Sentences with phrase «fund studying etc.»

Treat yourself with it, use it to fund studying etc..

Not exact matches

They even fund research scientists at prestigious universities to conduct studies and write policy papers that are skewed toward saying that their products don't contribute to diabetes, heart disease, obesity etc..

I found over the years, that the source of the funding (I always check and ask) for surveys, studies, polls etc. is often times just as important (or even more important) as the results.

Essentially, you can add funds to your pension plan to match non-existent employer contributions from times you spent studying etc..

In addition to funding all areas of veterinary companion animal health (surgery, internal medicine, ophthalmology, dentistry, infectious diseases, anesthesia, etc.), we currently have chosen to focus on these three areas of study.

(The $ 558 million refers to funding from foundations; the remaining funding for the Conspiracy came from individual donors, member dues, investment income, etc.) The Roanoke Times, Winston - Salem Journal, and other papers ran an article that even missed the distinction between revenues and spending as it declared, «A recent study by Drexel University professor Robert Brulle documents almost a billion dollars a year spent by think tanks, foundations and others denying that there's a problem at all.»

Because no one, not once, in any of the government funded studies that we've found, has EVER gone out and spoken directly to people living near industrial wind installations, or done health evaluations, looked at medical records, etc..

Given that the climate scientists have been studying the climate with massive funding for over 30 years since Hansen's 1981 predictions, and given that modelers are constantly trying to improve their models to include the new found knowledge about various climate forcings, feedbacks, oscillations, etc. that resulted, it seems that there should have been SOME improvement in the predictions over the years.

Prior buying a child plan, it is advisable to calculate the need for funds during the various stages such as primary and secondary education, higher studies, marriage, etc. and then invest accordingly.

For adoptions from public foster care, governments agencies — federal, state, provincial, territorial, and tribal — should fund adoption services so that prospective adopters bear no costs (including home studies, legal fees, pre - and post-placement support services, etc.).

Both the U.S. and Canadian federal governments should also fund in - depth comparative studies of successful adoptive families and families involved in disruptions / dissolutions to identify any parent or child / youth characteristics, practice issues (matching, preparation, etc.), and supportive services that are more common in successful adoptive placements versus disrupted / dissolved placements.

High risk of bias: there is evidence that researchers or data collectors would benefit if results favoured the intervention or control group (study authors also created therapeutic intervention, study authors received funding from a particular therapeutic intervention, etc..)

The cost for items like a feasibility study, architect fees, etc. would not be refunded if the deal fell through; therefore, the QI can not advance funds for those purposes.