But I don't think that qualifies as «pseudoscience,» which to me suggests such things as controversial hypotheses masquerading as self - evident assumptions («ordered complexity implies a designer»), or outright fallacies of inference and errors of fact, perhaps hidden behind familar jargon («in information - theoretic terms, evolution of the eye is impossible»), or cleverly disguised as well - established results from other sciences («quantum electrodynamics suggests that consciousness is
the fundamental nature of reality, and so we don't need to age, and crime will be reduced if we meditate on it correctly»).
The works in this exhibition illustrate enduring artistic concerns with the sublime, transcendence, and questions about
the fundamental nature of reality.
This process happens not just on a conscious level, but rather is
the fundamental nature of reality.
God can not possess that attribute unless
the fundamental nature of reality itself is such that it permits a consistent distinction between that which is a person, and that which is not.
Not exact matches
However, beyond this level
of conviction, life in a community also produces a primary perspective, a basic way
of understanding the
nature of things, a
fundamental vision
of reality.
For the past ten years, three theological issues have concerned me most: the public
nature of theology, the religious
reality of fundamental trust, and the meaning
of theological pluralism.
In spite
of failing to fulfil its primary intention, it provides certain
fundamental insights into the
nature of his understandings
of reality and into what may well be the conditions
of metaphysical thought.
By virtue
of his own research Sullivan arrived at the same
fundamental vision about the
nature of reality that Whitehead professed and molded it quite independently into a viable personality theory, suitable for use in psychotherapy.
A Christian theology and philosophy which does not wish to arouse the suspicion that this
fundamental truth
of Christianity is merely mythology, must put the question today why the infinite Logos, when he steps forth from himself into the sphere
of what is finite yet wills to manifest his own
nature precisely within that sphere, becomes material, and eternally maintains that material
reality even when his finite manifestation is brought to its perfection.
Looking at these passages it is clear that the authors were investigating
fundamental questions about the
nature of reality, and seeking for ultimate principles that would explain its existence and
nature.
Once the primordial
nature of God and its timeless ordering
of eternal objects is envisioned as the ground
of novelty, then not only can there he no
fundamental or ontological change
of reality, but potentiality as such must be limited to a primordial envisagement
of possibility.
On a more metaphysically
fundamental level, Whitehead's «philosophy
of organism also regards knowing as a special case
of the «bipolar»
nature of all becoming, whereby the direct «physical» response to objective
reality is partially transformed by «mental» functioning in the realization
of a novel subjective experience.
One way to contrast archaic and modern society, or rather the modern West and all traditional societies, archaic or historic, is to point out, as Louis Dumont following Alexis de Tocqueville has been doing in recent years, that traditional societies are characterized by hierarchy whereas modern societies are characterized by equality — at least in ideal.6 This contrast is rooted not just in political ideology but in
fundamental conceptions
of the
nature of reality.
We have criticized the conventional materialistic picture
of physical
reality, perception, causation and evolution that follows from a thorough - going expulsion
of mentality and feeling from the
fundamental constituents
of nature.
A new device searching for
fundamental units
of space and time has officially started taking data, and could reveal new features
of the
nature of reality
«We're asking
fundamental questions about the
nature of reality, so it's understandable,» Mersini - Houghton says.
Architecture
of Life, the inaugural exhibition in BAMPFA's landmark new building, explores the ways that architecture — as concept, metaphor, and practice — illuminates various aspects
of life experience: the
nature of the self and psyche, the
fundamental structures
of reality, and the power
of the imagination to reshape our world.
There's an image for that
fundamental reality of change: the dragon, which is the embodiment
of the dynamic energy that drives the cosmos, that generative
nature of reality as a tissue
of transformation.
«In a world saturated with spectacle and the kind
of augmented
reality made possible through the digital, Irwin's work, by contrast, raises critical questions about the
fundamental nature of how and what we perceive and the value
of «looking at... Continued
«In a world saturated with spectacle and the kind
of augmented
reality made possible through the digital, Irwin's work, by contrast, raises critical questions about the
fundamental nature of how and what we perceive and the value
of «looking at and seeing all
of those things that have been going on all along but previously have been too incidental or meaningless to really enter into our visual structure, our picture
of the world.
At its most
fundamental, painting is about the
nature of looking, and the power
of the reflection has always mystified us as the secondary version
of reality — in much the same way as painting itself.