Not exact matches
If you're on track to be more than a mom - and - pop shop, it's essential to have a high - quality, accountable financial platform to effectively monitor the health of an organization,
fuel business decisions and open your company up to
growth capital.
Many high -
growth companies
fuelled by investment dollars were spending as
if they were about to raise another big round, he says.
p Firstly, it would simply be a new member service which, coupled with discounted
fuel offers, could help the club increase its membership from its existing 500,000 vehicles —
if growth is a target.
Street estimates finally look safe while Y / Y compares on iPhone units and overall AAPL revenue are bottoming in [calendar] Q1 and should turn flat to up as soon as [calendar] Q4 additionally
fueled by less severe [currency exchange] headwinds... iPhone 7 will benefit
if nothing else from the 6/6 + «echo» effect as these units enter the upgrade base, OLED in ’17 solves
growth concerns and builds a bridge to new «dreamy» form factors.
THE LOW ROAD: Even
if money isn't pouring in, stay focused on the business and look for other ways to
fuel growth.
Investors are waiting to see
if sustained economic
growth this year will give China's leaders the confidence to quicken and deepen reforms, though many say Beijing continues to rely too heavily on debt -
fueled stimulus.
If they can't drive revenue
growth internally, they'll likely look for it in acquisitions, adding further
fuel to healthcare M&A.
If you're business is busy during the summer months, the flexibility of a business line of credit can also help you take advantage of opportunities to
fuel growth during the busy months that could continue to generate revenue during a slower season.
There wouldn't be a an asset bubble either
if growth and wages
fueled inflation and that led to an interest rate rise.
Higher consumption
fuels economic
growth, so there are several implications for the economy and markets
if consumers spend less.
SEATTLE — For most of its life, Amazon sacrificed profits
if it could build another few warehouses to ship orders to customers more quickly or find some other investment to
fuel its
growth.
Strong corporate earnings
growth and global synchronous expansion have
fueled the past two years» rally and that dynamic is still in place even
if market valuations got stretched, says Wilson.
If you let your child follow the cues of her natural appetite, she'll eat what she needs to
fuel her
growth and development without overdoing it.
Growth spurts: If your newborn suddenly seems hungrier than usual, he's probably craving extra calories to fuel a growth
Growth spurts:
If your newborn suddenly seems hungrier than usual, he's probably craving extra calories to
fuel a
growth growth spurt.
If Palin does make a stab at presidential politics, she'll have a natural following among Tea Party activists, whose grassroots network is
fueled by anger over the
growth of the federal government and President Barack Obama's policies.
«
If we were to have such a thing,» he says, «it would be the sort of technology that would
fuel our future
growth and expansion and have the ability to raise the standard of living of the entire world.»
«Alternative
fuels offer the potential,
if not to lower the price [of petroleum - derived
fuels], at least to provide a hedge in the future against their future
growth or, put differently, their volatility,» says technologist Douglas Kirkpatrick, DARPA's program manager for alternative
fuels efforts.
If their hypothesis proves correct, the team will then engineer fractal
growth in bacteria that can more effectively make
fuel, optimizing its
growth patterns.
Not only are elevated concentrations toxic to wildlife and even to people, but also even moderate concentrations can,
if allowed to persist,
fuel the explosive
growth of algae.
By comparison, scenarios for fossil
fuel emissions for the 21st century range from about 600 billion tons (
if we can keep total global emissions at current levels) to over 2500 billion tons
if the world increases its reliance on combustion of coal as economic
growth and population increase dramatically.
If you are inclined, you'll learn that milk itself does nothing for our calcium absorption, and essentially nothing else other than promoting muscle
growth and heart disease (and as doctors had found in the China Study,
fuel the
growth of certain types of cancers).
Remember, these recipes are designed to
fuel you for
growth without making you explode out of your pants
if you know what I mean.
The funding disparity between charter and district students is ugly, the system is broken, and
if we are going to
fuel the next 20 years of charter school innovation and
growth, we need to fix it.
One of the amazing things about being a dividend
growth investor is that even
if you happen to not have cash on hand (or
if you do but still want to wait), you receive regular inflows of cash which can then be used to
fuel your portfolio
growth.
However,
if you do believe in Applegreen's
growth story, any reversal in
fuel margin is unlikely to mean a reduction in actual
fuel gross profit (model higher revenue numbers & you'll see that), though obviously it would affect its earnings
growth trajectory.
And
if you have a dog that is puppy of larger dog breed, you have to be more cautious about which particular food will
fuel his
growth.
If you are a travel business owner, you must be always looking out for ways that can actually
fuel the
growth of your business ensuring better revenue generation, and the importance of having perfect travel portal software
If it takes 100 plus years to double the concentration of CO2, and if the equilibrium response is a 2C increase (Pierrehumbert, «Principles of Planetary Climate», p 623), and if the increased CO2 produces increased vegetation and crop growth, then the present rate of development of non-fossil fuel power and fuel generation is more appropriate than an Apollo type project or attempt to get rid of all fossil fuel use by 2050 starting now as fast as can be don
If it takes 100 plus years to double the concentration of CO2, and
if the equilibrium response is a 2C increase (Pierrehumbert, «Principles of Planetary Climate», p 623), and if the increased CO2 produces increased vegetation and crop growth, then the present rate of development of non-fossil fuel power and fuel generation is more appropriate than an Apollo type project or attempt to get rid of all fossil fuel use by 2050 starting now as fast as can be don
if the equilibrium response is a 2C increase (Pierrehumbert, «Principles of Planetary Climate», p 623), and
if the increased CO2 produces increased vegetation and crop growth, then the present rate of development of non-fossil fuel power and fuel generation is more appropriate than an Apollo type project or attempt to get rid of all fossil fuel use by 2050 starting now as fast as can be don
if the increased CO2 produces increased vegetation and crop
growth, then the present rate of development of non-fossil
fuel power and
fuel generation is more appropriate than an Apollo type project or attempt to get rid of all fossil
fuel use by 2050 starting now as fast as can be done.
