Not exact matches
Behind the scenes, local letter writer Mitchell Langbert, a Brooklyn College professor and former Republican committee member who tried starting a Catskills chapter of the Tea Party last year, has been stirring the pot... by passing on information he's been
researching and by
fueling his local blog on a regular basis.
But there's some big money
behind green
fuel so far: UOP, a division of energy company Honeywell, is one company
researching the new
fuel.
That
research suggests fossil
fuels are
behind at least 28 % of that increase — so, she adds, more work is needed to reduce uncertainties and reconcile the ethane - based and isotope - based conclusions.
The cost benefits and climate advantages are among the reasons that five countries run national
research programs on the technique; is the United States falling
behind on the next big fossil
fuel technology?
I think that, particularly with presidential leadership, there could be more than 60 Democrats and Republicans in the Senate who could get
behind the case for
fueling an American energy quest this way, or with a directed 2 - cent - per - gallon nudge to the gasoline tax, which alone would triple our
research budget compared to the pre-stimulus level.
Publicly, most automakers are ducking the issue and emphasizing potential pitfalls of building hybrid cars with plugs, but pressure is mounting
behind the scenes to give the idea some life... «Such development should have the highest
research and development priority because it promises to revolutionize transportation economics and to have a dramatic effect on the problems caused by oil dependence,» write George Shultz, former U.S. secretary of state, and James Woolsey, former director of the Central Intelligence Agency, in a June position paper on oil and U.S. national security... They argue that battery development for plug - in hybrids «should for the time being replace the current
research and development emphasis on automotive hydrogen
fuel cells.»
The
research methodology manages to systematically ignore the most critical evidence surrounding the drivers undermining U.S. primacy: such as, the biophysical processes of climate, energy and food disruption
behind the Arab Spring; the confluence of military violence, fossil
fuel interests and geopolitical alliances
behind the rise of ISIS; or the fundamental grievances that have driven a breakdown in trust with governments since the 2008 financial collapse and the ensuing ongoing period of neoliberal economic failure.
Published last week in the journal Science, researchers from New Zealand's National Institute of Water and Atmospheric
Research (NIWA) found that the majority of methane released into the atmosphere since 2006 was produced by bacteria, pointing to sources like agriculture — rather than sources like fossil
fuel production or the burning of organic material — as the culprit
behind the increase in methane levels.
I think the Shindell paper (april issue Nature Geosciences) and the attempts to respin it by the fossil
fuel lobby together demonstrate how media opinion is far
behind the most recent scientific
research into climate.
Recent
research confirms that the above - average sea temperatures causing this bleaching across 38 countries are the result of human - induced global climate change, rather than from local pollution as was previously argued and the fossil -
fuel industry is the main culprit
behind these impacts.
Some fear that the firm may have offered the Trump campaign undue sway in the election,
fueled by claims by Cambridge Analytica whistleblower Christopher Wylie that it developed Trump's iconic, divisive, slogans long before he was even a declared candidate, and CEO Alexander Nix's boasts that Cambridge Analytica did «all the
research, all the data, all the analytics, all the targeting,»
behind Trump's successful campaign.