Michael is also right to point out that the fossil
fuel funded sceptics have cleverly kept the argument on whether global warming is happening and on its cause, thus diverting attention away from the dangers.
Not exact matches
Hobby sites like «WattsUpWithThat» are a start to effective opposition, but to be honest it really is time that the fossil
fuel industry who so many believers think are
funding the
sceptics, got off their backsides, put their hands in their pockets and did the decent thing to
fund the professional science «opposition» which is needed to force the climategate forecasters to stop feeding this monster with their PR and start to try to justify the existence of their monster based on real science in the face of real decently financed opposition and not part - time unpaid people like us here.
... The response of those industries was to mount a very successful campaign of disinformation, using a tiny handful of greenhouse
sceptics, most of whom failed to voluntarily disclose the fact that they were
funded by fossil
fuel interests.
And straying briefly into more dangerous territory, lukewarmers can and do remain highly critical of the IPCC, the hockey stick, the climategate fiasco, the Lewandowsky nonsense, and the bizarre idea that
sceptics are a bunch of «fossil
fuel funded deniers».
I joined the
sceptics because I was told there was a lot of
funding coming from the fossil
fuel lobby.