Alluding to a recent post, I asked, «Are we, in economic terms, still in a kind of pubescent
growth spurt (with fossil
fuels substituting for testosterone), and
if so, what comes with growing up?»
SA — As much as I admire your views and contributions here, I'm sure you understand solutions to any of the myriad problems facing the planet will not be solved in 5 years, particularly with «zero fossil
fuel use», which would mean no more plastic food packaging, minimal,
if any of the vital chemical compounds common to our «modern» lifestyle, and few of the medicines currently insuring our extended lifetimes and continuing population
growth.
flxible wrote: ``... «zero fossil
fuel use», which would mean no more plastic food packaging, minimal,
if any of the vital chemical compounds common to our «modern» lifestyle, and few of the medicines currently insuring our extended lifetimes and continuing population
growth...»
1) Urge to let them use highly efficient equipment available now to burn fossil
fuel even
if it suppresses their economic
growth due to their investment for replacement.
Even
if the NAAQS for CO2 did not require much of the economy — all fossil -
fuel - based power generation, manufacture, transport, and agriculture — to simply shut down, it would effectively prohibit
growth in those sectors.
Here is my attempt to present the argument for reducing the regulation of nuclear so it can become cost competitive with fossil
fuels — especially in the developing countries (which is where the emissions
growth will occur over this century
if there is not realistic alternative to fossil
fuels):
Part of the idea behind this policy is to sustainably source
fuel from forests which pose a wildfire risk
if their
growth is kept unchecked.
The inescapable
if unfashionable conclusion is that the human use of fossil
fuels has been causing the greening of the planet in three separate ways: first, by displacing firewood as a
fuel; second, by warming the climate; and third, by raising carbon dioxide levels, which raise plant
growth rates.
If there's an excess coming into atmosphere not accounted for by ocean outgassing, or known land / biosphere emissions, or fossil
fuels, or boosted northern forest
growth (and decay), or permafrost melt, then it's necessary to look for it.
If fossil fuel consumption is to blame, and if it continues to track the exponential growth rate of the past century, it stands to reason that the temperature increase over the next century will be considerably more than over the previous on
If fossil
fuel consumption is to blame, and
if it continues to track the exponential growth rate of the past century, it stands to reason that the temperature increase over the next century will be considerably more than over the previous on
if it continues to track the exponential
growth rate of the past century, it stands to reason that the temperature increase over the next century will be considerably more than over the previous one.
Exponential atmospheric CO2
growth rate will most likely not increase beyond the recent ~ 0.5 % per year, when population
growth rate is expected to decrease to less than one - third of the recent past rate, even
if per capita use of fossil
fuels increases by 50 % by 2100.
These assume a continuation of the past exponential
growth rate of atmospheric CO2 of around 0.5 % per year despite a dramatic decrease of the population
growth rate to less than one - third of the past rate so, even
if the world per capita fossil -
fuel based energy use increases by 50 %, these are most likely «upper limits» themselves.
However, even
if per capita fossil
fuel based energy were to increase by 50 % by 2100, the overall CO2 concentration would still not grow at a higher rate than 0.5 % we now see, due to the slowdown in population
growth rate.
I think that
if you read a little bit more closely — and behaved less objectionably — you would find that the point is that the world at COP21 chose development and economic
growth regardless of the
fuel.
Unsustainable pressures on the environment and on natural resources are inevitable
if energy demand remains closely coupled with economic
growth and
if fossil
fuel demand is not reduced.
Yet even
if the high price of energy from fossil
fuels and power plants combines with regional climate initiatives to slow the current rate of
growth somewhat, we will probably hit 11 gigatonnes of carbon emissions per year by 2020.
This will leave room for exceptions that meet particularly acute energy access challenges for which countries request financing for fossil
fuel generation projects, particularly
if these countries are very low emitters with low projected
growth in energy demand.
This is the stark conclusion drawn by Anderson and Bows: «The logic of such studies suggests (extremely) dangerous climate change can only be avoided
if economic
growth is exchanged, at least temporarily, for a period of planned austerity within Annex 1 nations and a rapid transition away from fossil -
fuelled development within non-Annex 1 nations.»
PA, how are you going to get billions of people out of poverty in this century,
if they are going to rely primarily on fossil
fuels for economic
growth, and not dramatically increase CO2 emissions?
If that path (with 2 % / year
growth) continues for 20 years and is then followed by 3 % / year emission reduction from 2033 to 2150, we find that fossil
fuel emissions in 2150 would total 1022 GtC.
If enacted, backers say the bills would drive
growth for renewables, battery storage and demand management, as well as help the state reduce the need for fossil
fuel peaker plants.
For instance, by 2080,
if we assume continuing
growth rates in consumption of fossil
fuels, the numbers of additional people exposed to frequent flooding in the river delta areas of the world would be counted in hundreds of millions assuming no adaptation measures were implemented.»