Sentences with phrase «fuel savings per»

These technologies will save drivers money at the pump, including an estimated $ 30,000 in fuel savings per year for average tractor - trailer owners.

Not exact matches

The federal emissions standard is estimated to reduce carbon pollution equivalent to 134 coal power plants burning annually and save drivers $ 1,650 per vehicle through fuel savings according to the coalition that includes Connecticut, Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Washington.

The company claims its service conserves one gallon of fuel per idling hour per truck, and with more than one million truckers on the road at any given time, the savings add up — so far, says Wilson, eight million gallons of fuel have been saved, 83,000 metric tons of emissions have been eliminated, and 150,000 road cowboys have plugged in.

Greene predicts that the expense of meeting the new CAFE standards proposed in the Senate bill would probably range between $ 1,000 and $ 3,000 per vehicle, an up - front cost that could be recouped in fuel savings within five years if the price of gasoline remains above $ 3 a gallon.

The hybrid does include some equipment that's optional on other 3 - series, but even if the price of gasoline skyrockets to $ 20 per gallon, the ActiveHybrid 3 will never pay for itself in fuel savings.

This reduces the load on the engine and makes for fuel savings of around 0.15 litres per 100 kilometres according to the NEDC standard, and up to 0.2 litres per 100 km in city traffic with its frequent overrun and braking phases.

This leads to fuel savings of approximately 0.4 liters per 100 kilometers in the NEDC driving cycle (New European Driving Cycle) and up to 0.8 liters per 100 kilometers in city traffic compared with conventional power steering systems.

But with an average of seven miles per gallon better fuel economy, the E320 can make up that difference in fuel savings rather quickly.

Mazda says the engine and transmission changes provide a slight fuel savings over the previous powertrain: 18 miles per gallon city and 24 mpg highway, compared with 18/23 mpg for the 2001 model.

This means that despite a higher level of engine and driving performance, all four models consume significantly less fuel than the previous models; total savings for individual versions are as much as 16 per cent.

It will offer potential fuel savings of up to 0.7 liters per 100 kilometers.

The COD technology reduces NEDC fuel consumption by roughly five per cent, and even greater savings of approximately 10 per cent are possible when driving at moderate speeds.

If GM reaches its goal to sell 1.3 million light - duty fullsize pickups and SUVs, a savings of 28 million gallons of fuel at an average of 15,000 miles driven per year will result.

According to the U.S. Department of Energy, you can expect to spend just $ 950 per year on fuel with the Avalon Hybrid, which amounts to $ 2,250 in savings over five years, when compared to the average new car.

The ECO PRO mode can even lead to fuel savings of 20 per cent.

Using EPA city estimates for fuel consumption and driving 15,000 miles per year, the Hybrid will save 265 gallons of fuel, translating into $ 663 annual fuel savings.

The Consumer Federation of America advises that investing a few bucks in an alignment could improve fuel efficiency by 10 %, which translates to a savings of roughly 39 cents per gallon.

If you choose fuel rewards, you'll get 10 cents off per gallon for every $ 100 spent on BP fuel.1 That's up to $ 600 a year in possible savings!

2 $ 600 savings per year assumes a Driver Rewards member earns and redeems cents per gallon rewards on BP fuel purchases every 2 - 4 weeks per year, at an average of 20 gallons or less at participating locations.

At an average price of $ 2.50 a gallon for regular fuel, your 5 cents - per - gallon discount only amounts to a savings rate of 2 %, and if your car uses the pricier premium gas — averaging over $ 3 a gallon — that rate drops to 1.6 %.

How credit cards take a bite out of gas prices — Bonus points, cash back or cents off per gallon of gasoline add up... (See Credit cards and fuel savings)

The neo brings significant environmental and operational benefits — up to 15 per cent savings in fuel burn and CO2 emissions, and a reduced noise footprint of 50 per cent on take - off and landing phase.

The fuel program allows you to receive savings of up to $ 1 off per gallon on fuel purchases at Kroger and at participating Shell Stations.

In particular, the Shell Drive for Five card provides a 5 cents - per - gallon discount on Shell fuel purchases, with no minimum purchase requirements or maximum savings cap, which works out to around 2 % savings, depending on gas prices.

At an average price of $ 2.50 a gallon for regular fuel, your 5 cents - per - gallon discount only amounts to a savings rate of 2 %, and if your car uses the pricier premium gas — averaging over $ 3 a gallon — that rate drops to 1.6 %.

-- Fuel Rewards savings limited to 20 gallons of fuel per purchFuel Rewards savings limited to 20 gallons of fuel per purchfuel per purchase.

2 $ 600 savings per year assumes a Driver Rewards member earns and redeems cents per gallon rewards on BP fuel purchases every 2 - 4 weeks per year, at an average of 20 gallons or less at participating locations.

