It's perhaps also worth noting that that the pace of fossil
fuel export emission growth in Australia is accelerating rather than contracting, in spite of a carbon tax and a resources tax.
Not exact matches
Updated below, 12:51 p.m. A comprehensive and sobering Associated Press story by Dina Cappiello provides a valuable update on how United States policies promoting
exports of coal are undercutting domestic efforts to restrict
emissions of carbon dioxide, the heat - trapping gas released when fossil
fuels are burned.
The graph above, from the Dutch report, shows clearly how relentless overall
emissions growth in countries climbing out of poverty (as electrification, manufacturing and mobility expand fossil
fuel demand) was not blunted by the recession and is sending them and the rich world (which is getting ever more efficient and
exporting manufacturing) toward some kind of carbon common ground.
Factor in the «carbon light» CO2 from coal seam gas projects in the East (and other LNG expansion in the north and west) and you're talking about Australia's fossil
fuel emission exports equating to TWO Saudi Arabias by 2020, not one as I've been saying to many disbelieving ears.
The UNFCCC framework sees every country working to abate its domestic
emissions or maybe reducing
emissions elsewhere to offset them but not dealing with
exports of fossil
fuels and how they are used elsewhere.
At the same time the study showcased how wind energy can dramatically cut
emissions, save billions in fossil
fuel costs and generate new
export opportunities.
Any domestic
emissions cuts will be far outweighed by planned exponential growth of fossil
fuel exports.
Finally, we learned Australia must support its carbon price with other new and existing policies to address domestic
emissions, and start phasing out its fossil
fuel exports.
Domestic
emissions are only one part of Australia's contribution to climate change, which also includes
emissions from the burning of fossil
fuel exports (which dwarf domestic
emissions) and
emissions from the manufacture of imported products.
Proposed Australian coal
export projects collectively have been identified as the second largest proposed expansion of fossil
fuel CO2
emissions after Chinese coal mining.
According to IPCC carbon accounting conventions, the carbon
emissions from burning
exported fossil
fuels are assigned to the country where they are burned.
In «Dirty Deals ``, Friends of the Earth Europe and other environmental groups reveal how U.S. negotiators at the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership talks work to undermine the EU's
Fuel Quality Directive and unleash
exports of dirty
fuels, including tar sands oil, a highly intensive source of greenhouse gas
emissions.
This was followed by a session delving into the market realities of high wind integration in Alberta, including the findings of CanWEA's ground - breaking Pan-Canadian Wind Integration Study, which demonstrated how Canada can get more than one - third of its electricity from wind energy without compromising grid reliability, and at the same time dramatically cut
emissions, save billions in fossil
fuel costs and generate new
export opportunities.
Five future reports are planned on how to eliminate
emissions from other sectors (Transport, Buildings, Land Use and Agriculture, Industrial Processes, and Replacing Fossil
Fuel Export Revenue).
A 2014 Department of Energy study found that
exporting U.S. LNG will reduce global greenhouse gas
emissions, because U.S. natural gas consumed in Europe or Asia has lower life - cycle GHG
emissions than power generation from locally sourced fossil
fuels.
Currently, officials estimate national fossil
fuel - related
emissions by what is burned (known as production) within a nation, but this approach underestimates the
emissions contributions from countries that extract oil and oil for
export.
Australia should aim for zero
emissions unconditional on international action, start phasing out its fossil
fuel exports, and play a constructive role in climate talks.