Sentences with phrase «fuel subsidy without»

Presidency considers palliatives The Federal Government may go ahead with the withdrawal of fuel subsidy without the National Assembly's approval, The Nation learnt at the...

[People often leap to defend fossil fuel subsidies without checking whether their particular concern is addressed in policy solutions.

Not exact matches

In some regions, solar panels and wind turbines are already competitive with fossil fuels without subsidies.

Efforts to drastically slash automobile emissions and fuel use within 40 years don't stand a chance without subsidies, technology improvements and more stringent government standards, according to a report by a panel of experts released Monday.

Calling fossil fuels an antiquated technology, like whale oil, Mann points out that alternative energy is growing even without subsidies or a price on carbon.

Besides I want to the CO2 level to be at least 500 PPM and believe subsidies should be used if necessary to ensure sufficient fossil fuel is burned Without more CO2 my muskmelons won't grow as big as I want.

It isn't possible without massive fossil fuel subsidies and deliberately scorching much of the planet to reach harmful levels of CO2.

7/21/17 — In the next decade or so, electric vehicles (EVs) will become cheaper than conventional fossil - fueled cars and will outsell them even without government subsidies, says a New York Times editorial.

Certainly once it has obtained a critical mass, renewables should not need any help but expecting renewables to expand without assistance while fossil fuels receive huge subsidies is ridiculous.

The idea that fossil fuels benefit from both direct and indirect subsidies has been around for years, but analysis has generally been done in pieces (some of it done very well — Nancy Pfund and Ben Healy at DBL Investors published an excellent analysis of direct subsidies in the U.S. a couple years back) or without complete data robust enough to stand up to critique.

They might very well become cost - competitive with fossil fuels without subsidies (and they already are in some locations.)

Renewable technologies are already economically competitive with fossil fuels in a number of countries without subsidies.

Without out the subsidies and mandates and tarifs, corn fuel ethanol production would vanish.

«Before maybe the end of this decade, I see wind and solar being cost - competitive without subsidy with new fossil fuel.»

Meanwhile, natural gas, at 20 % of global fossil fuel reserves, offers the largest - scale, economic - without - subsidies substitute for either coal or oil.

He said, «In areas of strong wind and plentiful land, such as west Texas or Colorado, wind power could be cheaper than fossil - fuel generation even without subsidies.»

If these subsidies result in a change in the fuel mix, without resulting in more transport movements, they may actually decrease emissions of GHGs.

For decades the climate alarm movement has been pushing «solutions» that would handicap fossil fuels rather than make alternative energy more competitive — that is, cheaper without costly subsidies.

This is a triple - win: water use drops without affecting yields, fossil fuel use declines, and the government saves up to $ 6 billion per year in diesel and electricity subsidies.

Now, go and tell the world; not to waste good land and plenty water + diesel for grains / sugar for bio-fuel, because is plenty of it already, new every day arriving for free, in the sewage treatment plants, Get the Sods to produce fuel, without subsidy and repossessing fertile land!

The failure of «cheap energy» is splitting Americans into two rival camps: one that is enthusiastic about needless subsidy of oil and gas and another that sees without fossil subsidies renewable sources and more fuel - efficient cars and trucks come out ahead in the Market.

U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu recently claimed that wind and solar may compete with fossil fuels, without subsidies, within the next decade.

These proposals include coercion (the «Clean Power Plan») and increased taxpayer subsidies, which are required because the «renewables» Hillary favors are more expensive and less reliable than fossil fuel - generated electricity and would not be built without the coercion and subsidies.

Does it mean it can produce fuel that is cost competitive with other fuels without subsidies?

• Size of the current and historical R&D budget, both public and private, is not the only criterion — huge amounts have been spent on solar panel (photovoltaic, or PV) R&D over the decades, and PVs still are not able to compete with fossil fuels or nuclear power without huge subsidies.

Can alternative energy can be produced and distributed cheaply enough to compete even with fossil - fuel subsidies and without a carbon price?

Since reducing GHGs, if done smartly, also saves money without reducing productivity, then there's really no excuse not to vigoroously pursue such strategies — rather than continue subsidies to fossil fuels (which we pay for April 15th, if not at the pump or on our utility bills, or at least we pan costs & eco-harms off to future generations).

And we could even do it without the burden of increased costs — if only we could eliminate fossil fuel subsidies and direct them towards renewables.

Congress should first reform its suite of deployment subsidies to «better drive and reward innovation» so that clean tech segments can become cost - competitive with fossil fuels without subsidy «as soon as possible,» Jenkins said.