Rather than continuing to invest in fossil
fuel infrastructure when their climate goals require them to wean off of fossil fuel reliance, the leaders say they will push toward strengthening a clean energy economy in their jurisdictions.
Not exact matches
And if that's the case it makes little economic or ecological sense to spend billions of dollars building new fossil
fuel infrastructure and increasing capacity, particularly
when that
infrastructure has a working life span and expected financial return that well exceeds thirty years.
There is an overlying awareness
when assessing New York's environmentally progressive work - in - progress that the effects climate change and fossil
fuel energy industries have on the environment,
infrastructure and public health don't stop at state lines.
The trick now for activists is to stop new fossil -
fuel infrastructure, even
when it is hard for a government to do so.
First, we could count on a backup
infrastructure of dispatchable fossil
fuel power plants to supply electricity
when there's not enough renewable energy available.
When countries are developing, they are building
infrastructure which means lots of construction and fossil
fuel use.
Nuclear
fuel is 20,000 times more energy dense than fossil
fuels (up to 2 million times more energy dense
when we start using the Gen IV breeder reactors like the IFR); so it requires 1/20, 000 (to a 2 millionth) the amount of ports, shipping, railway and gas pipeline
infrastructure.
At a time
when the federal government is jeopardizing our country's future, Governor Cuomo's legislation to prohibit offshore drilling and the expansion of fossil
fuel infrastructure in New York waters is exactly the kind of policy that will get us on a truly sustainable path.
Depending on their level of resilience, low - tech networks can remain in operation
when the supply of fossil
fuels is interrupted,
when the electricity
infrastructure deteriorates,
when the economy grinds to a halt, or if other calamities should hit.
When developing low ‐ carbon transport systems, behavioural change and
infrastructure investments are often as important as developing more efficient vehicle technologies and using lower ‐ carbon
fuels.
Oil and gas pipelines are a typical analogy for the scale and nature of
infrastructure required, but have significant differences: the science of fossil
fuel reserves was limited
when much of the industry was created, and under business - as - usual the price of oil can be expected to rise as reserves go down, thus stretching out the time in which the investment is worthwhile.
We understood that folly of building 50 - year fossil
fuel infrastructure at a time
when we should urgently be transitioning to conservation and renewable energy.
PFIs must cease by 2020 direct, indirect, ancillary
infrastructure and policy support for upstream and downstream fossil
fuels, GHG - intensive projects, nuclear, large bioenergy and hydropower
when more cost - effective and less damaging alternatives exist; All PFI investments must meet strict environmental and social development criteria and be assessed through a pro-poor, inclusive, climate - resilient and gender - responsive lens;