Sentences with phrase «fuel funded denial»

Perhaps he really doesn't know better (although a man in his position certainly ought to know better), and has just repeated what he saw on a fossil - fuel funded denial group's website, or heard at an ALEC conference.

Which could include an analysis of the rhetoric from the fossil fuel funded denial machine, ala Frank Luntz.

Not exact matches

With generic solutions like «consume less» and «vote better», the film mostly avoids controversy... though it does acknowledge the slick and well - funded «campaign of denial» by those who profit mightily from a fossil - fuel dependent world.

94 Secular said, «So, for the fossil fuel corporations who funded the AGW denial propaganda campaign, the question would be «What did they know, and when did they know it?

What is more important is that the fossil - fuel industry knew about the danger in the 1970s, perhaps even the 1960s, and what they did about it was to fund a massive campaign of denial.

Cramer has a long record of climate change denial (apropos of nothing, over his career Cramer has received more than a half million bucks in funding from the fossil fuel industry, more than twice as much as any other industry).

The exxon funded fossil fuel denial thing is just a pr consrtuct anyway, to close down debate.

The largest, most - consistent money fueling the climate denial movement are a number of well - funded conservative foundations built with so - called «dark money,» or concealed donations, according to an analysis released Friday afternoon.

Into this scene enter serial data deleter Patrick Michaels and his fossil fuel - funded Cato Institute political think tank, which have released a voluminous report attempting to undermine the endangerment finding, with their misguided efforts of course being promoted by the usual climate denial enablers.

After Britain's Royal Society sent a letter criticizing the company for spreading «inaccurate and misleading» views on climate science and funding denial in September, Exxon made what is believed to be its first public acknowledgement that fossil fuels are a «major source» of climate - changing emissions.

Joseph, why don't you give up up on the «fossil fuel companies funding all this denial» theory?

3) «Climate Destruction Sponsors» — There are some extremely wealthy people, most of which have or have had substantial investments in fossil fuel extraction and sales who have funded climate science denial efforts by institutions such as the Competitive Enterprise Institute and the Heartland Institute as a means of delaying action on climate change.

It also says the companies «orchestrated a campaign of deception and denial regarding climate change» by funding efforts to discredit the science on climate change even though their scientists had warned them of the risks and the role of fossil fuels in causing it.

Senators Kaine, Sheldon Whitehouse (D - RI), and others have banded together to attack the alleged «web of denial» that appears to be made up only of conservative organizations that they claim are funded by ExxonMobil and other fossil fuel corporations that they consider immoral — even though the energy they provide has been indispensable to lifting and keeping billions of people out of poverty, and even though ExxonMobil has not given any of these groups a dime for a decade or more.

There is a denial industry funded by the fossil fuel companies that literally denies the science, and seeks to confuse the public.

The Heartland Institute, a think tank funded by the fossil fuel industry and infamous for backing ACD denial, recently distributed a non-science-based report denying the scientific consensus on ACD to elected officials.

Robert Balling, Idso's mentor, was one of the leading scientists paid by the Greening Earth Society, the climate science - denying front group created by the Western Fuels Association, one of the first and earliest coal industry groups funding the denial of climate change.

She recently participated in a forum held by the discredited, fossil - fuel funded George Marshall Institute, which advocates outright climate denial and has denied the link between tobacco and cancer in the past.

He is currently listed as an «expert» at the fossil fuel - funded Heartland Institute and is a regular speaker at Heartland's climate denial events.

Calls are growing louder to hold Exxon and other fossil fuel interests accountable for funding climate denial campaigns given their advanced understanding of climate science and the implications of CO2 pollution for the atmosphere going back many decades.

But we don't have that choice because the fossil fuel industry has funded a relentless campaign of climate denial and purchased political outcomes that forestall progress.

These days Morano runs the climate science denial blog Climate Depot, for which he is paid by the fossil fuel industry - funded Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT).

For a group apparently hooked on transparency, the latest organization to spring from the loins of the fossil fuel — funded climate science denial industry certainly manages to obscure one or two pertinent facts.

Organizations that actively block efforts to address climate change are funded by a large network of conservative donors to the tune of nearly $ 1 billion a year, according to the first in - depth study into the dark money that fuels the denial effort.

As more and more companies, organizations and governments align themselves behind a clean energy transition, the political forces that have maintained the status quo through supporting fossil fuel subsidies and funding climate denial become increasingly marginalized.

The fossil fuel industry has responded to these suits by fiercely waging a campaign that claims that any legal action against the fossil fuel companies for funding organizations engaged in climate change denial activities is tantamount to a legally inappropriate suppression of free speech (See: Climate change vs. free speech: Punishing fossil fuel companies for expressing doubt).