Sentences with phrase «full indemnity costs in»

Not exact matches

In Hicks v. Hicks, 16 E.T.R. (2d) 179, Mr. Justice Shaw awarded full indemnity for costs against the defendant, as a result of his reprehensible conduct in exercising undue influence over his elderly motheIn Hicks v. Hicks, 16 E.T.R. (2d) 179, Mr. Justice Shaw awarded full indemnity for costs against the defendant, as a result of his reprehensible conduct in exercising undue influence over his elderly mothein exercising undue influence over his elderly mother.
«In my opinion, the surreptitious and dishonest conduct of Edward was so highly reprehensible as to warrant an award of full indemnity, that is, solicitor and own client costs.
If the conflict of interest issue were characterized in this way, the insured's right to full indemnity costs ought to have flowed from the principle that an insured should not to be put to expense in securing a defence under the policy.
In additional reasons, the court concluded that full indemnity costs on the motion were not appropriate.
Having been substantially successful at trial, the claimant sought full indemnity for legal costs based upon a clause in an assignment agreement which had been entered into by the parties.
The Ontario Court of Appeal has consistently held that the insured is «entitled to a defence... at no cost to them».2 In other words, an insured is «entitled to be made financially whole» for legal costs incurred in securing a defence under the policy.3 This broad principle has not only been used to indemnify insureds for their past defence costs, but also the future defence costs of counsel of their choice, the costs of the coverage application and the costs of any subsequent appeal.4 This principle of full indemnity is based, not in the law of costs, but in the law of contracIn other words, an insured is «entitled to be made financially whole» for legal costs incurred in securing a defence under the policy.3 This broad principle has not only been used to indemnify insureds for their past defence costs, but also the future defence costs of counsel of their choice, the costs of the coverage application and the costs of any subsequent appeal.4 This principle of full indemnity is based, not in the law of costs, but in the law of contracin securing a defence under the policy.3 This broad principle has not only been used to indemnify insureds for their past defence costs, but also the future defence costs of counsel of their choice, the costs of the coverage application and the costs of any subsequent appeal.4 This principle of full indemnity is based, not in the law of costs, but in the law of contracin the law of costs, but in the law of contracin the law of contract.
[29] The legislature chose not to provide a specific cost consequence for an insurer's failure to participate in mediation, such as substantial indemnity costs against a losing defendant or deprivation of full costs of a winning defendant.
Limit on cross-examinations 7 (1) Subject to subsection (2), cross-examinations on any documentary evidence filed by the parties shall not exceed a total of seven hours for all plaintiffs in the proceeding and seven hours for all defendants (2) A judge may extend the time permitted for cross-examination on documentary evidence if it is necessary to do so in the interest of justice Costs on dismissal 8 (1) If a judge dismisses a proceeding under this section, the moving party is entitled to costs on the motion and in the proceeding on a full indemnity basis, unless the judge determines that such an award is not appropriate in the circumstaCosts on dismissal 8 (1) If a judge dismisses a proceeding under this section, the moving party is entitled to costs on the motion and in the proceeding on a full indemnity basis, unless the judge determines that such an award is not appropriate in the circumstacosts on the motion and in the proceeding on a full indemnity basis, unless the judge determines that such an award is not appropriate in the circumstances.
Special costs to successful applicants in most cases Defendants who succeed in having the claims against them stuck under this law should be entitled to costs on a full indemnity basis, subject to a judge's discretion in exceptional cases where such are not warranted.
If a defendant is successful in having a libel action dismissed on this basis, there is a presumption of costs being awarded on a full indemnity basis, the statute says.
In the recent Hoang v The Personal Insurance Co., 2017 ONSC 4193 (CanLII) case, the Court ordered the insurance company to pay full indemnity costs (all legal fees) where the insurance company had wrongfully denied coverage.
The corporation claimed full indemnity of its legal costs in the amount of $ 35,495 on the basis that the condominium declaration specifically provided that an owner would fully indemnify the corporation for any costs or damages resulting from an owner's act or omission.
But in his opinion the conduct of the Defendant in this case also warranted full - indemnity costs as well because,
Claimants argue that they should be compensated for those costs in full, or at least on a Solicitors Act 1974 or indemnity basis of assessment.
If the action is dismissed, the legislation provides for costs to be awarded on a full indemnity basis and allows the motion judge, if the court finds the action to have been brought in bad faith or for an improper purpose (i.e. a SLAPP), to order damages to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant.
The motion judge held that the repetition of these accusations, which had already been rejected in court, justified awarding costs against Mr. Best on a full indemnity scale.
User shall indemnify and hold Exide Life and / or the Affiliates, as the case may be, including their officers, employees and agents, indemnified against all losses and expenses on full indemnity basis which Exide Life may incur, sustain, suffer or is likely to suffer in connection with Exide Life or Affiliates» execution of the User's instructions and against all actions, claims, demands, proceedings, losses, damages, costs, charges and expenses as a consequence or by reason of providing a service through payment gateway for any action taken or omitted to be taken by Exide Life and / or the Affiliates, its officers, employees or agents, on the instructions of the User.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z