Sentences with phrase «full agency»

This is why a designated agency brokerage can represent a buyer and a seller in a single transaction with full agency representation to both parties.

Industry member # 1 is free to represent buyers in full agency, but must not disclose any confidential information learned in their previous agency relationship with the seller.

This is how a designated agency brokerage can represent a buyer and a seller in a single transaction with full agency representation to both parties, when both parties have different designated agents.

This results in more clients being able to maintain full agency benefits from the brokerage and industry members who represent them.

Each designated agent must maintain the confidentiality of their client's information, act solely in their client's best interests and provide full agency representation.

Part of Full Agency is the fiduciary element of «undivided loyalty» and as such a Real Estate Professional, REALTOR, who is representing a Full Client can't focus equally on everyone because it would be a breach of their Fiduciary Responsibility!

Ross, even if a visitor to an open house received full Agency Disclosure (the need for which you seem to disavow) they should never want to waive their entitlement to confidentiality — especially, prior to completing the tour of the open house and being fully satisfied that they are not interested in the property.

This could be true for both seller's and buyer's even if they have received Full Agency Disclosure.

Mark, in view of the fact that the section of REBA 2002 that you've quoted is largely gratuitous regarding real estate industry: Full - Agency, Client, Relationships, perhaps the point that should be made is that it is very important to make the distinction between Full Agency, Client, Relationships and No - Agency, Customer, Relationships — in terms of consumer entitlements?

Refreshingly, Wood depicts only positive, validating sexual experiences for both Sib and Lou, in which they each have full agency over their bodies and their choices with their partners.

But when Random House agreed to be bound by the Penguin settlement, it became clear that all five of the other big six publishers would be allowing the whole agent's commission to be used as discount, and Macmillan's stand - alone selling at full agency price would have no impact on the overall marketplace.

When Real Estate Practitioner, REALTOR's promote Client or «Full Agency Relationships», we know more about those whom we show through the homes of Seller's.

I think by now most professional agents have read the disclaimers and liability waivers being used by the mere posting community to attempt to bypass the formerly mandatory full agency that was required before a home was ever seen on realtor.ca.

In 2012 we introduced the term Licensed Real Estate Full Agency Practitioner as a suggested work around to the «Professional» problem because Provincial Legislation limits who can use such a term.

This discussion questioned the propriety of offering Full Agency under certain circumstances — No - Agency didn't have a place, even as a third choice.

(Note: the banks are not saying how much should be charged but instead only demand full agency representation and it's attached due diligence provisions)

When CREA agreed that as an industry we would capitulate and commence to offer a product that promoted an initial «No Agency» relationship, by default we surrendered our ability to defend and promote Full Agency in the way that we should, over No Agency as just being a contingency or a fall - back position — that wasn't even available to us without the written consent of the consumer.

This was suggested as a solution to some of the pitfalls and perceived legal, ethical and practical problems with Disclosed Limited Dual Agency, and a system in which both buyer and seller could «benefit from full agency representation».

Just a comment but a Mere Posting by definition bypasses the due diligence of full agency that is why it is called a Mere Posting.

The need for a «mere posting» Seller (s) to receive Agency Disclosure is as great, but surely even greater than those who would receive Full Agency Representation.

While we do require that you give us first right of refusal, we can not guarantee a switch from subrights management to full agency representation.

VOW's by their very nature typically ingratiate themselves to consumers by initially treating them as but «Customer's» and on a «No - Agency» basis — a much lower standard than a «Full Agency» Relationship!

Following the April 1 Business Insider report that implied Amazon was losing patience with HarperCollins in negotiating a new sales agreement, Publishers Lunch has learned that Harper is preparing to return to full agency for ebook sales next week.

Publishers Lunch reported last week that HarperCollins was preparing to return to a full agency model for e-book sales.

News & Notes is a weekly Saturday post featuring book - and publishing - related news, links to interesting articles and opinion pieces, and other cool stuff Book News More on the HarperCollins / Amazon story: HC has notified multiple retailers that «it will be returning to a full agency model for e-book sales next... Read more»

We assign a personal caseworker to you who will explain how we offer the Quickest Match Time, Full Agency and Legal Services and Flexible Options for your Adoption.

It should be a no - brainer that a Registrant / REALTOR who consistently, or at least on average, negotiates lower prices for their Buyer's and higher Prices (as a percentage of list price) for their Seller's would be a true professional whose motivations are consistent with what is required of and in a Full Agency Client Relationship.

In a Full Agency Client Relationship your duty is to your principle, whichever side they happen to be on, buyer or seller.

This creates the question of: does this cause a: detrimental delay, in the consumer being developed into a Client and given the benefit of «Full Agency» Representation and protection, as compared to what would be the case with the more traditional brokerages — who accommodate but don't promote: No Agency Relationships.

, is a shocking and fundamental misrepresentation of the role of a REALTOR inside a Full Agency Client Relationship.

Michel the (B) part is this is the question of: to what extent and frequency have or will Real Estate Consumer's potentially delay entering into a Full Agency Relationship with a Registrant or Practitioner, as a result of the level and amount of data they have access to with but a «Customer» status, as a Customer of a Full - blown VOW Brokerage?

The author, is suggesting a kind of neutrality that can't be a part of Full Agency or Designated Agency, a suggestion that isn't made logical through the use of silly statements as to the obvious rolled into inapplicable metaphors such as the following: «The agent is not the buyer or the seller of a property, they are the coach master on the transaction, riding shotgun to ensure that trouble is kept away, and that everyone reaches their destination safely.»

It was nice to see RECO pick up on this but even they had to pull back and only us Licensed Real Estate Practitioner, removing the most important part, that being full agency.

In addition, a Customer Relationship is such that the Customer shouldn't view the Registrant or Practitioner as an «authority» — before the Registrant or Practitioner has had the opportunity to utilize their discretion within the context of an Full Agency Relationship!

I think we need to remind ourselves that there are two categories of consumers that are to be considered in all this: buyers and sellers, and when we're working for a seller in a full agency relationship we have a responsibility of undivided loyalty to them.

When a seller who has had the benefit of a Full Agency Relationship is excused from their Listing Agreement or it expires, and they decide to sell privately but sign a «Mere Posting Agreement» they can basically nullify the «holdover clause» for just a token sum of money!