Sentences with phrase «fuels do to our health»

Only then can you ask the question: If most people get thier health and well - being as a result of burning fossil fuels what will restricting those fuels do to the health and well - being of people?

Renewables, meanwhile, do receive support in the form of direct subsidies, but — in advanced economies alone — can these really be compared to the costly harm fossil fuels do to our health and the planet — now put into figures in the IMF report — plus the cost of importing fuels in the first place?

Not exact matches

The price we pay for fossil fuels does not include the long - term costs to the environment and to human health.

The much - anticipated judgment by Capitol Hill's official scorekeeper did not back up the president's promise of providing health care for everyone and was likely to fuel moderate Republicans» concerns.

Nuclear fuel processing, the work that would have been done at the proposed Jiangmen project, poses little risk to public health, according to industry experts and the industry lobby group, the World Nuclear Association.

«The works also highlights how damaging brain injury can be — and fuels the public health debate about what we can do to protect ourselves against head injuries.»

Health improvement (allowing to post - pone / escape the diseases and thus live, healthier / disease - free longer, but not above human MLSP of around 122 years; thus these therapies do not affect epigenetic aging whatsoever, they are degenerative aging problems not regular healthy aging problem (except OncoSENS - only when you Already Have Cancer - which cancer increases epigenetic aging, but cancer removal thus does not change anything / makes no difference about what happens in the other cells / about what happens in the normal epigenetic «aging» course in Normal non-cancerous healthy cells) Although there is not such thing as «healthy aging» all aging in «unhealthy» (as seen from elders who are «healthy enough» who show much damage), it's just «tolerable / liveable» enough (in terms of damage accumulating) that it does not affect their quality of life (enough yet), that is «healthy aging»: ApoptoSENS - Clearing Senescent Cells (this will have great impact to reduce diseases, the largest one, since it's all inflammation fueled by the inflammation secretory phenotype (SASP) of these senescent cells) AmyloSENS - Dissolving the Plaques (this will allow humans to evade Alzheimer's, Parkinsons and general brain degenerescence, allowing quite a boost; making people much more easily reach the big 100 - since the brain is causal to how long we live; keeping brain amyloid - free and keeping our memories / neuron sharp / means longer LongTerm Potentiation - means longer brain function means longer heavy brain mass (gray matter / white matter retention seen in «sharp - witted» Centenarians who show are younger brain for their age), and both are correlated to MLSP).

Diet sodas can be no more than 25 percent of the items offered, the directive says.There should be «ample choices» of water, «soy milk, rice milk and other similar dairy or non dairy milk,» says the directive, which also covers fat and sugar content in vending machine snacks.It's all part of Newsom's effort to combat obesity and improve San Franciscans» health, similar to a national effort being championed by first lady Michelle Obama.The mayor's administration points to studies linking soda to obesity, including a UCLA one released last year that found adults who drink at least one soft drink a day are 27 percent more likely to be obese than those who don't, and that soda consumption is fueling the state's $ 41 billion annual obesity problem.

Sometimes it can be difficult to know if your intake of protein is optimal, but the body always has its ways of telling you that you're not getting enough protein to fuel your muscles and maintain your overall health and well - being, and all you have to do is listen to its messages.

You can't expect to fuel your body and achieve optimal health by eating food, laced with toxic chemicals, that your body doesn't recognize.

I started referring to my concoction as «golden fuel,» because it started to really feel like the catalyst that fueled my ability to do all the other things I needed to do to get my health back (full disclosure: I loved my blend so much I ended up starting a company to share it with other people).

Check out the Body Fuel System — the ultimate natural fat loss and get insanely healthy guide, and enjoy 4 weeks of done - for - you gluten - free, dairy - free, soy - free fitness food meal planning, shopping lists and food prep set up — plus an entire crash course to what the best foods to eat are, and how to combine them to get maximum lasting health benefits!

Download your copy of the Body Fuel System, the ultimate natural fat loss and get insanely healthy guide, and enjoy 4 weeks of done - for - you meal planning, shopping lists and food prep set up — plus an entire crash course to what the best foods to eat are, and how to combine them to get maximum lasting health benefits!

● Good fats play a number of roles in our health but an important one is slowing blood sugar spikes to help us better regulate energy and mood ● Fat is a longer burning source of fuel for the body so you don't need to think about food as much when healthy fats are the primary source of fuel.

Now we equate the word «diet» with a list of do's and don'ts in order to achieve weight loss, health or an optimal, fuel - efficient, fat - burning state for our bodies.

If you have decided to decrease your carb consumption in order to lose weight or for other health reasons, don't forget to replenish your body's natural fuel by increasing your fat intake.

Not only do fats play a key role in maintaining your Yorkie's skin and coat health, but they also help to fuel his fast metabolism as well.

And yes, on most awards British Airways still passes along «fuel surcharges» which have nothing to do with fuel and are therefore better known by their technical name «Blended Use Landing Levies for Safety, Health & Information Technologies.»

The thing though with these low - sulfur fuels, the study also found, is that while they do reduce total particle emissions, the particles that do remain tend to remain in the air longer... Which is where they post a threat to human health and affect climate.

There are many things that «average citizens» can do to reduce our demand for fossil fuels — most of which will also save us money and improve our health and quality of life.

«Climate change is severely impacting the health of our planet and all of its inhabitants, and we must transition to a clean energy economy that does not rely on fossil fuels, the main driver of this global problem.»

If they do, rather than calling for the unrealistic «end of the fossil fuel era,» they'd call on the «climate aid» to be spent on «improved public health, education and economic development,» as recommended by noted economist Bjorn Lomborg.

I would define myself as favouring camp 3 and wholeheartedly support the move off fossil fuels, but I do not favour alarm - ism as in camp 4 (although can sympathise with all other camps) except views based on profit at the endangerment to humans and co species health, safety and well being.

