Yes, they do, according to an extensive analysis of the abstracts or summaries of scientific papers published over the past 20 years, even though public perception tends to be that climate scientists disagree over
the fundamental cause of climate change.
Thus, long - term variations of TSI (with account for their direct and secondary, based on feedback effects, influence) are the main
fundamental cause of climate changes since variations of the Earth climate is mainly determined by a long - term imbalance between the energy of solar radiation entering the upper layers of the Earth's atmosphere and the total energy emitted from the Earth back to space.»
Not exact matches
«Agents doing the dirty bidding
of the fossil fuel industry know they can't contest the
fundamental science
of human -
caused climate change,» he said in an email.
«Agents doing the dirty bidding
of the fossil fuel industry know they can't contest the
fundamental science
of human -
caused climate change.
Judge William Alsup had requested this tutorial to bring him up to speed on the
fundamental science before proceedings begin in earnest in a case brought by the cities
of San Francisco and Oakland, on behalf
of the people
of California, against a group
of major fossil fuel companies, addressing the costs
of climate change caused, they argue, by products those companies have sold.
The statement continues: «While the understanding
of the drivers and consequences
of climate change will continue to advance with additional research, the
fundamental premise remains sound that human life has altered the atmosphere and is one
of the
causes of climate change.»
«agents doing the dirty bidding
of the fossil fuel industry know they can't contest the
fundamental science
of human -
caused climate change.
Though not obvious, this claim is central to the tenet
of the paper, and is an example
of the
cause - versus - effect issue I repeatedly refer to in the past when discussing some
of the most
fundamental errors made in the scientific «consensus» on
climate change.
It calls for a new era
of climate change science where an emphasis is placed on «
fundamental, use - inspired» research, which not only improves understanding
of the
causes and consequences
of climate change but also is useful to decision makers at the local, regional, national, and international levels acting to limit and adapt to
climate change.
The Lowy Institute report argues that expected
climate change «poses
fundamental questions
of human security, survival and the stability
of nation states» and identifies food shortages, extreme weather events and rising sea - levels as potential
causes of large - scale, unregulated population movements in Asia and destabilisation
of governments unable to respond.
The widespread belief that AGW is the
fundamental cause of present - day
climate change is predicated on the apparent correlation between rising levels
of carbon dioxide and the increase in mean global temperature over the past two centuries.
However, I fear that until all these learned societies go back to the
fundamental principles
of science, like Nullius in Verba, Marcotte and people like him will think that, when it comes to
climate change, the right thing to do is forget science, and just present the propaganda that supports The
Cause and The Team.
He describes the person / people who released the latest batch
of CRU emails as: «agents doing the dirty bidding
of the fossil fuel industry know they can't contest the
fundamental science
of human -
caused climate change.
The warming global
climate is
causing fundamental changes to the carbon cycle in northern parts
of the world.
While we are ultimately interested in understanding and predicting how
climate will
change, regardless
of the
cause, an ability to differentiate anthropogenic
change from natural variability is
fundamental to help guide policy decisions, treaty negotiations, and adaptation versus mitigation strategies.
Such drying is a feature
of human -
caused climate change in that human - forced warming due to fossil fuel burning increases evaporation rates and related stress to forests even as it drives
fundamental alterations to precipitation patterns that can substantially worsen drought and wildfire intensity.
Both this
fundamental understanding
of the physics
of greenhouse gases and fingerprint studies show that natural
causes alone are inadequate to explain the recent observed
changes in
climate.
«Many
of the
fundamental questions concerning the nature and
causes of climate change are still largely unresolved because
of our incomplete quantitative understanding
of many
of the physical processes that enter into the global energy balance and for lack
of definitive observational data on which to test various theories.
To explain this, let's start with the
fundamentals: CO2 is the largest
cause of climate change.