Our most
fundamental conscious experience has generally been taken to be the perception of sensa, i.e., of relatively clear and distinct objects such as red, bitter, etc..
Not exact matches
Both diversity and re-entry are necessary to account for the
fundamental properties of
conscious experience.»
The source of the problem, as he sees it, is this set of assumptions: that those elements that are prior (clearest) in consciousness are genetically primitive, that sensory data are the most primitive data of
experience, that the elements of
experience most clearly expressed by language are the most primitive, and that
conscious introspection is the best way to identify the most
fundamental elements of
experience.
Since for both Whitehead and depth psychology unconscious
experience precedes and is more
fundamental than
conscious experience, a basic compatibility is available for fuller treatment.
Because of this, and because human
experience is so complex,
conscious introspection is not the best way to examine
experience for its most
fundamental elements.
Whereas Aristotle, as we have seen, took the first factor to be peculiar to
conscious experience and the second to be the more general factor lying at the base of consciousness, Whitehead took the subject - object structure as general and
fundamental and interpreted causal efficacy in terms of it.