Sentences with phrase «fund turnover ratios»

In determining which one to sell, I also looked at fund turnover ratios and distributions.

(Whichever is less: Assets Sold Off - or - New Investment Purchases) / (Net Assets - 12 quarter average) = Mutual Fund Turnover Ratio

Not exact matches

The fund has a turnover ratio of 24 %.

Consider expense ratios, sales loads, asset turnover, transaction costs and management style of individual fund investments, among other services.

For funds - If money managers are investing client cash in funds, the goal is to look for funds with low turnover ratios for your taxable accounts, Hagen said.

However, it also has a high turnover ratio of 86 %, which means the fund is regularly adding and subtracting stocks, which can lead to higher taxes for shareholders — though given the incredible performance of the fund, I doubt this has bothered most investors.

Although it is not listed in the fund prospectus, turnover ratio can have a substantial impact on a fund's performance and tax liability, and those who ignore this factor may be forfeiting more money than they realize over time.

However, a fund's turnover ratio is often overlooked by less experienced investors when they evaluate a given fund.

The fund's portfolio turnover ratio has been in the range of from 76 % to 100 + % over the years.

This $ 1.2 - billion small - cap value fund has a maximum 5.75 % sales charge, 1.30 % expense ratio and 40 % turnover.

This $ 642 million no - load fund, formerly known as Buffalo Science and Technology, sports a reasonable expense ratio of 1.01 % and portfolio turnover of 53 %.

When compared to funds of a similar style, a fund's turnover ratio gives a good indication of fund activism.

This is especially true for funds with high turnover ratios, in which portfolio composition changes rapidly.

The one that is included with their free subscription is handy for listing funds according to 18 criteria, such as category, manager tenure, minimum initial purchase, load or no - load, expense ratio, star rating, past performance, turnover, and basic portfolio composition.

The best noload stock index funds will have single digit annual percentage turnover ratios or at least very low double digit percentages.

This $ 575 million foreign equity fund has a maximum 5.5 % front sales charge, 3.12 % total and net expense ratios, and 136 % annual turnover.

Turnover Ratio: Of a mutual fund is a measurement that expresses the percentage of a particular fund's holdings that have been replaced (turned over) during the previous year.

Take Vanguard's Russell 2000 growth ETF, which had a turnover of 34 % last year and compare it to Vanguard's actively managed Explorer Fund which had a turnover ratio of 62 %.

According to Morningstar, the median long / short manager has an annual turnover ratio of 163 %, and the most active fund has an eye - watering turnover ratio of 7,042 %.

This $ 435 million no - load, mostly - foreign, multi-cap equity fund has a 1.25 % capped expense ratio and 42 % turnover.

The fund's lack of front sales charge, coupled with a low expense ratio and turnover as well as small historical distributions of only dividend income, partially offset its unimpressive performance.

The fund has a reasonable expense ratio and turnover.

This $ 876 million (at the end of February 2016) no - load fund has a 1.15 % expense ratio (after a fee waiver / reimbursement through August 2017) and 28 % turnover.

Not after you factor in expense ratios, tracking errors, fund structure, portfolio turnover, and transaction costs.

In other words, the manager slowly and perhaps partially divests and acquires some positions, while still retaining others, even in fund or portfolio with a high turnover ratio.

Turnover ratios for active funds in small and mid-cap are similar to those found in large blend.

Turnover is a ratio the SEC requires funds to disclose.

If the fund in question is going to be held in a taxable account, I make sure to look at two additional metrics: the «tax cost ratio» (on the «tax» tab) and portfolio turnover (on the «quote» tab), both of which can give an idea of the fund's tax efficiency.

This $ 1.6 billion no - load fund sports a relatively low 0.87 % expense ratio and has a 73 % turnover.

This $ 200 million fund has a 1.44 % expense ratio and 78 % turnover.

If you can find a value fund with a low expense ratio and low turnover ratio, your chances of beating the index are greatly increased.

This $ 43.5 - billion large - cap value fund has a 5.75 % maximum sales charge, 0.86 % expense ratio and 12 % turnover.

Despite a relatively low expense ratio and turnover of the fund, its performance further suffered from a hefty front load (not included in the above analyses).

This $ 2.2 billion emerging markets fund has a 5.75 % maximum sales charge, 1.53 % expense ratio and 36 % turnover.

This $ 21 billion no - load fund sports a 0.89 % net expense ratio and 51 % turnover.

This $ 2.2 billion no - load foreign large - cap growth fund has a 1.14 % expense ratio and 167 % turnover.

This $ 750 - million world large - cap fund has a 5.5 % maximum sales charge, 1.18 % expense ratio and 79 % turnover.

This $ 5.5 billion no - load fund sports a competitive 0.88 % expense ratio and low 14 % turnover.

This $ 3 billion, mid-cap fund has a 1.31 % expense ratio and 13 % turnover.

This $ 323 million no - load micro-cap growth fund has a 1.67 % net expense ratio (currently subject to a contractual limit) and 31 % turnover.

This $ 5.2 - billion no - load, large - cap growth fund has an attractive 0.76 % expense ratio but a relatively high 94 % turnover.

This $ 3.4 billion fund has a 5 % maximum sales charge, a reasonable 1.05 % expense ratio and 24 % turnover.

This mid-cap growth fund boasts $ 2.7 billion in AUM, an average expense ratio of 1.32 %, and a relatively low turnover of 15.6 % (three - year average).

This $ 1.1 billion mid-cap value fund has a 5.50 % maximum sales charge, 0.99 % expense ratio and 45 % turnover.

On the other hand, the expense ratio of the Schwab fund is lower, and its index generally should have lower turnover and therefore lower trading costs.

This $ 817 million fund has a maximum 4.25 % sales charge, 1.47 % net expense ratio and 29 % turnover.

This $ 3.5 billion fund has a maximum 5.25 % front load, 0.96 % expense ratio and 31 % turnover.

This $ 838 million small - cap growth fund has a 1.10 % net expense ratio (after a 0.40 % «expense limitation» currently in effect through January 2017) and a low 12 % turnover.

The fund had an asset turnover ratio of 1.45 in 2011, indicating that it made a significant number of trading decisions during the period.

This concentrated $ 581 million fund has a net front sales load of 5.26 % (assessed on a purchase of up to $ 50,000), minimum initial investment of $ 25,000, net expense ratio of 1.26 %, and relatively low turnover of 23 %.