Both
full sea ice models and seasonal melting projections applied to detailed sea ice distributions and trajectories provided the main semi-quantitative information for the Outlook.
Both
full sea ice models and seasonal melt projections applied to detailed sea ice distributions and trajectories provided the main semi-quantitative information for the Outlook.
Not exact matches
Climate
models are not yet able to include
full models of the Greenland and Antarctic
ice sheets and to dynamically simulate how
ice sheet changes influence
sea level.
The
full title is: «
Ice melt,
sea level rise and superstorms: evidence from paleoclimate data, climate
modeling, and modern observations that 2 o C global warming could be dangerous ``.
As Stroeve et al. (2012) discuss, newer climate
models have made some progress in this area, but still can not account for the
full extent of the Arctic
sea ice decline.
The
models are certainly wrong when it comes to simulating the rate of arctic
sea ice loss, or the
full dynamics of
ice sheet mass balance changes.
Second, the IPCC clearly states «
models [of
sea level rise] used to date do not include uncertainties in climate - carbon cycle feedbacks nor do they include the
full effect of changes in
ice sheet flow.»
The chemistry - climate
models used for the 2006 Ozone Assessment, predict that the Antarctic ozone hole will achieve
full recovery in the second half of this century, and that this may have profound impacts on the surface winds and, likely, on other aspects of the Earth's climate, including surface temperatures, locations of storm tracks, extent of dry zones, amount of
sea ice, and ocean circulation.
When a
full - depth ocean
model is used, something intriguing happens: the loss of Arctic
sea ice triggers a far - flung response that mimics climate change itself, including a slowdown of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), a build - up of heat in the tropical oceans over several decades, and a warming of the atmosphere a few miles above the tropics.