Scientists are increasingly finding that the two
fundamental points cited above may not be supported by the evidence.
Not exact matches
Now it is central to the whole
point of David Novak's argument that this entire strategy is founded on a most
fundamental error, whose formulation we must
cite in full, adding italics to highlight its centrality: «Theologically, the error here is that revelation is essentially reduced to the supreme awareness of an order already present in creation.»
The
cited case is only one particular
point on the scale and according to apsillers answer appears to be in «
fundamental disagreement» with the other case.
In dealing with the principles of
fundamental justice, the majority
pointed out that, contrary to the aura of inevitability apparent in many media reports, «enshrining [assisted suicide] as a constitutional right» is «a matter of serious concern to many Canadians... [and] no consensus on the subject is apparent, even among ethicists or medical practitioners» — and
cited how most national medical bodies including in Canada, the US, UK, New Zealand, Australia, and the and World Medical Associations, are opposed (Carter paras. 243, 249).