Not exact matches
It therefore should be no surprise that many of them were (as put by the founder of the
Liberal Leagues) «hostile to the
fundamental principle of Christianity.»
Perhaps this is the source of that perennial frustration among the radicals, the refusal or the incapacity of the
liberals even to acknowledge the
fundamental points of contention between us: that
liberal principles are ontologically indifferent or that they are even the political expression of a sound Christian anthropology.
The problem is that a basic tenet of classical liberalism — a tenet generally accepted in the Western world by «
liberals,» as well as by many «conservatives» — is that differences regarding
fundamental principles of human nature and morality are not a threat to social and political life.
The
fundamental principle of the market economy within the
liberal tradition is its right to private property.
As Gunnar Myrdal explained, «America is conservative in
fundamental principles... but the
principles conserved are
liberal and some, indeed, are radical.»