Several decades ago, Morningstar introduced the now - ubiquitous nine - box matrix known as the style box, providing a framework to evaluate
funds against peers with similar investment styles.
Lipper rankings are comprised of five unique measures (Total Return, Consistent Return, Preservation, Expense, and Tax Efficiency), each with a 1 - to - 5 score, ranking
each fund against its peers.
Not exact matches
«And we are now at a decision point: sustained global commitments and recent
funding cuts affect capacity and capability for a full - spectrum fight
against a near -
peer adversary.»
Choose your own
peer group based on underlying factors like portfolio construction and industry focus, and benchmark your
fund against funds with similar strategies.
Labour proposed a motion to set up a committee on trade unions and party
funding, which attracted 327
peers in favour and 234
against.
«In many ways, I'm rebelling
against «the system,» which today awards short - term
funding for
peer - reviewed proposals that have near - guaranteed results.
ReACTION, created by the New Yorkers
Against Gun
Fund, is a youth program for middle and high school students that promotes education and leadership to train students to become
peer mentors.
Steve Zimmerman, the co-founder of the Coalition of Community Charter Schools, a blanket organization for local independent charters, agreed to speak publicly
against DeVos and said he believes his
peers in the charter world are staying quiet because of
funding concerns.
Categories are the foundation of a system that rates and ranks each
fund against its «
peers.»
Even though the
fund suffered a smaller decline in 2008 than its
peer world allocation
funds did -LRB--20.6 vs. -29 % per Morningstar), it significantly declined
against its reference portfolio of ETFs.
Echoing her suggestion,
fund managers also often ask to be judged «over full cycle» when comparing performance
against their
peers.
Although the
fund's 10 % annualized return since its inception through February 2014 roughly matches the category norm, its low volatility has allowed it to stack up well
against its
peers on a risk - adjusted basis.
As a reminder, the card measures how well each
fund in a family has performed
against its
peers since inception (or at least back to January 1960, which starts our Lipper database).
The fifth shows the
fund's Sharpe ratio, a measure of risk - adjusted returns,
against its
peers.
The
fund has low standard deviation amongst its
peer at 1.63
against category average of 1.99.
The
fund has low standard deviation amongst its
peers at 1.75
against category average of 1.99.
The
fund's beta is moderate at 0.28
against 0.31 category average thereby indicating that both the
peers and the
fund are not very volatile in relation to market movement.
All - Star
Funds typically have at least a three year track record and compare favorably
against their
peers based on historical return, risk, expenses, manager tenure, performance and style consistency, asset size and growth and must be 1) structured through sound investment philosophy and process, 2) implemented with acceptable level of investment risk management strategy and 3) supported by a well - balanced investment firm.
Passive Bond
Funds have done well
against their actively managed
peers.
Recommended
Funds: Each month SMI suggests mutual funds that are performing well against their p
Funds: Each month SMI suggests mutual
funds that are performing well against their p
funds that are performing well
against their
peers.
Data providers like Morningstar and Lipper can also provide some context by placing a
fund in a
peer group and comparing it
against an index.
The large mutual
fund databases can tell us how our
funds are performing
against peers to the percentile.
Plaintiffs argue the sheer volume of three hundred total investment choices for retirement investors indicates that defendants failed properly to monitor and evaluate the historical performance and expense of each of these
funds, compare that historical performance and expense to a
peer group of
funds and / or even compare the three segments
against one another.
Also, when choosing which
funds to buy, compare performance
against the
fund's
peers.
All - Star
Funds typically have at least a three year track record and compare favorably
against their
peers based on historical return, risk, expenses, manager tenure, performance and style consistency, asset size and growth and must be 1) structured through sound investment philosophy and process, 2) implemented with acceptable level of investment risk management strategy and 3) supported by a well - balanced investment firm.
When the returns of HDFC Balanced
Fund are compared
against its
peers during the past 5 year period, then at 18.83 percent returns it has done as good as other similar
funds like Birla Sun Life Balanced ’95
Fund (18.20 %), ICICI Prudential Balanced
Fund (19.38 %), SBI Magnum Balanced
Fund (19.00 %), and Tata Balanced
Fund — Regular Plan (17.90 %).
The
fund received a four - star rating
against a «world bond»
peer group.
Shortly, we hope to publish an ongoing tally, or «
Fund Family Score Card» if you will, because... during the next commercial break, while watching a fund family's newest media campaign, we want to make it easier for you to gauge how well a fund family has performed against its pe
Fund Family Score Card» if you will, because... during the next commercial break, while watching a
fund family's newest media campaign, we want to make it easier for you to gauge how well a fund family has performed against its pe
fund family's newest media campaign, we want to make it easier for you to gauge how well a
fund family has performed against its pe
fund family has performed
against its
peers.
As a result, it has a lot more downside volatility than the average long - short
fund (it was down 34 % in 2008, for example, compared with 15 % for its
peers) but also a more explosive upside (gaining 42 % in 2009
against 10 % for its
peers).
If Nic Lewis is a self - described independent self -
funded climate researcher, he really ought to be able to defend himself
against his
peers first.