Even if we put aside climate change, burning fossil
fuels produces pollution.
Not exact matches
Other activities include:
producing products that may be recycled at the end of their lifespan for material reuse; reducing energy consumption in operations; or even re-engineering distribution methods as a means of reducing long - distance travel during product delivery, ultimately reducing fossil
fuel consumption (and the disease - causing air
pollution that is its byproduct).
By leaving their engines idling for long periods, drivers contribute to air
pollution, waste
fuel, and
produce noise and fumes that harm the environment and public health.
The team studied the impacts of sulphur emitted by ships using current marine
fuels, which
produce air
pollution particles that are small enough to be breathed deeply into the lungs and are considered harmful to human health.
If the mathematics of the
pollution produced by burning a gallon of fossil
fuel seems daunting, it's even worse to look the other way: what went into making that gallon.
Two - stroke engines
produce a lot of
pollution because the
fuel - air mixture in them gets contaminated with the engine's lubricating oils.
Burning fossil
fuels to
produce electricity or heat is responsible for roughly half of global warming
pollution.
They eventually linked the mysterious
pollution to a nearby natural - gas field, and their investigation has now
produced the first hard evidence that the cleanest - burning fossil
fuel might not be much better than coal when it comes to climate change.
Hydrogen is clean - burning,
producing only water vapor as waste, so
fuel - cell vehicles using hydrogen will be zero - emission, an important factor given the need to reduce air
pollution.
Burning
fuel produces about four times more climate
pollution every year than forestry and agriculture combined — a figure that is growing.
It is stupid to use irreplaceable fossil
fuels to
produce food with the by - product of carbon dioxide
pollution, when we can do the same using energy from sunlight and actually remove CO2 from the atmosphere.
The Ministry of Environmental Protection has assembled a special team to assess the risk of water
pollution and to investigate potential problems at the undisclosed number of nuclear reactors in Sichuan, where uranium
fuel is
produced.
In the United States, the burning of fossil
fuels to make electricity is the largest source of heat - trapping
pollution,
producing about two billion tons of CO2 every year.
And the
pollution may be more or equal to those
produced by the combustion of
fuel in an ICE for the time being.
Both engines use variable valve - timing technology to
produce maximum zoom with minimum
fuel consumption and tailpipe
pollution.
The Prius, the world's first mass -
produced hybrid car, is a mechanical marvel that makes little
pollution and delivers astounding
fuel mileage.
In fact, it has such stringent
pollution controls and the
fuel - burning process is so complete, the exhaust
produced can actually be cleaner than the air outside — and cleaner than some hybrid or alternative
fuel vehicles.
If you want to assume that aerosols resulting from
pollution produced by the burning of fossil
fuels were responsible for the cooling evident from 1940 through the late 70's, then you have no reason to claim ANY degree of warming due to CO2 forcing during any earlier period.
The level «
pollution produced by the burning of fossil
fuels» is not determined by the amount of FF you burn but by what sort of FF you burn and how you burn it.
311 MARodger: «The level «
pollution produced by the burning of fossil
fuels» is not determined by the amount of FF you burn but by what sort of FF you burn and how you burn it.»
I believe that it's possible, in the next 20 years, for vehicles to use half the
fuel and
produce half the
pollution that they do today.
Human alteration of environments
produces multiple effects, some advantageous to societies, such as enhanced food production, and some detrimental, like environmental
pollution with toxic chemicals, excess nutrients and carbon emissions from fossil
fuels, and the loss of wildlife and their habitats.
Backers of plug - in hybrids acknowledge that the electricity to boost their cars generally comes from fossil
fuels that create greenhouse gases, but they say that process still
produces far less
pollution than oil.
, the fossil
fuel energy
produced from public lands included 706 million barrels of oil, 3.8 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 421 million tons of coal, contributing billions of tons worth of carbon
pollution.
«Emissions from Photovoltaic Life Cycles» found that even when accounting for the metals required to build PV cells, the efficiency of the cells, and the waste
produced, PV cells still emit less global warming
pollution throughout their life cycle than the fossil
fuels needed to
produce the same amount of power.
In 2014 alone, the fossil
fuel energy
produced from public lands included 706 million barrels of oil, 3.8 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 421 million tons of coal, contributing billions of tons worth of carbon
pollution.
