and more economical with a combined
fuel consumption of 5.4 L / 100 km and a CO2
figure of 125g / km (our test car fell well short of the claimed
economy figures at 7.5 L / 100 km).
Final
figures for
fuel -
economy and electric range have not been released
yet.
That's a smidge swifter than the 3.3 - seconds Mercedes - AMG claims for the E63 S. EPA
fuel economy figures aren't available
yet for the new drivetrain pairing, but BMW officials says it will better the 14 mpg city and 20 mpg highway ratings the old car got with the dual - clutch.
It provides a 0 - 100 kmh time of just 7.8 seconds,
yet its official
fuel consumption is as low as 4.6 litres per 100 km on the open road cycle and with a combined
fuel figure of 5.8 litres per 100 km, it is as all but an
economy car, something also illustrated by its CO2
figure of 134 gm per km.
With that in mind, the engine is now supposed to be more efficient thanks to less friction, but
fuel economy figures for comparison have
yet to be released.
Fuel economy figures for that specific model have not
yet been released, though Chrysler estimates around 35 mpg on the highway.
Official EPA
fuel economy figures are not
yet available, but Subaru projects that the 2013 Outback 2.5 i with the Lineartronic CVT will achieve 24 - mpg city / 30 mpg highway / 26 mpg combined, up compared with the 22/29/24 for the 2012 model.