Sentences with phrase «fuel usage does»

Not exact matches

The Engine and Maintenance sections gives you a detailed look into engine faults, engine measurements and diagnostics, fuel usage, as well as setting up maintenance reminders and recording maintenance done.

«You can reduce your fuel usage, make fewer trips to the field, do no - till farming, improve water quality and improve yield.»

Ladies and Gentlemen, we have received information that these contaminated fuels which were originally meant for industrial usage by the steel, garment, petrol chemical as claimed by BOST by companies to run their machinery and certainly not for the running of vehicle engines has ended up in the open market against the NPA's directive not to do so.

But let's transform this into an evolutionary question: the fact that humans have a hybrid digestive system and hybrid metabolic engine does not necessarily mean that our fuel intake and usage needs to match the ratios present in the environment, particularly when, even in a lean person, fat storage dwarfs carbohydrate storage by an order of magnitude.

Sprinting also trains the body to use fat as fuel, delaying glycogen usage and increasing the amount of work your body is able to do.

It's not that it can't be done, or that it's incredibly difficult — it's just easier to eat the carbs, particularly when your aerobic engine (and your rate of fuel usage) can afford it.

It showcases a genuine fascination with the mind / body split engendered by Skyping, online dating, and constant app usage through a plot that doesn't fuel itself on received wisdom.

There are other technologies — cylinder deactivation, lean - burn engines, high - gear - count transmissions, clean diesels and more — that decrease fuel usage, or don't.

The cap and dividend does not in the review provided emphasize moving companies via economic forcing toward less fossil fuel usage in a positive fashion.

Do you care, in any way shape of form, about the massive subsidies for fossil fuel usage due to externalities not within the contracted prices?

Personally I don't have a problem with the idea of natural resources being owned in common, but I hardly think this is going to change fossil fuel usage.

Because the earth (mother earth, or Gaia, to all you tree hugger freaks) knows what we want, and what is best for us, and what is best is our nice Goldilocks climate that supports the inviolate and constitutionally protected right to cheap, atmosphere changing fossil fuels even though said usage essentially reverses 10s of millions of years of earth lower atmosphere affecting energy balances within a mere speck of time) and not you eco fools who want to harm the poor (something climate change would never do, bill gates and the world's leading scientists and thinkers and economists are fools to even think it — climate change will affect the wealthy) just to give the even more power over our individual lives.

So, why do so many people believe that humans are causing an increase in cyclone activity, and that our fossil fuel usage is somehow to blame for these natural disasters?

We have an immediate problem to solve for the welfare and health of not only our country, but the world: How do we minimize the usage of fossil fuels for automobiles!

How do I know that I'm decreasing fossil fuel usage and encouraging the creation of wind farms?

How do i know that i'm decreasing fossil fuel usage and encouraging the creation of wind farms?

Recognizing that even in a world where energy is constrained / more expensive there will always be a certain volume of goods traded globally, due to they being only able to be produced in certain locations by virtue of geographical and climatic conditions, as well as comparative advantage still standing, greater localization and regionalization of production and trade would reduce fuel usage — provided that shipment of those goods was done via train or inland waterway, not trucks.