Sentences with phrase «full argument on»

That is because the issue did not arise directly on this appeal, and Lord Wilson hinted at [57] that there might have been less full argument on the point.

Ryder J heard full argument on an interlocutory application for separate representation and his judgment is undoubtedly the seminal consideration of the topic.

Check out their full argument on «Why You Shouldn't Go To Law School» here.

Not exact matches

Jacoby's occasion for recycling this tired truism is David Gelernter's new book, America - Lite: How Imperial Academia Dismantled Our Culture (and Ushered in the Obamacrats), which he thinks is short on arguments and full of shrill right - wing clichés about tenured radicals and rootless intellectuals.

While I would hesitate to engage in a full - out debate of theism vs. atheism on this forum for reasons that I have already stated, I would be interested in hearing your response to the traditional ontological and moral arguments in favor of the existence of God as well as the argument from contingency.

«Full and free discourse» is, in other words, a summary expression of the internal conditions of discourse noted earlier: equal freedom of all participants to advance and contest any claim and the arguments for it, and uncompromised commitment on the part all participants to seek the truth.

A full defense of this intuition as true (i.e., as «public») demands the kind of argument and modes of reflections which I have attempted in my recently completed work on systematic theology (The Analogical Imagination).

The big bang does not state that something comes from nothing, and the rest of your argument is ludicrous.This is why Bill Nye is right - a lack of scientific understanding results in a nation full of ignorance and lack of critical thinking; not good for a nation that is basically making money by being on the cutting edge of technology.

This can be obscured as one looks at a library full of volumes on Christian doctrine or looks back at the history of Christendom with its arguments and bloody wars.

When we familiarize ourselves with only one side of the debate (typically the side ultimately found to be just) we miss the full depth of the argument and, worse yet, slip into a sort of historical amnesia that allows us to believe we too would have chosen the side of good on account of its seemingly obvious virtue.

I wish I could explain his reasoning on this, but you really must read the chapters for yourself to grasp the full weight of his argument.

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

Now it is central to the whole point of David Novak's argument that this entire strategy is founded on a most fundamental error, whose formulation we must cite in full, adding italics to highlight its centrality: «Theologically, the error here is that revelation is essentially reduced to the supreme awareness of an order already present in creation.»

Robert Benne's critique of Mitri Raheb's lecture on the Israeli - Palestinian conflict («Political Supersessionism,» March) is full of claims and insinuations, but bereft of substantial arguments.

According to the epistemological argument, on the ancestral chain model one can not have full - blown epistemic acts wherein a chain of reasoning in thought through and a conclusion drawn.

I may not have achieved full clarity on the varied senses of faith that are involved, but this view of the changing nature and focus of faith is central to the argument of the book.

While this fellow has made some interesting, thought - provoking points, I believe that any argument can run amok if we lose sight of the full counsel of God on the subject.

However, Martin goes on to stress the importance of the concluding three sentences of Lumen Gentium 16 which, being fundamental to his argument, are worth quoting in full:

In my paper on Anselm, an attempt was made, not only to spell out the full vocabulary needed for stating the — or at least a — ontological argument, but also to list in full the premises needed.

This can quickly escalate into a full - on argument in which our goal is to come out on top.

While you can make arguments that the Angels are on the rise because they have Trout, or that the Giants are better than their 98 losses when you factor in a full season from their starting staff and better outfield defense, it's really just the Dodgers and Cubs in a tier by himself.

I mean this site / thread probably isn't the place (understatement) but I have delved into this argument more thn the averge joe, and I guarantee someone taking the opposing position in a debate against me on this subject is going to have their hands full with the amount of evidence I could put forth on them for the supposition that an intelligent enity at the very least kick started this thing off.

