First, similar to Barth's contention, Thielicke maintains, «
The fundamental order of creation and the created determination of the two sexes make it appear justifiable to speak of homosexuality as a «perversion»....
Not exact matches
Yet for all the affinity between the Thomist - Aristotelian theory
of natural law and the Lutheran theology
of the
orders of creation, we will need to observe the
fundamental differences between them that Barth's criticism blurs.
We may speak
of the
fundamental universal structures
of life as
orders of creation because God continues to create these possibilities
of existence in spite
of the fact that we live in a world
of sin and death.
The concept
of a divine «
order» (taksis or thesis) in
creation certainly plays a
fundamental role within Maximus» portrayal
of the cosmic drama.
Now it is central to the whole point
of David Novak's argument that this entire strategy is founded on a most
fundamental error, whose formulation we must cite in full, adding italics to highlight its centrality: «Theologically, the error here is that revelation is essentially reduced to the supreme awareness
of an
order already present in
creation.»