It functions as an entity in a constant state of movement, with shifting techniques, try - outs, changeable rules and individual images that expand into series.
Before setting up your office, make sure you have all your paperwork complete in accordance to the local and regional laws that allow you to
function as an entity.
The health care component must meet the requirements of this rule that apply to a particular type of covered entity when it is
functioning as that entity; e.g., when a health care component is operating as a health care provider it must meet the requirements of this rule applicable to a health care provider.
Not exact matches
The Milwaukee County Sheriff's Office has relatively few
functions compared to other local law - enforcement
entities, such
as the city's police department.
Third and finally, the traditional story misses the real
function of private banks, which is to solve an information problem in the purest Hayekian senses. That is, banks are or should be specialists in risk assessment and risk taking. They should know their client, understand the local market and have their pulse on the broad economy. Arguably, if properly structured, they can and should do this better than other
entities such
as governments. In other words, the proper role of banks should be underwriting — lend money, hold the debt, and bear the risk. Which is a long - winded way of getting to the main point of this post.
While the AIIB still has many obstacles to overcome before it is a
functioning entity (not least the opposition of the United States and Japan,
as well
as the incumbent Asian Development Bank in Manila), there can be little doubt now that it will come to fruition.
As is the case with Bitcoin and most altcoins, Litecoin is a decentralized
entity, which means that it
functions without a central authority or governance agency.
only actual
entities can
function as efficient causes.
There Leclerc quotes Whitehead
as follows: «The
functioning of one actual
entity in the self - creation of another actual
entity is the «objectification» of the former for the latter actual
entity» (PR 34).
One group holds that, in view of the marked differences between God and all other actual
entities, there are reasons to see the divine satisfaction
as also
functioning differently from the satisfactions of actual occasions.
The causal presence of a past noncontiguous occasion is real» when it is rightly felt
as originating elements of feeling that are important to the becoming occasion and when intermediate occasions
function primarily to mediate these elements
as they are derived from that
entity.
This decision can not be a
function of the substantial activity
as such, of the eternal objects, or of the actual
entities.
Thus, every
entity contributes its own particularity to the determination of each novel actuality; thus, too, every
entity contributes itself
as repeated; and thus, finally, every
entity in its objective
functioning transcends itself — it is repeated beyond itself so
as to be immanent in, and given for the immediacy of, each novel actuality (PR 324, 327, 336, 366).
Therefore, «according to the fourth Category of Explanation it is the one general metaphysical character of all
entities of all sorts, that they
function as objects» (PR 336).
Since there are no eternal objects or pre-existing forms in Hartshorne's view, the
function of the abstract pole of God can not be solely one of the valuation of such
entities as it is for Whitehead.
Any
entity, thus intervening in processes transcending itself, is said to be
functioning as an «object».
This view, at any rate, is the only one compatible with saying,
as Whitehead does say, that an
entity which is actual, is actual regardless of whether its present existence is that of a subject enjoying the universe from which it arises or that of a superject
functioning objectively in subsequent processes.
An actual
entity is to be conceived both
as a subject presiding over its own immediacy of becoming, and a superject which is the atomic creature exercising its
function of objective immortality.
For, without doing violence to a single organic doctrine, we could avoid the embarrassment of saying that an occasion qua subject is not an
entity by the simple expedient of redefining «
entity» to signify whatever
functions, or is destined to
function,
as a potential for processes of becoming.
This is why, according to that principle, «it is the one general metaphysical character of all
entities of all sorts, that they
function as objects.
There would, accordingly, be various units of process in the universe with the larger units generally incorporating the smaller units within themselves, But each unit, from the smallest (a given actual
entity) to the largest (the divine community) would be structured the same way, i.e.,
as a self - sustaining unity in totality of
functioning parts or members.
The result tends to undermine the unity of God
as an actual
entity and, especially, the unity of God's
functioning.
In this light, the Holiness Code
functions to establish Israel itself
as a holy
entity,
as a community different in certain ways from other peoples.
As he writes in Category of Explanation xxii: «An actual
entity by
functioning in respect to itself plays diverse roles in self - formation without losing its self - identity.
In contrast to the foregoing, our contention will be that the «natures» of God can better be understood, not
as distinguishable parts, but
as ways of indicating various interdependent modes of
functioning by the whole actual
entity, God.
