Sentences with phrase «fully human person»

-LSB-... I recall] the words addressed to you by my predecessor Pope John Paul II in November 2003: «scientific truth, which is itself a participation in divine Truth, can help philosophy and theology to understand ever more fully the human person and God's Revelation about man, a Revelation that is completed and perfected in Jesus Christ.

We are often accountable for them: no fully human person is likely to blame somebody or something else for all of them.

I am, instead, committed to a gospel that truly is «good news» and gives us all voices and believes and sees those who have survived as fully human persons.

Not exact matches

I fully believe with you that Bitcoin for the first time is an empowering human and technology development where for the first time we allow for people to electronically send money anywhere in the world.

«Time» is something humans created to quantifying the passing of events, because we need it to understand the world around us (or at least most of us do; there are people with strange mental conditions that are fully functioning but have no concept of time).

Reflecting on the mystery of teachers one never meets or on the practical uselessness of philosophy, Schall here reminds increasingly busy people that human beings are most fully human when they are engaging in such unserious and impractical activities.

I have argued that a fully developed «theology of the finite» must accept and affirm both the pleasure and the pain of human physicality, since we are not free - floating spirits or intellects but embodied persons.

Further, it is not true that being killed by a fully autonomous military drone necessarily violates the dignity of the human person.

When we talk about the actions of Jesus we need to be careful because He has two natures — He is fully divine and fully human — even though He is only one, divine Person — God the Son, the second Person of the Trinity.

And the proof of this is that today, in order to remain human or to become more fully human, all the peoples from end to end of the earth are being inexorably led to formulate the world's hopes and problems in the very terms devised by the West.

Play's transcendent dimension, its experience of the meeting of the holy and the human spirit, is fully understood as transcendence only in light of the Spirit's further definitive work on Lewis's behalf, his introduction of Lewis to the person of Christ.

Thomas asks how can one person be both fully God and fully human?

the loss of the fully personal to the imperialism of a single - visioned mindscape, we are led to entertain the possibilities that human life is larger than currently conceived, and that the experience and concept of play might provide the contemporary person with a way into these larger realities.

I believe that this is indeed true, but only if the counselor actually sees the other person as fully human and not in some way a lesser or «not OK» person because of the difference.

The problem may not be with rights per se, whose articulation is invaluable to our conception of modern republicanism (and may even help more fully articulate what is true about Christian morality), but with an interpretation that takes rights as the whole of moral discourse and therefore, understands the abstract Lockean individual to be a comprehensive account of the human person.

Secondly, and more importantly, they realize fully what we human beings only sense obscurely, namely, that the intrinsic dynamism of mind and will within the individual person is toward transcendence, participation in the more comprehensive «mind» and «will» of a community.

For example, at one time many religious leaders in the early days of our «Christian nation» and even (some of our) Founding Fathers believed that people of African decent were not fully human and used the Bible as proof.

The first question has to do with Marxist humanism or with Marxism as a humanism: how, at the very core of an estranged humanity, are we able to rely on the hope calling us to a fully human future, when this project itself is nothing but the visualization of alienated people?

In this sense a process hermeneutic will be more fully «secular» than the new hermeneutic, since it will recognize that all beings, in all times and places, who can in the full sense be named human persons, are — simply by virtue of their humanity — capable of grasping (and being grasped by) the message of the text.

The idea that there are spiritual forces at work in the world, or that human action does not fully control the public square, is of course rejected as an absurdity by many, if not most, people today.

These people fully believed they were in the right, because they thought God had directed them to commit these crimes against their fellow human beings, and they were largely unwilling to even begin questioning their long - held beliefs.

Paul did not need human knowledge or wisdom, he did not even rely on his knowledge but instead fully, in faith relied on the power of the cross to change people's hearts.

That Jesus was fully human does mean that the actual occasions constituting Jesus as a living person were not in any instance the actual entity God or, if God is conceived as a living person, the actual occasions constituting the divine life.

Debate over this issue remains prominent among process theologians to this day and will be discussed more fully in the second part of this paper, but it should be remarked here that Hartshorne has consistently attempted to envision God, in this and in some other respects, after the model of the human person.

Always central to his writing is a fully orthodox defence of the literal divinity of the Person of Jesus Christ and also of his true human nature as Son of Man.