And am sick of the he needs game time after injury argument... He's been match ready for two months or more and should be willing and able to prove he is a first team contender... instead each time he appears it's the jogging around plus the ocassional darting run on display again along with the demonstrated ability not to be able to dribble with the ball the failure to give real defensive support to full back and the persistent fragility in front of goal... Should be part of a buy one get one free package with wenger

you'll find no argument from me on that score but if Wenger wants to build a team he needs to stop bringing in substandard replacements for the players going out, its like he is trying to keep the bucket full when he knows theres a hole in it.

of course no team wants to lose but I can guarantee you that the reaction by the Chelski fans after today's results are nowhere near what would have occurred if we shit the bed on opening day... the difference is they have tasted EPL success on more than one occasion recently, they have won the Champions League and they have done it with 3 different managers in the last 12 years with a similar, if not smaller, wage bill than us... in comparison, we have been experiencing our own personal Groundhog Day with nothing to show for it but a few silvery trinkets that would barely wet the appetite of a world - class club... so it's time for Wenger to stop gloating over our week one escape act and make some substantial moves before this window closes or I fear that things will take a horrible turn when the inevitable happens... living on a knife's edge is no way to go through a full season of football and regardless of what side of the argument you fall on, you could feel high levels of toxicity in the air and that was friggin week one... I would much rather someone tried their best and failed, than took half - measures and hoped for the best

I'll choose the glass - half - full for the sake of argument: Look at the development of the individuals on our roster: Couturier went from 15 minutes a night with Rinaldo before Hak --- and is now a Selke nominee.

With Alexis on the other side getting too involved in the midfield and not stretching play (and there's an argument his role should be adjusted, to try and get behind more), Arsenal only get width from their full - backs, which in turn, leaves Santi Cazorla and Francis Coquelin a lot of covering to do.

Legislators considering changing their divorce laws should consider the full range of legal options available to them, such as those compiled by Americans for Divorce Reform and posted on their Internet «Divorce Reform Page «69 This site presents arguments for and against the initiatives as well as model legislation.

The Log Cabin Republicans» reply brief Friday said that the Justices» review of that case was opposed by the other challengers based on the argument that the Court should await the development of a full factual record at a trial on the policy's constitutionality.

«But expect his argument for pre-k, and the need to pay for it with a small tax increase on the wealthy, to be full - throated.»

Arguments can be pursued, and it's unlikely that a generous mind would regard that full - on, combative dialectic would ever produce anything interesting, no extended conversations with people who are smarter than you.

That conclusion, based on a full but complicated analysis of every possible measurement ¬ — complaints to Ombudsfolk, audit reports of all kinds, measurement of times and numbers, review of agency work and outsourcing — stands up against every possible reservation, such as the argument that costs and complaints would have risen even more had the reforms not been undertaken, or that social change made it necessary for government to run faster to stand still.

It takes a braver person still to do it with a microphone in one hand and a set list full of segments on the merits of privatisation in the NHS and arguments in favour of public sector cuts.

But one of the things that sustains you in this job is the sense that yes, our politics is full of argument and debate, and it can get quite heated, but no matter how difficult the decisions are, there's a great sense of British fair play, a quiet but prevailing sense that most people wish their Prime Minister well and want them to stick at it and get on with the job.

But Labour's Baroness Smith said that given the referendum campaign had been full of arguments about reasserting Parliamentary sovereignty, it was appropriate that Parliament should have the «final say» on the process.

Opinion on whether HS2 is a good or bad idea is divided to say the very least, and I don't propose to go into the arguments here although for the sake of full disclosure, I'm on the side of the antis, but it did annoy me that many people who were protesting that it would have a devastating effect on their lives were waved away with the flick of a railway engineer's hand.

12:20 - A critical comment on Royal Mail privatisation earns a full minute of Brown argument on why it's such a wonderful idea.

«Prohibition in this whole area simply isn't working... Whilst people may find this distasteful, I think we need a proper full Royal Commission on this whole area of drugs... Let's find out through a Royal Commission whether perhaps we should decriminalise drugs, whether we should license them, license the users and sell them at Boots... I think there is an argument that says that if we decriminalised it, we'd make the lives of millions of people far better than they are today.»