If you choose fuel rewards, you'll get 10 cents off per gallon for every $ 100 spent on BP fuel.1 That's up to $ 600 a year in possible savings!

The V8070 models are said to have a 100 - mile range per charge, with a rating of about 50mpg (e), which could result in an estimated 70 % fuel cost savings when compared to a conventional vehicle.

EV owners can save money on fueling costs without changing electricity plans, but taking advantage of rate plans that offer lower - cost electricity at night («time - of - use» plans) can mean hundreds of dollars in additional savings per year, especially in California.

According to NREL calculations, Helman noted, if a future gas price of $ 4.50 per MMBTU is assumed, a relative fuel savings benefit of CSP with TES over PV is about 0.5 cents per kilowatt - hour.

The study, entitled «State of Charge: Electric Vehicles» Global Warming Emissions and Fuel Cost Savings Across the United States,» points out that charging an electric vehicle with coal - based electricity yields the same carbon impact as at conventional car that gets 30 miles per gallon (mpg).

Acadia Center analysis finds that natural gas and delivered fuel (fuel oil and propane) efficiency savings must increase to 1.4 % and 1.2 % per year, respectively, to help achieve the region's emissions goals.

The report finds that we can save nearly 4 trillion Euros ($ 5.7 trillion) per year by 2050 based on energy efficiency savings and reduced fuel costs, as compared to business - as - usual.

• Kyoto Protocol • EU ETS • Australian CO2 tax and ETS • Mandating and heavily subsidising ($ / TWh delivered) renewable energy • Masses of inappropriate regulations that have inhibited the development of nuclear power, made it perhaps five times more expensive now than it should be, slowed its development, slowed its roll out, caused global CO2 emissions to be 10 % to 20 % higher now than they would otherwise have been, meaning we are on a much slower trajectory to reduce emissions than we would be and, most importantly, we are locked in to fossil fuel electricity generation that causes 10 to 100 times more fatalities per TWh than would be the case if we allowed nuclear to develop (or perhaps 1000 times according to this: http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/03/deaths-per-twh-by-energy-source.html • Making building regulations that effectively prevent people from selling, refurbishing or updating their houses if they are close to sea level (the damage to property values and to property owners» life savings is enormous as many examples in Australia are already demonstrating.

A fuel economy standard of 60 miles per gallon would more than double the oil savings of the 2012 — 2016 standards adopted in April of this year, resulting in savings from the two stages together of over 5 million barrels of oil per day in 2030, according to ACEEE analysis.

And per MW of solar installed, the carbon savings and the fuel savings from a MW of utility - scale PV are 50 % larger.»

When taken together, the two phases of fuel economy standards will result in oil savings in 2030 of more than 3 million barrels per day.

Buying a vehicle meeting these new clean car standards would increase a car buyer's monthly payment compared to today's average new vehicle, but the monthly fuel savings would more than offset the additional cost (by about $ 40 per month, on average).

Although up - front costs (purchase price) are higher with an electric bus, some studies (PDF) have shown that lower «fuel» and maintenance costs account for a savings of $ 40,000 + per year, and that these zero emissions vehicles can also provide a «healthcare savings» of some $ 150,000 per bus because of reduced nitric oxide and particulate matter emissions.

This endeavor, the company says, will mitigate 3,000 tons of carbon dioxide per year, while infusing the local economy with $ 1.4 million in fuel - cost savings and creating about 50 local jobs.

The plug - in hybrid's fuel - cost savings over traditional gasoline - powered vehicles would save these 4 million consumers approximately $ 4.2 billion a year at today's average gasoline price of $ 3 per gallon when compared to 15 cents per kilowatt - hour of electricity for 14,400 miles driven annually.

The survey also found that with a cost per mile of just two pence or less, the majority (89 %) of EV owners reported significant savings compared to more traditionally - fuelled cars.

When the study results are annualized, they equate to a nearly 2500 kilometer drop in distance driven per year per driver, and an average of euro 416 in savings on fuel annually per driver.

For example, in 2010 it was predicted that cleaner air from an emissions reduction target of 30 per cent by 2020 in the European Union would deliver savings worth 80 billion euros a year due to reductions in the incidence of respiratory and cardiovascular diseases (associated with air pollution from burning fossil fuels).»

A study prepared for the European Commission reports that achieving this target would cost less than 600 EUR per car, but savings from reduced fuel consumption would be twice as high over the lifetime of the car.

They found that the retrofits added up to 19 percent in savings on fuel bills and a 10 percent savings on electricity — or, in other words, a $ 240 on average fuel savings and $ 70 electrical savings per apartment each year.