More specifically, Agenda 21 states that «Indigenous people and their communities shall enjoy the full measure of human rights and
fundamental freedoms without hindrance or discrimination».
Not exact matches
«We believe that parents must retain the
fundamental freedom that they've always have to bring up their children in accordance with their own beliefs and values
without the state intervening and trying to push a certain view of alternative lifestyles to children.»
Nevertheless, both are devoted to the personal vocation of man, though under different titles... [Yet] at all times and in all places, the Church should have the true
freedom to teach the faith, to proclaim its teaching about society, to carry out its task among men
without hindrance, and to pass moral judgment even in matters relating to politics whenever the
fundamental rights of man or the salvation of souls requires it» (Gaudium et Spes, 76).
One theme that remains constant in this narrative is the
fundamental agreement that, as two distinct institutional expressions, church and state must seek to shape human desire in ways that promote public goods
without denying human
freedom.
... To deny this
fundamental freedom on so unsupportable a basis as the racial classifications embodied in these statutes, classifications so directly subversive of the principle of equality at the heart of the Fourteenth Amendment, is surely to deprive all the State's citizens of liberty
without due process of law.
Suswam, by his suit filed before the Federal High Court in Abuja, is asking the court to declare his detention in the custody of the DSS since February 25, 2017,
without trial, as a violation of his
fundamental rights, to personal liberty,
freedom of movement, and dignity of human person.
He sought, among other prayers in his suit, a declaration that his referral by the Senate and the Senate President's referral to the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions «for trial for expressing his opinion on the purport» of the bill «is an act calculated to interfere with or likely to constitute a breach» of his
fundamental human right to
freedom of expression
without interference.
«It represents yet another attempt on the part of the government to abridge
without sufficient justification
fundamental democratic rights and
freedoms that have underpinned our society for centuries and which we have defended against tyranny on many occasions.»
, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 313 [the Alberta Reference], McIntyre J. held that «while
freedom of association like most other
fundamental rights has no single purpose or value, at its core rests a rather simple proposition: the attainment of individual goals, through the exercise of individual rights, is generally impossible
without the aid and cooperation of others».
However, the judge recognized the
fundamental issue was balancing the rights of the parents with the right of the child and thus, even
without expressing it, gave due consideration to competing values underpinning important rights and
freedoms specified under the Charter.
Furthermore, as we know, free movement in the EU has been achieved through negative integration (the direct application of the Treaty provisions on the
fundamental freedoms to remove obstacles in national laws) or through positive measures (secondary EU legislation, harmonising national measures affecting the internal market),
without the need of conferring investment rights or special remedies for EU undertakings or citizens exercising their
freedom of movement.
Envision a world
without barriers - where
freedom and dignity are accepted as
fundamental human rights - a world where caring connects us all.