«Every person should have fair benefit and protection of the law when
a fundamental legal interest is threatened.
Not exact matches
«If ending impunity for grand corruption is to be considered a
fundamental national
interest worthy of being furthered, it is crucial to have a strong
legal rule to prevent and combat corruption rather pursue bills that would weaken the fight against corruption.
«Whether this sort of harassment should be countenanced is not about any particular political or special -
interest groups; instead, it is a
fundamental question about whether anyone can use (or, rather, misuse) public record laws to stifle science,» the
legal defense fund said in the amicus brief.
We process personal data on the following
legal bases: (1) with your consent; (2) as necessary to perform our agreement to provide Services; and (3) as necessary for our legitimate
interests in providing the Services where those
interests do not override your
fundamental rights and freedom related to data privacy
LRAP Minnesota helps reduce the education debt burden experienced by dedicated public
interest lawyers who represent low income clients seeking
legal services to secure essential needs like food, shelter and safety, and
fundamental rights like equal access to justice.
In another post published on this blog, Ziccardi Capaldo spoke against framing the
legal problem in the Taricco saga as a clash of the protection of Union's financial
interest and
fundamental rights.
Indeed, the rights and
interests of the victims of such fraud could be perfectly protected without infringing the general principle of
legal certainty and the
fundamental rights of the accused.
Other research
interests include EU law constitutional law, the EU
legal order,
fundamental rights in the EU and Eurocrisis law, especially as it applies to Ireland.
As noted above, in ENRC v. Dechert the Court of Appeal has confirmed that the concept of limited waiver is of general application, designed to ensure that the loss of
legal professional privilege (given its
fundamental importance) is limited to that which is necessary to protect other
interests.
Gloster LJ remarked that «the concept of limited waiver is of general application, designed to ensure that the loss of LPP [
legal professional privilege](given its
fundamental importance) is limited to that which is necessary to protect other
interests.»
The Chief Justice of Canada, the Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin, addressed the latter in her recent lecture to the Canadian Bar Association, but I do not perceive that she or anyone else in the
legal community have addressed the
fundamental issue that the SRL phenomenon raises: the right to participate in the making of common law; the ability to put a set of
interests before the courts that hitherto have not been able to afford to be there — and thus, a rather significant challenge to the validity of the whole body of common law as it stands.
It has delivered judgements on many
legal subjects: i.e. constitutional law,
fundamental rights, human rights, environmental law, private and public international law, to name a few, and of course, the famous concept of public
interest litigation (PIL).
The question presented was whether the trial court erroneously assigned to the mother the burden to prove that the child's placement with her was in the child's best
interests, because an established custodial environment existed with the grandparents, and whether the court's application of the Rummelt test constituted clear
legal error and violated mother's
fundamental liberty
interest in raising her children.
In addressing this
interest, both courts acknowledged that a state has an
interest in: (i) preserving life in general; (ii) preventing deaths that occur as a result of errors in medical or
legal judgment; (iii) preventing exercise of undue, arbitrary, and / or unfair influences over an individual's decision to end his / her life; (iv) safeguarding
interests of innocent third parties such as minor children and other family members; (v) assuring the integrity of the medical profession; and (vi) avoiding the adverse consequences that might ensue if physician - assisted suicide were declared a
fundamental right.
Topics:
legal research, Fourth Circuit, family law, Brett turner, Windsor update, Bostic v. Schaefer, same - sex marriage a
fundamental right, no compelling state
interest, Niemeyer dissent
KIND achieves
fundamental fairness through high - quality
legal representation and by advancing the child's best
interests, safety, and well - being.
However, it is also our goal to facilitate our client's
fundamental business
interest of getting the deal done by providing practical and, where necessary, innovative
legal advice.
«One of the
fundamental issues was whether [Gervais] should have gotten notice as an
interested party,» he tells
Legal Feeds.
This so - called loophole is, in fact, a
fundamental principle of our company law, enunciated long ago by the House of Lords in their decisions in Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22, [1895 - 9] All ER Rep 33 and Macaura v Northern Assurance Co Ltd [1925] AC 619, [1925] All ER Rep 51 — that a company has a
legal existence separate from its shareholders even when one individual controls all of its shares, and that the shareholders have no
interest in the company's assets.
EFF's public
interest legal work, activism, and software development preserve
fundamental rights.
substantive principles and norms, which — by their nature, position, and function — are of primary importance for the survival of the international system, while their application, possessing an overruling effect against all contrary
legal acts, is so
fundamental that it can not be simply entrusted to the goodwill of the
interested States.
... because the
fundamentals of native title are settled, it is not necessary for non-claimant parties to litigate all stages of a
legal matter where the law is not in dispute or their
interests are already protected under the Native Title Act.
104 «The native title rights and
interests which are the subject of the Act [NTA] are those which existed at sovereignty, survived that
fundamental change in
legal regime, and now, by resort to the processes of the new
legal order, can be enforced and protected.