Well, the «surprise» will be that there is little to no evidence of any undeclared fossil
fuel funding influence the work or testimony of these individuals.
Not exact matches
One could frame the debate in the advantages of using less fossil
fuel, which range from lower costs to people (an all electric car has operating costs about 1/4 that of a gasoline vehicle), to balance of payments (less capital flowing out of the country, especially relevant to countries who import most of their oil), to terrorism (not
funding it, and western
influence leaving the ME, which is the basis of most ME terrorist organizations) to conflict in general (most of the major conflicts in the last 30 years have involved ME oil), to finite supply (when we run out, we'll be facing a global economic meltdown).
And it's very clear that the Koch Brothers, the largest privately held fossil
fuel interest and major
funders of the public relations campaign to deny and attack the science of climate change — they have a level of
influence now within the Trump Administration unlike anything we've ever seen before.»
Both groups has received
funding from ExxonMobil, so even indirectly, you have received some «
influence» or
funding from the fossil
fuel industry.
Because I accept the science and from what I can tell attempts to discredit the science are
funded by fossil
fuel industries funnelling money to think tanks, opinion bloggers and facebook pages in an effort to
influence the political process.
«attempts to discredit the science are
funded by fossil
fuel industries funnelling money to think tanks, opinion bloggers and facebook pages in an effort to
influence the political process»
Soon has previously stated that his fossil
fuel funding does not
influence his scientific work.
EPI's investigation reveals an ongoing effort by utilities and fossil
fuel interests to
influence public officials through university courses and conferences and
fund reports authored by academic staff to boost lobbying efforts targeting state government officials and decision makers.
during a floor speech in which he scrutinized the undue
influence of fossil
fuel funded climate deniers in Virginia.
Lord Deben was clearly and adamantly of the view that any criticism of the CCC's report in question has origins in a fossil
fuel industry -
funded conspiracy, which had even
influenced the editorial decisions of the Today Programme.