However, the spent
fuel storage pool located inside the containment causes pressurisation inside the containment due to the water boiling out in the pool.
To make the reactor self - sufficient in case of any leakage, including a break in the main circulation pump, it is possible to use additionally the water from the spent
fuel storage pool for at least 72 hrs (an extra inventory of about 800 m3).
Of all the terrible news from the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, reports about the spent
fuel storage pool for reactor # 4 may be among the most disconcerting for scientists.
Response: The Fukushima accident happened when flooding of power plant safety systems caused by the tsunami prevented operation of pumps needed to cool the nuclear fuel within the reactor and
the fuel storage pools, causing that irradiated fuel to overheat.
The source of the leaks can be any number of things, including corroded underground pipes, and leaks in the spent
fuel storage pools.
Not exact matches
Entergy will also move a set yearly number of spent
fuel rods from their dangerous
storage pools to dry cask
storage on site — a much safer solution for this radioactive material.
The real solution, according to Lochbaum and other experts, is to require spent
fuel to be moved from
pools to more permanent
storage in massive concrete and steel casks after five years of cooling down.
«The entire spent
fuel management system — on - site
storage, consolidated long - term
storage, geological disposal — is likely to be reevaluated in a new light because of the Fukushima
storage pool experience,» the report says.
One was a measure prohibiting plant owners from densely packing spent -
fuel pools, requiring them to expedite transfer of all spent
fuel that has cooled in
pools for at least five years to dry
storage casks, which are inherently safer.
The problem of spent
fuel storage Nuclear reactor operators must store spent
fuel removed from reactor cores for several years at least, in large
pools at reactor sites until the remaining heat from the uranium
fuel cools sufficiently.
In the United States, much of the
fuel units remained stored underwater in
pools but some are removed for
storage in large casks.
A report to Congress in 2006 by a National Research Council panel investigating terrorist threats to spent
fuel storage concluded that «under some conditions,» if a
pool were partially or completely drained, that «could lead to a propagating zirconium cladding fire and the release of large quantities of radioactive materials to the environment.»
It notes that a
storage facility that could hold spent
fuel for several decades while it cools could free up space in reactors»
pools, lowering the risk of overheating, loss of coolant, and fires.
This problem continues to grow because there remains no place for used nuclear
fuel rod
storage other than such
pools or massive dry casks — both located on nuclear facility grounds.
The most damaged Daiichi reactor, number 3, contains about 90 tons of
fuel, and the
storage pool above reactor 4, which the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) Gregory Jaczko reported yesterday had lost its cooling water, contains 135 tons of spent
fuel.
And the U.S. National Academy of Sciences in 2006 suggested the practice of overcrowding
pools for the
storage of spent nuclear
fuel rods — that has caused fires and explosions at Fukushima Daiichi, which stores far less used
fuel than typical U.S. plants — could prove dangerous.
Besides developing better systems for monitoring the
pools, the panel recommends that NRC take another look at the benefits of moving spent
fuel to other
storage as quickly as possible.
Many plants around the country have maxed out temporary
storage in their spent -
fuel pools, forcing them to put waste into huge, dry casks.
The nuclear spent
fuel produced during 14 years of operation at Rancho Seco was kept cool in a water
pool on site and is now in protective dry
storage.
After removal from the reactor core, spent
fuel assemblies are placed in dedicated spent
fuel storage racks in the below ground spent
fuel pool, which contains four times more water volume for cooling per
fuel assembly than current designs.
The NuScale spent
fuel pool provides
storage for up to 10 years of spent
fuel storage, plus temporary
storage for new
fuel assemblies.
Nuclear plant
fuel managers; dry
fuel storage project managers; used
fuel cask designers; utility licensing and compliance personnel; used
fuel storage, transportation, decommissioning and disposal consultants; NDE vendors; architect engineers;
pool - to - pad services companies; hardware suppliers; government agency managers, technical experts, contractors, stakeholders and international experts responsible for used nuclear
fuel management and decommissioning issues.
A recent NRC report purports to show that the risks of continued spent
fuel storage in
pools is very low, but does not, for example, include the possibility of a terrorist attack on the
pool.
Japan's Self - Defense Forces worked to cool a
fuel rod
storage pool at Reactor No. 3 at the Fukushima Daiichi plant on Friday.
The current nuclear waste that we have sitting at the bottom of spent
fuel pools and in dry cask
storage would be more than enough to
fuel the first reactors.
Annually, Entergy will be responsible for moving a set number of spent
fuel rods from its dangerous
storage pools to dry cask
storage on site - a much safer technology for storing radioactive material.
Another consideration, as Rita Sipe, manager of Duke Energy's Nuclear Fleet Communications, in February told POWER, is that used
fuel pools and dry cask
storage sites, which Duke has located at five of the company's six operating nuclear plants, require operations and maintenance (see sidebar, «The Dry Cask Boom»).
Almost immediately, the site's personnel became alarmed over the
storage pools and shifted the remaining cooling capacity to prevent the overheating of spent
fuel at reactor No. 2.