Sentences with phrase «fuel extraction does»
We already know we are moving to a low - carbon economy, so any new investment into expensive fossil - fuel extraction doesn't make much sense.
http://www.corporateknights.com/ Not exact matches
Canada is a Petro State that would be wise to gradually manage a decline in fossil fuel extraction, as other countries should also be doing, and many are, as we transition to a post-carbon economy (in some countries, even the US, this economy is booming.)
Estimates of GHG emissions do not include additional «lifecycle» emissions related to transportation, such as the extraction and refining of fuel and the manufacture of vehicles, which are also a significant source of domestic and international GHG emissions.
She's declared that banning fossil fuel extraction on public lands is: «a done deal.»
Apparently, as Julia Olson points out, they do not want to count permits for extraction, drilling, exports and imports, transmission lines and pipelines, all to accommodate the fossil fuel energies, as part of the totality of national energy policies that the defendants are responsible for.
However, if the narrative shifts to new fossil fuel extraction, that does not help the problem at all.
We need the transition to be fast enough to avoid the worst effects of climate change, and to be delivered in a way that doesn't replicate the injustices and human right violations of fossil fuel extraction and energy systems.
As many comparative studies have done before, the analysis includes an assessment of the environmental impacts associated with the fuel cycle (primary production, extraction, transportation, refining, and vehicle operation) for each of the modes includes in the tool.
If all new coal and gas extraction projects are slated for export, why do state and territory governments even consider allowing new fossil fuel extraction projects despite the climate imperative of keeping fossil fuels in the ground, and despite often fierce community opposition?
The Paris Agreement introduced the concept of «carbon neutrality» which allows business as usual, shifts the responsibility, and doesn't stop fossil fuel extraction like we need (while at the same time opening the door for dangerous geoengineering which is not safe or proven).
The kid plaintiffs, ages 9 to 20, allege the federal government is doing far too little to keep dangerous global warming in check, and is actually creating warming by leasing federal property for fossil fuel extraction.
Upcycling, absent a cap on primary material extraction, does not close industrial loops so much as it fuels environmental exploitation
We don't shy away from the depressing parts, which is how dire the situation is, especially for communities living on the front lines of fossil fuel extraction.