Holdren does hardly more than repeat the Schneider - Gelbspan unsupportable talking point about fair media balance for skeptics, and Gelbspan's overall unsupportable accusation about fossil
fuel money corrupting skeptics.
Not exact matches
They don't fix New York's notoriously weak campaign - finance laws, reduce contribution limits or close loopholes that leave the capital awash in
money, the
fuel for its
corrupt pay - to - play culture.
Accusations of
corrupt fossil
fuel industry influence over skeptic climate scientists are irrelevant material — worthless — in the absence of any physical evidence (full context document scans, undercover video / audio transcripts, leaked emails,
money - transfer receipts) proving such skeptics were paid and orchestrated to lie about the certainty of catastrophic man - caused global warming.
Forget the #ExxonKnew effort to re-invigorate the otherwise 25 year - old accusation that skeptic climate scientists are paid
corrupting money by fossil
fuel companies to lie to the public about the certainty of catastrophic man - caused global warming.
Both groups are broadly inclined away from conspiracy theories, with the exception being the only positive assent to the conspiracy theory that — «The claim that the climate is changing due to emissions from fossil
fuels is a hoax perpetrated by
corrupt scientists who wish to spend more taxpayer
money on climate research».
``... The point was not that
money from the fossil
fuel industry had
corrupted the findings of the scientists...