Christians have to corrupt the clear meanings in the bible because they are more moral today than
the fundamental basis of the religion.
Not exact matches
Modernity's emphasis on secularism involves three elements - a) the desacralisation
of nature which produced a nature devoid
of spirits preparing the way for its scientific analysis and technological control and use; b) desacralisation
of society and state by liberating them from the control
of established authority and laws
of religion which often gave spiritual sanction to social inequality and stifled freedom
of reason and conscience
of persons; it was necessary to affirm freedom and equality as
fundamental rights
of all persons and to enable common action in politics and society by adherents
of all
religions and none in a religiously pluralistic society; and c) an abandonment
of an eternally fixed sacred order
of human society enabling ordering
of secular social affairs on the
basis of rational discussion.
In accordance with the principle that we should start from the experiential
basis of religion, we must consider first the
fundamental types
of religious experience which give rise to these two broad types
of models.
Based on how much they've written about it and go on and on about how «
fundamental» it is to their belief system, physicists have obviously made a
religion of it.
Freedom to «profess practice and propagate
religion makes sense as a
fundamental right
of persons only on the
basis of the recognition
of this difference.
Most Americans assume that the separation
of church and state is a
fundamental principle deeply rooted in American constitutionalism; that the First Amendment was intended to ensure that government does not involve itself with
religion (and vice versa); and that contemporary debates over such vexing issues as school prayer, voucher programs, government funding
of faith -
based organizations, and the rights
of religious minorities represent ongoing attempts to realize the separation intended by the Founders and like - minded early Americans.
The basic aim
of the party is to establish the
religion of Islam according to the Shafi'i school
of law as it applies to the ordinances for worship and the shari`a and to establish the interpretation
of the
fundamentals according to the teaching
of al - Ash «ari and al - Maturidi — whose teachings form the
basis for the theology
of the Sunnis.
«A
fundamental difference between religious and scientific thought is that the received beliefs in
religion are ultimately
based on revelations or pronouncements, usually by some long - dead prophet or priest... Dogma is interpreted by a caste
of priests and is accepted by the multitude on faith or under duress.»
[13][14] The school was built on a radical new model
of American higher education
based on founder Peter Cooper's
fundamental belief that an education «equal to the best technology schools [then] established» [15] should be accessible to those who qualify, independent
of their race,
religion, sex, wealth or social status, and should be «open and free to all».
Of course, freedom of expression was not unlimited and should be balanced with other fundamental rights at stake in this case — such as the right to dignity (Article 1 of the EU Charter on Fundamental Rights, «EU Charter») or the prohibition of discrimination on the basis of race or religion (Article 21 EU Charter
Of course, freedom
of expression was not unlimited and should be balanced with other fundamental rights at stake in this case — such as the right to dignity (Article 1 of the EU Charter on Fundamental Rights, «EU Charter») or the prohibition of discrimination on the basis of race or religion (Article 21 EU Charter
of expression was not unlimited and should be balanced with other
fundamental rights at stake in this case — such as the right to dignity (Article 1 of the EU Charter on Fundamental Rights, «EU Charter») or the prohibition of discrimination on the basis of race or religion (Article 21 E
fundamental rights at stake in this case — such as the right to dignity (Article 1
of the EU Charter on Fundamental Rights, «EU Charter») or the prohibition of discrimination on the basis of race or religion (Article 21 EU Charter
of the EU Charter on
Fundamental Rights, «EU Charter») or the prohibition of discrimination on the basis of race or religion (Article 21 E
Fundamental Rights, «EU Charter») or the prohibition
of discrimination on the basis of race or religion (Article 21 EU Charter
of discrimination on the
basis of race or religion (Article 21 EU Charter
of race or
religion (Article 21 EU Charter).
Fundamental to freedom
of religion is the freedom to change your mind about
religion and thus enforcement
of any «contract» that purports to bind you to some religiously
based course
of action could be seen as infringing on freedom
of religion.
This landmark case firmly grounded in English common law rights that were carried overseas by the colonists, including freedoms
of religion, speech, and assembly, as well as the
fundamental right
of jurors to render a general verdict
based on conscience, including setting aside the law when a just verdict requires it.
You know the
fundamentals of fair housing: You shouldn't ask any questions or
base any housing - related decisions on an applicant's race, color,
religion, sex, national origin, disability, or familial status, and you mustn't promote a property in terms such as «great building for single professionals.»