Cornegy (D - Brooklyn) made a different argument, saying many people would not run for office if they didn't have a chance to claim full city pension benefits, which happens after ten years on the payroll.

Highlights include closing arguments in Sheldon Silver's corruption trial; the continuation of Dean Skelos» corruption trial; the release of the Public Advocate's «worst landlord list»; several City Council hearings and a full - body «Stated Meeting»; two public meetings of the city's commission on elected official compensation; and more.

They agree with the Soft Pedalers that hardening the glutes can prevent superflexible yogis from reaching their full potential in backbends, but they also note a weakness in their other arguments: Every one of them is based on the assumption that tightening the buttocks will pull the thighs apart and turn them out.

This is the area where we score over our essays as our school is a full - fledged argument middle providing guidance by Kris Driessen, Hickory Hill Antique Quilts http: / /: click on the button for more information on a particular topic

Sure, having unlocked a vanity weapon skin would seem like a pretty weak argument to drop cash on a full - price AAA title, but psychology proves that it works.

Martin's ultimate argument sits, with full (even at times perhaps excessive) acknowledgment, on the «shoulders» of others» copious contributions from the 1950s on.

As political arguments both on the podiums and in homes fire up in the United States ahead of the federal election, The Wall Street Journal has released the first full trailer for the upcoming independently produced and pro-Objectivism feature...

Small districts, the argument goes, still require a full - time librarian, counselor, nurse, physical - education teacher, and so on, and thus some minimum level of fixed costs is unavoidable.

Our impression is that, as far as the focus on argument writing goes, the Standards» writers would love to be like the spouse who tells his or her partner on a Monday night that it doesn't matter where they go to dinner — he or she can choose whatever restaurant for them to go — while knowing full well that the only one open is the favorite of the spouse who is supposedly being magnanimous.

Timothy did stress that although he supports lifting the ban, he did not want to see a return to a fully selective system, saying: «This isn't an argument for a full - on return to a selective system of grammars and secondary moderns.

Included in the PowerPoint: Macroeconomic Objectives (AS Level) a) Aggregate Demand (AD) and Aggregate Supply (AS) analysis - the shape and determinants of AD and AS curves; AD = C+I+G + (X-M)- the distinction between a movement along and a shift in AD and AS - the interaction of AD and AS and the determination of the level of output, prices and employment b) Inflation - the definition of inflation; degrees of inflation and the measurement of inflation; deflation and disinflation - the distinction between money values and real data - the cause of inflation (cost - push and demand - pull inflation)- the consequences of inflation c) Balance of payments - the components of the balance of payments accounts (using the IMF / OECD definition): current account; capital and financial account; balancing item - meaning of balance of payments equilibrium and disequilibrium - causes of balance of payments disequilibrium in each component of the accounts - consequences of balance of payments disequilibrium on domestic and external economy d) Exchange rates - definitions and measurement of exchange rates - nominal, real, trade - weighted exchange rates - the determination of exchange rates - floating, fixed, managed float - the factors underlying changes in exchange rates - the effects of changing exchange rates on the domestic and external economy using AD, Marshall - Lerner and J curve analysis - depreciation / appreciation - devaluation / revaluation e) The Terms of Trade - the measurement of the terms of trade - causes of the changes in the terms of trade - the impact of changes in the terms of trade f) Principles of Absolute and comparative advantage - the distinction between absolute and comparative advantage - free trade area, customs union, monetary union, full economic union - trade creation and trade diversion - the benefits of free trade, including the trading possibility curve g) Protectionism - the meaning of protectionism in the context of international trade - different methods of protection and their impact, for example, tariffs, import duties and quotas, export subsidies, embargoes, voluntary export restraints (VERs) and excessive administrative burdens («red tape»)- the arguments in favor of protectionism This PowerPoint is best used when using worksheets and activities to help reinforce the ideas talked about.

In other words, her argument rests on the real concern (and very real concern in terms of the current research) that «ceiling effects» are / were preventing her students from growing upwards, enough, when compared to other «similar» students who are also to demonstrate «a full year's worth of growth.»