Not exact matches
While much of the debate around energy is focussed on greenhouse gas
emissions, our findings highlight the need to consider the
full range of consequences of the world's demand for energy when designing energy and environmental
policies.»
The key issue here — far larger than the debate over a 17 % or an 84 % excess
emissions per [barrel] of tar sands oil vs. light sweet crude — is highlighted by, [but] not put into
full energy and climate context by, the compelling and depressing Charles Homans Foreign
Policy article [link].
The
full Presidential Climate Action Plan (as opposed to summaries) contains a comprehensive set of ideas to reduce transportation
emissions, covering not only improvements in vehicle efficiency and alternative fuels, but also changes in national
policy to promote high - speed rail for intercity travel, mass transit and telecommuting, and smart growth in urban development.
The chart above illustrates potential CO2
emission trajectories under EMF 27
full technology scenarios8 targeting a 2oC pathway (Assessed 2oC Scenarios) relative to the 2018 Outlook, and baseline pathways (Assessed Baseline Scenarios) with essentially no
policy evolution.
«In addition,
policy choices can be found, making
full use of the innovations developed to implement the Kyoto protocol, and recognising the economic realities of the energy sector, which contribute more fully to greenhouse gas
emissions mitigation.»
In fact, as a set, the RCPs should be compatible with the
full range of
emissions scenarios available in the current scientific literature, with and without climate
policy.
Hu Angang, a public
policy professor at Tsinghua University in Beijing and a prominent
policy adviser for the Chinese government, has advocated for China to aim for a peaking of carbon
emissions in 2030, while Read the
full story
For example, California's Low Carbon Fuel Standard (CA - LCFS) embeds life cycle assessment within the
policy to measure
emissions intensity of various transportation fuel pathways through their
full life cycle (including extraction, recovery, and transport).
Achieving the National Trading Case's
full range of benefits will require
policy makers and regulators across the country to work with utilities, electricity generators, advocates, regional transmission organizations, and other stakeholders to develop state compliance plans that prioritize renewable energy and energy efficiency and generate revenue through interstate carbon
emissions trading.
The difference between Professor Nordhaus's optimal carbon tax
policy and a fifty - year delay
policy is insignificant economically or climatologically in view of major uncertainties in (1) future economic growth (including reductions in carbon
emissions intensity); (2) the physical science (e.g., the climate sensitivity); (3) future positive and negative environmental impacts (e.g., the economic «damage function»); (4) the evaluation of long - term economic costs and benefits (e.g., the discount rate); and (5) the international political process (e.g., the impact of less than
full participation).
In this case, your unsupported generalization that «the electorate could not care less» about climate change was rebutted with actual opinion polls showing that significant majorities of «the electorate» do, in fact, care a good deal, and consider the issue a priority for the President and the Congress, and support
policies to regulate GHG
emissions and to hold fossil fuel corporations responsible for the
full costs of their products.
Like a
full life - cycle analysis for judging the impact on net
emissions of a switch in energy - generation technologies, a
full Earth - system analysis should become the new standard in judging climate -
policy proposals.