After six years of research, demonstration airplanes use half the
fuel,
produce 75 % less
pollution and are much quieter — noise is just one - eighth of today's levels, says NASA's Environmentally Responsible Aviation team.
Yet despite this innovation, the transportation sector — and specifically, oil — still
produces more than a third of Oregon's fossil -
fuel carbon
pollution.
These improvements are driven by consumer demand, new technologies, and strong
fuel economy and
pollution standards, which require automakers to
produce cleaner, more
fuel - efficient vehicles.
Those solid household
fuels produce health - damaging indoor
pollution that contributes to about four million premature deaths a year, most of them women and children.
Considering the risks inherent in nuclear power, the chronic political instability gripping some key oil -
producing regions, and the climate volatility and
pollution - related disease resulting from continued fossil
fuel use, Japan's current energy economy is far from secure.
The answer: idling for longer than 10 seconds consumes more
fuel and
produces more global warming
pollution than stopping and restarting, so you're better off going inside the restaurant.
The report also found wide disparities in emission rates — the amount of
pollution generated for every kilowatt of electricity
produced — reflecting differences in management strategies,
fuel mix and
pollution control technologies.
An amendment to a major military spending bill before the House would rescind a 2007 federal law barring the Defense Department from using alternative
fuels, like synthetic oil made from coal, that
produce more climate - altering
pollution than conventional
fuels.
-- Apparently all combustion engines can run on hydrogen technology using water as the
fuel and
produces little or no
pollution, as per Stanley Meyer's inventions;
He said that «as long as
producing carbon
pollution carries no cost, traditional plants that use fossil
fuels will be more cost - effective than plants that use nuclear
fuel.»
The Department of Health must
produce by Dec. 2018 a cumulative impact analysis to designate communities highly impacted by fossil
fuel pollution and climate change in Washington.
«Every person who is born uses more food, more water, more land, more fossil
fuels, more trees and
produces more rubbish, more
pollution, more greenhouse gases, and adds to the problem of over-population.»
The NAS National Research Council calculates that the health costs from fossil
fuel combustion are in the billions: «WASHINGTON — A new report from the National Research Council examines and, when possible, estimates «hidden» costs of energy production and use — such as the damage air
pollution imposes on human health — that are not reflected in market prices of coal, oil, other energy sources, or the electricity and gasoline
produced from them.
Most of the world's deadliest
pollution is concentrated in the Third World, largely among poor households which have little or no access to electricity
produced by fossil -
fuel power.
Fossil
fuels produce enormous amounts of
pollution, and as long as we burn them, as long as we use the atmosphere as a sewer, the costs of
pollution should be paid by the polluter.
have played prominent roles in the decades - long work of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC, which has
produced the overarching scientific consensus on the risks of climate change due to human
pollution, mostly from burning fossil
fuels.
The problem was historically not realizing the ecological impact of
producing and burning fossil
fuels (both in terms of global warming as well as other forms of
pollution) until it was a problem of catastrophic proportions.
And over the decades, we've seen firsthand the dangers of relying on oil as a
fuel source — the price gouging, the geopolitical struggles it
produces, the
pollution it creates.
Not so: those fossil
fuel industries
produce plenty of
pollution that adversely impacts the public at large — and pay zilch for it.
«It is... going to generate
pollution, not just from fossil
fuels but also from lithium plants, which
produce sulphur dioxide,» Luis Alberto Echazu, Bolivian minister for mining, told BBC News.
The plan would charge drivers $ 8 to enter Manhattan on weekdays from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m., which would help us reduce the congestion that is choking our economy, the
pollution that has helped
produce asthma rates that are twice the national average, and the carbon dioxide that is
fueling global warming.
In the United States, the burning of fossil
fuels to make electricity is the largest source of heat - trapping
pollution,
producing about two billion tons of CO2 every year.
In passing the Act, Congress intended to replace 30 percent of petroleum vehicle
fuel use with alternative
fuels by 2010, through federal purchase of less polluting vehicles, and by harnessing the purchasing power of the federal government to spur the market for natural gas, propane, ethanol and electric vehicles, which
produce less
pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.
Another thing is that, global production of goods mostly happens in those «cheap» countries, so they can hardly be criticised for having
fuel pollution issues can they as they
produce probably 80 % of the worlds goods.