Sentences with phrase «full fare advertising»

This consent order concerns fare displays by Spirit Airlines, Inc. (Spirit) on its website (www.Spirit.com) that failed to comply with the Department's rule on full fare advertising, 14 CFR 399.84.

This notice is intended to provide guidance on two matters related to compliance with 14 CFR 399.84, the Department's rule on full fare advertising, and the underlying statutory proscription in 49 U.S.C. § 41712 against unfair and deceptive trade practices.

This consent order concerns advertisements on Icelandair's web site and e-mail advertisements disseminated by the carrier that failed to comply with the Department's rule on full fare advertising, 14 CFR 399.84.

This consent order concerns violations by AirTran Airways, Inc., (AirTran Airways) of the full fare advertising requirements specified in 14 CFR 399.84 and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

This consent order concerns fare displays on the U.S. website of China Airlines, Ltd., (http://www.china-airlines.com/en/index.htm) and certain displays of China Airlines» fares on Travelocity.com, a major travel vendor and agent of China Airlines that failed to coinply with the Department of Transportation's rule on full fare advertising, 14 CFR 399.84.

This consent order concerns fare displays by Southern Sky Air & Tours, LLC d / b / a Myrtle Beach Direct Air & Tours, (Direct Air) a U.S. Public Charter operator, on its website and in other print and Internet advertisements that failed to comply with the Department's rule on full fare advertising, 14 CFR 399.84, and therefore constituted an unfair and deceptive practice and unfair method of competition in violation of 14 CFR 380.27 and 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

This order concerns violations by AirTran Airways, Inc., (AirTran) of the full fare advertising rule, 14 CFR 399.84 (a), and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

This consent order concerns violations by Delta Air Lines, Inc., (Delta) of the full fare advertising requirements specified in 14 CFR 399.84 and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

This consent order concerns violations by Pacific Delight Tours, Inc. (Pacific Delight), of the requirements of the Department's full fare advertising rule, 14 CFR 399.84.

This notice is intended to give further guidance to air carriers and other sellers of air transportation on how those additional taxes, fees, and restrictions that are permitted to be listed separately from a fare quotation may be disclosed in advertisements.1 This guidance will be used by the Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings in its compliance and enforcement activities associated with 14 CFR 399.84, the Department's full fare advertising rule, and 49 U.S.C. 41712, which prohibits unfair and deceptive practices.

This consent order concerns advertisements published by Compania Mexicana de Aviacion S.A. de C.V. (Mexicana) that failed to comply with the Department's rule on full fare advertising, 14 CFR 399.84, and thereby violated the statutory proscription in 49 U.S.C. § 41712 against unfair and deceptive practices.

This consent order concerns violations by LAN Airlines, S.A., (LAN) a foreign air carrier, of the full fare advertising requirements specified in 14 CFR 399.84 and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

Not exact matches

This order concerns violations by Southwest Airlines Co. (Southwest) of the full - fare advertising rule, 14 CFR 399.84 (a), and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

Until Jan. 26, 2012, only government - imposed taxes and fees assessed on a per - passenger basis, such as passenger facility charges, could be stated separately from the advertised fare, but they had to be clearly disclosed in the advertisement so that passengers could easily determine the full price to be paid.

This consent order concerns Internet advertisements by Unister USA, LLC, d / b / a Flights24.com (Unister) that (1) failed to comply with the Department's full - fare advertising requirements as specified in 14 CFR Part 399, and (2) failed to disclose code - share arrangements pursuant to the requirements specified in 14 CFR Part 257 and 49 U.S.C. § 41712 (c).

This consent order concerns violations by Continental Airlines, Inc., (Continental) of the full - fare advertising requirements specified in 14 CFR 399.84 and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

This order concerns violations by Allegiant Air, LLC, (Allegiant) of (1) the requirements of 14 CFR Part 382 (Part 382) with respect to properly coding and recording its disability - related complaints in connection with required disability reporting to the Department of Transportation (Department), as well as providing dispositive written responses to written consumer complaints alleging a violation of Part 382, and related statutory provisions, 49 U.S.C. § § 41702 and 41705; (2) the Department's full - fare advertising requirements, 14 CFR 399.84; and (3) 49 U.S.C. § 41712, which prohibits carriers from engaging in unfair and deceptive practices and unfair methods of competition.