He became so fully human that people had (and still have) trouble believing He was God.

And fighting a really important PR battle, which was getting people to see that the victims of HIV were just like them, and not some kind of unpleasant category of people who weren't fully human.

The moral obligation for the advancement of health thus rests upon the duty of becoming integral persons, with the human powers fully operating and cooperating in accord with their proper natures.

Orthodox Christianity has customarily moved from an account of Christ's person (fully divine, fully human) to his work (revealer of the Father and reconciler to the Father).

Then aren't they also less than fully persons — and if less than fully persons, then less than fully humans?

The stubborn, persistent problem of classical Christology, how one person could be both fully divine and fully human, practically disappears within a Whiteheadian framework.

He cited potential problems as the use of data without people's knowledge and bias decision making, such as computers making decisions in human resources and job applications without fully understanding the criteria.

This is the context for understanding some of document's most humble of expressions, such as: «Christian revelation contributes greatly [subsidium affert magnum] to the promotion of this communion between persons,... a world becoming more unified every day» (23) and, the Church «contributes toward making the family of man and its history fully human [humaniorem reddendam]» (40).

Under a certain view, one that happens to be dominant today, people can be considered fully human only to the extent that they enter into sexual relationships.

I feel that most people don't fully understand how fickle mother nature can be and how utterly dependent we are for our day - to - day supplies on a network of human cooperation that could easily break down in the face of catastrophe.

Secondly, according to Hartshorne,» [n] o human associates can be fully sensitive to all that passes in any one human person; and no human laws or institutions can be perfectly adjusted to any individual, to say nothing of all individuals» (RH 32).

Because, as hard as it can be to stomach, oppressors are people too: fully human and containing all the complexity and contradiction that we do.

For those who still cling to their now fully discredited religious reservations Obama assures them that he offers this dismissal of their views as a «person of faith»; likewise, for those who still insist there is any moral uncertainty, he comforts them with the simplistic platitude that the only relevant moral imperative is our «work to ease human suffering».

Jesus - fully human and fully god, why do you think God would humble himself and be with his creation (total love), when sin entered the world we were seperated from God forever, God pure, and humans tainted, the only way was for God to send Jesus to pay the price of sin, he took the sting out of death, and bridged the gap for humans and heaven, there is no greater sacrifice, God loves all of us, I was an unbeliever, but came to the truth - read the book of John and make up your own mind - so many people taint Gods word, but the Holy bible is the truth and it will set you free.

In the process of the maturing of the Christ from Adam to Jesus (and probably a few other fully enlightened humans since then), people envisioned and contemplated spiritual concepts and recorded their insights about God.

It was personal from the beginning, but that only becomes fully evident in the light of its manifestation in human persons.

It was further maintained that the right to development is the right of individuals, groups and peoples to participate in, contribute to, and enjoy continuous economic, social, cultural and political development, in which all human rights and fundamental freedoms can be fully realized.

The touchstone is paragraph 22 of Gaudium et Spes, which famously asserts that only in Jesus Christ is the mystery of the human person fully unveiled to the human race, and that each human being is invited in some way into the paschal mystery of Jesus Christ.

To realise its being and life, and to experience the fullness of human experiencing, the human person must be the subject and object of love, for it is precisely in love that the human person most fully actualizes itself, and thus reaches the fullest realization of its being and life (66).

St. Irenaeus, 2nd century Bishop of (what is now) Lyons, France, is believed to have said, «The Glory of God is the human person fully alive.»

Moreover, Wojtyła explains that freedom, and with it morality, is central to the human person: that «which is most characteristic of a person, that in which a person (at least in the natural order) is most fully and properly realised, is morality.»

And though free thought is certainly a precondition for doing the good, and is thus presupposed of morality, it is only in the very doing of the good in freedom that the human person most fully manifests itself.

Rational people, don't let it gall and upset you so much that the human mind did not spring fully enlightened from the first moment of sentience.

no, they place value on human life and a human in prison is not fully living and so thats a crime against that person and the faith.

Fully as thought - provoking, as we are to see, has been the fact that some of the chronic evils which have plagued the human race have reached their most colossal dimensions through peoples which have borne the Christian name and have been longest under the influence of Christianity.