This first
function, then, would not require the
functions of the consequent nature except
as they are needed to complete the actuality of the
entity (God) to which the
function belongs.2
Hence, within the context of the metaphysical theory of the objective idealism,
as elaborated in «Realism and Idealism,» the term «a priori» receives a different meaning: a priori ideas
function as abstract
entities,
as potentialities that are gradually actualized in the evolving reality.
I have intentionally chosen
as examples those areas in which consciousness seems most autonomous to show that even there the conscious element is profoundly influenced by unconscious processes rather than being a self - contained
entity or
function.
On the one hand, the objectified sheer matter - of - factness of actual
entities is lifted, leaving a sufficient quality of concrete givenness to allow the latter to
function now
as «indicators.»
Visible and tangible
entities must finally be understood
as functions of these quite different
entities — not vice versa.
For the logical constructions are complex propositional
functions that represent the descriptive characteristics of inferred
entities such
as electrons, billiard
In the absence of such data, the phrases do not denote nonexistent or transcendent objects or
entities; rather, they simply do not denote at all, and the presumed metaphysical puzzle is,
as much
as anything, merely a
function of awkward grammar.19
This involves: (i) a given operation or
function, (ii) a set of
entities, (iii) explanation of the primitive ideas, and (iv) axioms
as rules governing the relations of the
entities.
Indeed Whitehead says that the
function of God
as the source of the initial aim of each actual
entity»... is analogous to the remorseless working of things in Greek and in Buddhist thought.
He says, «The world is self - creative; and the actual
entity as self - creating creature passes into its immortal
function of part - creator of the transcendent world.
In Religion in the Making God is a non-temporal actual
entity who
functions as this principle, i.e.,»... the indetermination of mere creativity is transmuted into a determinate freedom.»
These organizations generally do not
function as denominational
entities within the evangelical world and thus, strictly speaking, are not the visible church.
As described by the UN Secretariat in a document issued on June 3, 2009, the
functions of the new
entity can be subdivided into four clusters:
«An actual
entity is to be conceived both
as a subject presiding over its own immediacy of becoming, and a superject which is the atomic creature exercising its
function of objective immortality» (PR 45 / 71).
God
as an actual
entity does have such efficacy for other
entities, but creativity is not an actual
entity and hence, can not
function as an efficient (or final) cause of anything.
It is always the actual
entity that acts, not one of its poles
as such, although in many of its
functions one pole or another may be primarily relevant.
«8 Whereas Whitehead speaks of past occasions
as «
functioning» in the self - creation of new occasions, Leclerc tells us that in Whitehead's systematic position this «
functioning» can not imply agency.9 He adds: «This should be stressed because the contrary supposition might arise from Whitehead's statement... that upon objectification an actual
entity «acquires causation whereby it is a ground of obligation characterizing creativity».»
Similarly, creativity is incapable of
functioning as the formal cause of any actual
entity, since it is totally neutral
as to form.
Since Whitehead attributes this
function to God, it seems that, to a greater degree than Whitehead intended, God must be conceived
as being the reason that
entities occur at all
as well
as determining the limits within which they can achieve their own forms.
My point is that, at the time Leclerc wrote his interpretation of Whitehead, he understood Whitehead's systematic position to be that past actual
entities function in the present concrescence only
as passive perceived data, not
as truly causally efficacious.
We can now return to the
function of creativity The past actual
entities, God's gift of an initial subjective aim, and God's primordial nature
as the storehouse of all eternal objects provide the new
entity» with the resources for its own journey (concrescence) towards a final self - identity.
Whitehead says that «two conditions must be fulfilled in order that an
entity may
function as an object in a process of experiencing: (1) the
entity must be antecedent, and (2) the
entity must be experienced in virtue of its antecedence: it must be given» (Al 229).
God thus
functions as the organ of novel options for the new actual
entities.
Lacking creativity - characterization and, especially, creativity - esse, they can not
function as real agents, and, thus, they can not establish the new actual
entity with its own creativity
Second, since creativity requires form (eternal objects) before it can
function as the esse,
as the being - here of any actual
entity; the primordial nature also
functions as creativity's «first limitation.