UCS report finds that the oil company spent nearly $ 16 million to
fund skeptic groups and create confusion around the certainty of global warming.
Not exact matches
In the area of climate change, the leaked documents revealed that the
group funds vocal climate
skeptics, including Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change founder Craig Idso ($ 11,600 per month), physicist Fred Singer ($ 5,000 plus expenses per month), and New Zealand geologist Robert Carter ($ 1,667 per month).
We had firsthand experience dealing with climate
skeptics, amplified by advocacy
groups like the Competitive Enterprise Institute and a lot of the think tanks that were allegedly
funded by ExxonMobil and other firms.
The
fund is designed to help scientists like Professor Michael Mann cope with the legal fees that stack up in fighting attempts by climate -
skeptic groups to gain access to private emails and other correspondence through lawsuits and Freedom of Information Act requests at their public universities.
A recent story in the Los Angeles Times provided an update on the
funding behind two associated climate
skeptic groups that have been involved in attacks on clean energy in Ohio.
These two corporations are infamous for their
funding of climate change «
skeptic» think tanks and front
groups.
There is «empirical evidence» but it's identified by
skeptics despite efforts by government
funded agencies and environmental
groups to block, deny, and discredit with personal attacks.
Just when we thought the op - ed letter couldn't get worse, these fake
skeptics have the gall to suggest that we «follow the money,» because climate «alarmism» supposedly brings bountiful research
funding, «an excuse for governments to raise taxes», «big donations» for environmental
groups, and other similar tinfoil - hattery.
The investigative blogger Deep Climate has been working to set the record straight on how an orchestrated campaign by members of Congress, industry -
funded global warming denialist
groups and PR operatives, and professional «
skeptics» has spread misleading information about the paleoclimate... Continue reading →
«A
group of climate
skeptics who weighed in on climate lawsuits in California revealed their recent
funding, and court documents show their donors are a mix of fossil fuel companies and conservative think tanks.»
He has criticized both industry -
funded skeptics and environmental
groups on their biased treatment of the Global Warming issue.
A 2010 investigation by the Institute for Southern Studies found the John Locke Foundation to be one of the most outspoken climate
skeptics in North Carolina, working together with other
groups funded by the Koch Brothers and Art Pope.
DCI
Group is a lobbying and PR firm, which has historically worked with R.J. Reynolds Tobacco and was behind the now - defunct Tech Central Station (TCS), a website that worked as a forum for climate change
skeptics and received direct
funding from ExxonMobil for «climate change support.»
The U.S. government has enlisted an outspoken
skeptic of global warming in a legal fight with environmental
groups over U.S.
funding for overseas energy projects.
The use of this tiny
group of «
skeptics» became clear in the spring of 1995 when they were forced to disclose for the first time under oath how much
funding they had received from industry sources.
(Reuters)- Willie Soon, a U.S. climate change
skeptic who has also discounted the health risks of mercury emissions from coal, has received more than $ 1 million in
funding in recent years from large energy companies and an oil industry
group, according to Greenpeace.
Anthony Leiserowitz, director of the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, attributes this decline to five factors: The economic collapse, a severe decrease in media coverage, weather events like «Snowmaggedon,» the efforts of the «denial industry» (the network of industry -
funded think tanks and political advocacy
groups that push
skeptic views), and the «ClimateGate» debacle.
Pingback: Science
group denounces House probe into climate
skeptics»
funding - The Washington Post
They claimed that the problem has been that fossil fuel interests have massively outspent underdog environmental
groups,
funding skeptics to mislead the public and duping the media into giving too much credence to skeptical views about climate change.