Sentences with phrase «full judicial council»

However, the final decision lies with the full judicial council.

A majority of the full judicial council agreed that Matlow's behaviour constituted misconduct, but overruled the removal recommendation.

Not exact matches

The Judicial Council's full report is available in PDF and there is a summary on the Council's website.

These decisions led to the formation of the Joint Legislative Council Special Committee on Judicial Discipline and Recusal («Special Committee») to study the two issues and recommend legislation to the full Legislature.

R (Bhandari) v Croydon LBC (Unreported, Admin Ct): B & C applied for judicial review of the decision of the Council's independent appeal panel that C was liable to refund it the full cost of residential care that had been provided to her between 2014 and 2015.

That a full hearing before the Ontario Judicial Council would go forward was overwhelming as a necessary adjunct of attempting to restore public confidence.

A. 20 In effect, this means that whilst decisions of the DSB create an obligation on the part of the losing party to comply with WTO rules, enforcement can be achieved by various means — including amicable settlement, compensation, or the suspension of trade concessions.101 Indeed, it was for this reason that the CJEU found in the case of Portugal v Council that a DSB decision did not oblige the losing party to achieve full implementation of its recommendations, where the possibility of temporary compensation or retaliatory measures remained available.102 In other words, the outcome was prescribed, but not the means.103 This contrasts with the position under EU law, where there is a right to an effective remedy from a judicial body.

It was accepted that the orders had implemented the first defendant lord chancellor's prior policy decision (the decision) that the principle of «full cost recovery» in setting court fees (the principle) should be applied to public law family proceedings; that the rationale for the decision had been a wish to fix fees at a level which reflected the true cost to the courts services and to replace the then extant model which involved heavy subsidisation; and that s 92 of the Courts Act 2003 (CA 2003) was relevant insofar as it empowered the lord chancellor to prescribe court fees by order, and that it set out obligations to «consult» specified judicial persons, the Civil Justice Council in civil proceedings, and «persons likely to have to pay [fees]», prior to the making of any orders.