This consent order concerns advertisements by Gate 1, Ltd., (Gate 1) a ticket agent, that violated 14 CFR 399.84 the Department's rule on full - fare advertising, and 49 U.S.C. § 41712, which prohibits unfair and deceptive practices by air carriers and ticket agents.

This order concerns violations by Vision Airlines, Inc., (Vision) of the Department's full - fare advertising rule, 14 CFR 399.84, as well as 49 U.S.C. § 41712, which prohibits carriers from engaging in unfair and deceptive practices.

The Complainant alleges that British Airways violated the Department's full - fare advertising rule by quoting taxes, fees, and carrier charges that did not reflect the entire price to be paid by the consumer.

This consent order concerns air fare advertisements by Expedia, Inc. (Expedia), that failed to provide the full fare or adequate notice of additional taxes and fees with respect to certain sale fares in violation of the Department's full - price advertising requirements, 14 CFR 399.84, and therefore constituted an unfair and deceptive practice and unfair method of competition in violation of 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

The only exceptions currently allowed are government - imposed taxes and fees that are assessed on a per - passenger basis, such as passenger facility charges, which may be stated separately from the advertised fare but must be clearly disclosed in the advertisement so that passengers can easily determine the full price they must pay.

The only exception currently allowed is government - imposed taxes and fees that are assessed on a per - passenger basis, such as passenger facility charges, which may be stated separately from the advertised fare but must be clearly disclosed in the advertisement so that passengers can easily determine the full price they must pay.

Under the new full - fare advertising rule, all government taxes and fees must be included in the advertised fare.

This consent order concerns an Internet advertisement by Asiana Airlines (Asiana) that violates the full - fare advertising requirements specified in 14 CFR 399.84, as well as 49 U.S.C. § 41712, which prohibits unfair and deceptive practices.

This consent order concerns Internet advertisements by Globester, LLC (Globester), that violated the Department's full - fare advertising requirements specified in 14 CFR Part 399, the Department's code - share disclosure rule, 14 CFR Part 257, and the statutory prohibition against unfair and deceptive practices, 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

On February 6, 2013, Mr. Benjamin Edelman (the Complainant) filed a third - party complaint under 14 CFR 302.401 against British Airways PLC (British Airways), alleging that the carrier failed to properly disclose and provide adequate justification for carrier - imposed surcharges and to comply with the Department's «full fare» advertising rule on its On Business company travel website.

Aeroflot violated the rule on full - fare advertising and the rule requiring airlines to include a commitment in their customer service plans allowing consumers either to hold reservations at the quoted fare without payment, or cancel without penalty, for 24 hours after they book a flight.

By failing to advertise the entire price of the flight when fares were first stated, the airline violated the full - fare advertising rule.

This consent order concerns violations by Spirit Airlines, Inc., (Spirit) of the Department's oversales rule, 14 CFR Part 250; accounting and reporting requirements, 14 CFR Part 241; record retention requirements, 14 CFR 249.20 and 14 CFR 382.70; consumer information requirements, 14 CFR 382.45 (d) and 14 CFR 250.9; full - fare advertising rule, 14 CFR 399.84; Article 17 of the Montreal Convention; and domestic baggage liability rule, 14 CFR Part 254.

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) today fined Allegiant Air $ 100,000 for violating rules protecting air travelers with disabilities, as well as the Department's rule for full - fare advertising.

If you are paying full fare for a flight of $ 1,000 with the expectation that you will, in return, receive passage on said flight, plus a certain value of reward points, then they should have to deliver the value they advertised at the time of purchase since that value was needed to induce you to make the purchase.

As a part to the concept of full fare disclosure, the new rules prohibit «opt out» provisions in any advertising.