The logical error associated with using this statement to defend new fossil
fuel infrastructure like fracking wells and bitumen sands pipelines (as well as new fossil fuel vehicles or power plants) is so obvious that it may seem unnecessary to state, but the quip is so popular among those trying to delay adequate action on climate change that it requires a quick rebuttal.
What will need to be replaced in the next 30 years are aging fossil
fuel infrastructures like outdated coal - fired power plants.
Not exact matches
If exchanges
like Poloniex have helped build the
infrastructure for today's cryptocurrency mania, their relative secrecy and lack of accountability to customers and regulators have helped
fuel the backlash to that mania, especially outside the U.S.
Instead, it's focused on blocking new
infrastructure —
like the Fraser Surrey terminal — while gradually reducing the economy's overall dependence on fossil
fuels.
• Creating cleaner transportation options — by investing in public transit
infrastructure, improving our
fuel efficiency and transitioning to low - carbon options
like electric vehicles;
«For years, through a campaign of scare tactics and misinformation, the oil and gas industry has made expanding fossil
fuel infrastructure seem
like the only choice,» he said.
He's in favor of opting out of the Common Core state learning standards, banning hydrofracking and converting the state's fossil
fuel infrastructure to «green» sources of energy
like solar.
Conventional production consumes a lot of energy, the
infrastructure is still dwarfed by that for petroleum, and engines would need to be modified to run on pure ammonia (
like Belgium's buses, most experimental vehicles need some conventional
fuel mixed in with the ammonia).
The issue for
fuels like ours will not be existing
infrastructure.
To resolve these challenges, the Lancet - Rockefeller commission offered several proposals, including diversifying diets, making hospitals and health
infrastructure more resilient to environmental shocks
like storms, and diverting fossil
fuel subsidies toward health care.
Like the recent Fort McMurray fire, these blazes appear to be burning near fossil
fuel infrastructure and development zones.
Nuclear
fuel is 20,000 times more energy dense than fossil
fuels (up to 2 million times more energy dense when we start using the Gen IV breeder reactors
like the IFR); so it requires 1/20, 000 (to a 2 millionth) the amount of ports, shipping, railway and gas pipeline
infrastructure.
Unfortunately their efforts are undermined by rogue agencies
like the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission which is failing to do its job and evaluate the environmental and climate impacts of the massive fossil
fuel infrastructure projects it approves.
For instance, a market - based policy
like a price on carbon might encourage consumers to buy more
fuel - efficient cars, but it will fall well short of revolutionizing global energy
infrastructure and technologies.
Fossil
fuel power plants
like oil, coal, and gas not only pollute but must have a constant delivery of
fuel, which can be a challenge where transportation and pipeline
infrastructure is underdeveloped.
Development of extreme energy projects
like the Alberta Tar Sands, Bakken Shale Oil and coal from the Powder River Basin, has
fueled an explosion in proposed fossil
fuel infrastructure in the Northwest.
Instead, world leaders have pandered and caved to the powerful fossil
fuel lobby: rubber stamping massive carbon - intensive
infrastructure, unlocking billions of tonnes of new carbon in hard - to - reach places
like the deep offshore ocean, the arctic, or hard - to - extract resources
like tar sands, and proceeded to design energy policy around scenarios incompatible with a safe global climate.
Instead, world leaders have pandered and caved to the powerful fossil
fuel lobby: rubber stamping massive carbon - intensive
infrastructure, unlocking billions of tonnes of new carbon in hard - to - reach places
like the deep offshore ocean,
This growing international movement represents the next wave of institutions and individuals refusing to do business with banks financing risky fossil
fuel infrastructure projects
like the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL), Keystone XL, Trans Mountain and others.
The cities are arguing that oil companies promoted the use of fossil
fuels while denying or downplaying their harmful effects, and so should help cities pay for
infrastructure like coastal barriers to protect them.
Like Doc, I would be interested in seeing what can be done with putting domestic energy sources into tranprtation
fuels that fit easily into our current
infrastructure.
We want a climate strategy that will work for people and the planet — that means subsidies to the fossil
fuel industry and new
infrastructure projects
like pipelines have no place in Canada.
Also, renewable energy
infrastructure like bloated wind turbines can't exist without fossil
fuels and «100 % renewable energy» claims are recklessly optimistic.
The annual $ 7 billion figure does not include industry freebies
like publicly funded
infrastructure for fossil
fuel development on our shared land, inadequate financial protections to pay for coal mining cleanup, or decommissioning costs for offshore drilling.
That might sound
like an exaggeration, but since we can't substitute fossil
fuel use nearly that quickly, it'd basically involve shutting down our existing
infrastructure and moving to a non-powered economy without time to prepare and react.
To follow the lead of cities
like Portland that have barred any new fossil
fuel infrastructure, and countries
like China that have banned new coal mines.
One thing is certain about the coming electrification of transport: Our charging /
fueling infrastructure will look nothing
like the gas stations we all use today.
From the explosion of AI with frameworks
like TensorFlow, MXNet, and PyTorch to blockchain projects
like Hyperledger, Bitcoin, and Ethereum, as well as
infrastructure disruptors
like Kubernetes, Prometheus, and Istio — open source is the value that
fuels new industries and pushes forward long standing ones.