«Just as it doesn't make sense for organisations whose purpose is to safeguard health to profit from the tobacco industry, health institutions can no longer justify investing in fossil fuel companies but need to start investing in clean energy solutions.»

By contrast, despite spending over $ 2 trillion in 5 decades, aid programs have much less to show in terms of poverty reduction — or its ancillary benefits, e.g., reductions in hunger, disease, better health care and education, and greater adaptive capacity to deal with climate change and natural disasters — than does fossil fuel - powered economic development.

No matter what assumptions we enter, it is clear that we are far better off to get nuclear at least cost — as long as it will give us better total health effects than we have now., which clearly replacement of fossil fuels with nuclear will do.

But these direct cost related factors don't even begin to count in the terrible external costs of fossil fuels ranging from ramping damages due to climate change and direct health impacts by adding toxic particles to the air and water.

Public officials responsible for decisions made by Health Canada continue to espouse the now worn phrase: «This source of energy is viewed as a viable and environmentally friendly alternative to fossil fuels,» but it is now recognized that wind power always requires back up, including fossil fuels, and lots of it, and it does nothing at all to abate climate change or CO ₂ levels.

If you don't care to believe what the fossil fuel and nuclear industries are doing to our land, air, water, human health, AND how much they're stealing in subsidies from taxpayers like me and (presumably) you every year, then you've lost the ability to think for yourself.

We can certainly agree that solar is in general * cleaner * than fossil fuels and would likely have some associated health benefits, but I don't feel it would be intellectually honest to include arguable cause / effect healthcare costs in the direct cost of energy units for the average American consumer as the statistical chance they personally will incur medical expenses directly related to their energy bill are exceedingly low.

We have an immediate problem to solve for the welfare and health of not only our country, but the world: How do we minimize the usage of fossil fuels for automobiles!

President Trump's newly - released budget does just the opposite, dishing out giveaways to the fossil fuel industry and gutting protections for our health.

the Michigan Tech scientists focussed only on deaths from air pollution linked to coal - burning power stations: they did not make a calculation about the economic costs of chronic illness linked to polluted air, nor did they estimate the health costs that might be linked to the entire coal industry, nor include the estimates of deaths that might be attributed to climate change as a consequence of prodigal fossil fuel combustion.

Importantly, the Michigan Tech scientists focussed only on deaths from air pollution linked to coal - burning power stations: they did not make a calculation about the economic costs of chronic illness linked to polluted air, nor did they estimate the health costs that might be linked to the entire coal industry, nor include the estimates of deaths that might be attributed to climate change as a consequence of prodigal fossil fuel combustion.

What I conclude: Being barbecued, drowned, or discomfited in any way as a side effect of burning fossil fuels and injecting CO2 into the atmosphere does not appear anywhere on the list of things that are likely to threaten my health, happiness, and all around well being.

The show trial was a chance for the Kochtopus, fossil fuel interests, and global warming skeptics (including Senator James Inhofe (R - OK) who announced he is releasing a denialist book) to cry foul that industry is being victimized and that global warming is not a threat, and does not pose any risks to the health and well - being of Americans, and the planet.

Natural gas has been the primary fuel of choice in recent years, but shifting to an electricity system dependent on coal and natural gas does not alleviate the myriad risks — to the environment, economy, or public health — posed by coal alone.

What it really does is streamline access to oil, gas, and coal under public lands and federally - controlled ocean waters for the fossil fuel industry — and condemns Americans to more spills, climate - polluting emissions, and health problems.

Because slowly increasing temperatures don't seem alarming, the «availability entrepreneurs» push extreme weather events and public health impacts as being caused by human - caused climate change, more of which is in store if we don't quickly act to cool the planet by reducing fossil fuel emissions.

Read Treehugger: Don't Buy A Nalgene Water Bottle Until You Read This and BPA Danger may be greater from Tin Cans than Water Bottles, Discovery Health: Fueling Baby: What to Feed Baby, and When»

The President, as he often does — and to his credit — also reframed the debate between jobs creation and protecting the environment, saying that the jobs of the 21st century will be fueled by green energy: «We've rejected the notion that we have to chose between creating jobs and a health environment.»

I can limit flood damage and improve health very simply: But I need lower cost energy (you don't want that), lower cost steel and transportation (you are working very hard to make both more expensive), more proper and safe rules and less excessive regulation (you want more regulation and more fees and more interferences from very propagandized zealots against work), lower costs for electricity, water and fuel (you seek more taxes and rules on all) no government corruption (The carbon taxes you want go ONLY to the corrupt third world dictators and NGO profit - seekers who are selling their ENRON - inspired carbon credits, none do anything for the people of each country forced into squalor and death.)

Knowing all we do about the damage wrought by burning fossil fuels — both to our immediate health and to the long - term viability of our habitat — it would seem an act of obscene, destructive decadence.

For example, in the US, each time the Clean Air Act has been amended since 1972, fossil - fuel power companies and their associated think - tanks screamed bloody murder that sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emission reductions would essentially destroy the economy (all but ignoring the obvious health and environmental benefits that did come to fruition).

While there seems very little prospect of research finding any causal link between wind turbines and sickness, many people have been primed to believe that such a link does exist — due to extensive coverage in the popular media and the work of several people who either honestly believe that such health effects exist, or find alleged health effects to be a way of discrediting sustainable energy and thus supporting the fossil fuel industry.

Not only does it help to reduce your carbon footprint and save yourself hefty public transport / fuel costs; the health benefits are endless.

Using the experience of the Fitzroy Valley communities, the Report examines the ways in which these communities have taken control of spiralling alcohol - fuelled social and health problems, including Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders, to offer governments around the nation a tried and effective model to reform the way they do business.